Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs GitLab CI/CD

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only GitLab CI/CD has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and GitLab CI/CD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | GitLab CI/CD |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that Entrust Identity as a Service does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot GitLab CI/CD
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot GitLab CI/CD
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot GitLab CI/CD
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or GitLab CI/CD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and GitLab CI/CD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or GitLab CI/CD?
- GitLab CI/CD has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for GitLab CI/CD.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or GitLab CI/CD run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. GitLab CI/CD runs on Web.
- Can I use GitLab CI/CD for free?
- Yes. GitLab CI/CD has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what GitLab CI/CD is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that GitLab CI/CD cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Depot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Turborepo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ESLint
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs pnpm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Buildkite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tilt
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Jitsu
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ConfigCat
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Octopus Deploy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Rust
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Vite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Daytona
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Earthly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs Cisco Duo
- GitLab CI/CD vs JumpCloud
- GitLab CI/CD vs Ping Identity
- GitLab CI/CD vs Frontegg
- GitLab CI/CD vs Authelia
- GitLab CI/CD vs Beyond Identity
- GitLab CI/CD vs Transmit Security
- GitLab CI/CD vs Akeyless
- GitLab CI/CD vs authentik
- GitLab CI/CD vs Logto
- GitLab CI/CD vs Speakeasy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Authy
- GitLab CI/CD vs ExpressVPN
- GitLab CI/CD vs Falco
- GitLab CI/CD vs Fenergo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Google Authenticator
- GitLab CI/CD vs Grype
- GitLab CI/CD vs Hanwha Vision
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE
