Travel · head to head
FareHarbor vs Protel

FareHarbor
Travel
Booking and reservation software for tour and activity operators with no subscription fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Protel
Travel
German hotel property management system, now owned and sold by Planet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FareHarbor the roughly 6% booking fee is added to the price your customer sees, so your headline price appears higher than a competitor absorbing their software cost, which is a direct disadvantage when guests price-compare.; Protel the vendor is now a payments company, so the economics of a deal run through card processing rates as much as software fees, and a hotel with good existing acquiring terms may lose more on processing than it saves on licence.
- They diverge on capability: FareHarbor covers Availability and capacity, Protel covers Front desk and reservations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FareHarbor and Protel actually diverge.
| Attribute | FareHarbor | Protel |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per booking fee added at checkout | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Travel).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FareHarbor
- Availability and capacity
- Customer checkout
- Digital waivers
- Manifests and dispatch
- OTA distribution
- Gift cards and point of sale
Only in Protel
- Front desk and reservations
- Conference and banqueting
- Cloud and on-premise editions
- Integrated payments
- Interface catalogue
- Multi-property operation
- Night audit and reporting
- Tax-free shopping links
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FareHarbor
- A kayak tour operator with strong seasonality that cannot justify a fixed monthly software fee through the winternot Protel
- An attraction wanting waivers, manifests and OTA distribution in one system without an upfront licencenot Protel
- A new operator launching with no capital who needs professional checkout from day onenot Protel
- A multi-activity business needing guide and equipment assignment across overlapping departuresnot Protel
Protel
- A German or Austrian hotel needing fiscal and tax compliance handled natively rather than bolted onnot FareHarbor
- A property with substantial conference and banqueting business that a rooms-only PMS cannot handlenot FareHarbor
- An existing Protel on-premise site deciding whether to move to the cloud edition or change vendornot FareHarbor
- A group wanting PMS and card acquiring from one supplier under a single contractnot FareHarbor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FareHarbor
- The roughly 6% booking fee is added to the price your customer sees, so your headline price appears higher than a competitor absorbing their software cost, which is a direct disadvantage when guests price-compare.
- With card processing on top, the effective cost is commonly 9 to 11% of booking value, so a high-volume operator pays far more over a year than a flat subscription would cost.
- There is no published rate card, so the fee you are quoted depends on the deal you negotiate and you cannot compare terms without going through onboarding.
- FareHarbor is owned by Booking Holdings, so your reservation system, your customer data and your availability sit inside the group that owns the largest OTA competing for your direct bookings.
- Because pricing is transactional, switching away is expensive in effort rather than money and operators tend to stay past the point where a subscription product would be cheaper.
Protel
- The vendor is now a payments company, so the economics of a deal run through card processing rates as much as software fees, and a hotel with good existing acquiring terms may lose more on processing than it saves on licence.
- The Protel name persists on the product but the corporate identity has moved to Planet, which makes contract, support and roadmap ownership harder to pin down than it looks from the product page.
- Hotels on the older on-premise edition face a migration to cloud that is a re-implementation rather than an upgrade, with the data and interface work that implies.
- Nothing about pricing is published, so a buyer cannot benchmark against Mews or Cloudbeds without a full sales process.
- Strength is concentrated in German-speaking Europe and the Middle East; support depth and partner ecosystem are noticeably thinner in North America and Asia Pacific.
Pricing, plan by plan
FareHarbor
On request- FareHarbor$undefined/month
- No monthly subscription and no setup fee
- Booking fee of around 6% added to the customer checkout price
- Card processing charged separately, giving an effective 9 to 11% of booking value
Protel
On request- protel PMS by Planet$undefined/year
- Quoted per property, no published rate card
- Cloud and on-premise editions priced differently
- Payment processing rates negotiated alongside the software
Which should you pick?
Choose FareHarbor if
- You need availability and capacity.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want customer checkout.
Choose Protel if
- You need front desk and reservations.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want conference and banqueting.
Questions people ask
- Is FareHarbor or Protel better?
- Neither clearly leads. FareHarbor starts at On request and Protel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FareHarbor or Protel?
- FareHarbor starts at On request and Protel at On request.
- Does FareHarbor or Protel run on more platforms?
- FareHarbor runs on Web, iOS, Android. Protel runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- What is FareHarbor best used for?
- FareHarbor is most often used for a kayak tour operator with strong seasonality that cannot justify a fixed monthly software fee through the winter, an attraction wanting waivers, manifests and ota distribution in one system without an upfront licence, a new operator launching with no capital who needs professional checkout from day one, a multi-activity business needing guide and equipment assignment across overlapping departures. Of those, a kayak tour operator with strong seasonality that cannot justify a fixed monthly software fee through the winter and an attraction wanting waivers, manifests and ota distribution in one system without an upfront licence are not what Protel is typically brought in for.
- What can FareHarbor do that Protel cannot?
- FareHarbor covers Availability and capacity, Customer checkout, Digital waivers, Manifests and dispatch. Protel covers Front desk and reservations, Conference and banqueting, Cloud and on-premise editions, Integrated payments.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FareHarbor: What does FareHarbor cost?
No subscription. Around 6% is added to the customer checkout price, plus card processing, giving roughly 9 to 11% of booking value in total.
Protel: Can you still buy Protel?
Yes. Planet acquired it in December 2021 and continues to sell it as protel PMS, though the corporate branding is Planet.
FareHarbor: Who pays the booking fee?
By default the customer, shown at checkout. Operators can choose to absorb it into their own price instead.
Protel: Why does the payments ownership matter?
Because the vendor earns on your card volume. Evaluate the processing rate alongside the software price rather than treating them as separate decisions.
FareHarbor: Who owns FareHarbor?
Booking Holdings, the parent of Booking.com, Priceline and Kayak.
Protel: Is the on-premise edition still supported?
It remains in the field with a large installed base, but new investment is directed at the cloud edition, so ask for an explicit support horizon in writing.
FareHarbor: At what volume does a subscription tool become cheaper?
Broadly once annual bookings exceed a few hundred thousand in value, at which point 6% dwarfs a fixed monthly plan.
Protel: Where is Protel strongest?
German-speaking Europe and the Middle East, where its interface catalogue and fiscal compliance are deepest.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FareHarbor vs Redeam
- FareHarbor vs Bokun
- FareHarbor vs TicketingHub
- FareHarbor vs Regiondo
- FareHarbor vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- FareHarbor vs Rezdy
- FareHarbor vs Egencia
- FareHarbor vs Sabre Red 360
- FareHarbor vs Corporate Traveller
- FareHarbor vs Travelport Smartpoint
- FareHarbor vs myCWT
- FareHarbor vs Bookinglayer
- FareHarbor vs Chekin
- FareHarbor vs Clock PMS+
- FareHarbor vs Duetto
- FareHarbor vs Hostfully
- FareHarbor vs Hotelogix
- FareHarbor vs IDeaS
- FareHarbor vs Cloudbeds
- FareHarbor vs Mews
- FareHarbor vs Opera PMS
- FareHarbor vs Shiji
- FareHarbor vs WebRezPro
- FareHarbor vs Careem
- FareHarbor vs Grab
- FareHarbor vs RoomRaccoon
- FareHarbor vs ThinkReservations
- FareHarbor vs Hostaway
- FareHarbor vs Wheelhouse
- FareHarbor vs BCD TripSource
- FareHarbor vs Boostly
- FareHarbor vs Center
- Protel vs Redeam
- Protel vs Bokun
- Protel vs TicketingHub
- Protel vs Regiondo
- Protel vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Protel vs Rezdy
- Protel vs Egencia
- Protel vs Sabre Red 360
- Protel vs Corporate Traveller
- Protel vs Travelport Smartpoint
- Protel vs myCWT
- Protel vs Bookinglayer
- Protel vs Chekin
- Protel vs Clock PMS+
- Protel vs Duetto
- Protel vs Hostfully
- Protel vs Hotelogix
- Protel vs IDeaS
- Protel vs Cloudbeds
- Protel vs Mews
- Protel vs Opera PMS
- Protel vs Shiji
- Protel vs WebRezPro
- Protel vs Careem
- Protel vs Grab
- Protel vs RoomRaccoon
- Protel vs ThinkReservations
- Protel vs Hostaway
- Protel vs Wheelhouse
- Protel vs BCD TripSource
- Protel vs Boostly
- Protel vs Center
