Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs Kepler.gl

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kepler.gl
Maps
Powerful open-source geospatial analysis tool for large-scale datasets, enabling beautiful data visualizations without coding
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; Kepler.gl kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and Kepler.gl actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | Kepler.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (freemium), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
Nothing recorded that Kepler.gl does not also cover.
Only in Kepler.gl
Nothing recorded that IndoorAtlas does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot Kepler.gl
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot Kepler.gl
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot Kepler.gl
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot Kepler.gl
Kepler.gl
No use cases recorded yet. See the Kepler.gl review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Kepler.gl
- Kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Kepler.gl
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Kepler.gl review.
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
Choose Kepler.gl if
Nothing in the data separates Kepler.gl from IndoorAtlas on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or Kepler.gl better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Kepler.gl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or Kepler.gl?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IndoorAtlas and On request for Kepler.gl.
- Does IndoorAtlas or Kepler.gl run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. Kepler.gl runs on Web.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kepler.gl starts at On request.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what Kepler.gl is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Fused
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE Technologies
- IndoorAtlas vs Apple Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs deck.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs QGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs Cesium ion
- IndoorAtlas vs GRASS GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs WhiteboxTools
- IndoorAtlas vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- IndoorAtlas vs Atlas.co
- IndoorAtlas vs Geographic Calculator
- IndoorAtlas vs Correlator3D
- IndoorAtlas vs Emlid Studio
- Kepler.gl vs Mappedin
- Kepler.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- Kepler.gl vs CesiumJS
- Kepler.gl vs SW Maps
- Kepler.gl vs Felt
- Kepler.gl vs Leica Infinity
- Kepler.gl vs Navmii GPS
- Kepler.gl vs Transit
- Kepler.gl vs Mapbox
- Kepler.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- Kepler.gl vs LocationIQ
- Kepler.gl vs Lonboard
- Kepler.gl vs Mapillary
- Kepler.gl vs MapQuest
- Kepler.gl vs MAPS.ME
- Kepler.gl vs Mapzen
- Kepler.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Kepler.gl vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Kepler.gl vs Fused
- Kepler.gl vs HERE Technologies
- Kepler.gl vs Apple Maps
- Kepler.gl vs deck.gl
- Kepler.gl vs QGIS
- Kepler.gl vs Cesium ion
- Kepler.gl vs GRASS GIS
- Kepler.gl vs WhiteboxTools
- Kepler.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Kepler.gl vs Atlas.co
- Kepler.gl vs Geographic Calculator
- Kepler.gl vs Correlator3D
- Kepler.gl vs Emlid Studio
