Cybersecurity · head to head
Beyond Identity vs GitLab CI/CD

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only GitLab CI/CD has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.; GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beyond Identity and GitLab CI/CD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beyond Identity | GitLab CI/CD |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that Beyond Identity does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot GitLab CI/CD
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot GitLab CI/CD
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot GitLab CI/CD
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot Beyond Identity
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot Beyond Identity
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot Beyond Identity
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot Beyond Identity
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot Beyond Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Pricing, plan by plan
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Which should you pick?
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Questions people ask
- Is Beyond Identity or GitLab CI/CD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beyond Identity starts at On request and GitLab CI/CD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beyond Identity or GitLab CI/CD?
- GitLab CI/CD has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Beyond Identity and Free for GitLab CI/CD.
- Does Beyond Identity or GitLab CI/CD run on more platforms?
- Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. GitLab CI/CD runs on Web.
- Can I use GitLab CI/CD for free?
- Yes. GitLab CI/CD has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Beyond Identity starts at On request.
- What is Beyond Identity best used for?
- Beyond Identity is most often used for an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered, a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches, a firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systems, a security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on top. Of those, an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered and a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches are not what GitLab CI/CD is typically brought in for.
- What can Beyond Identity do that GitLab CI/CD cannot?
- Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
SourceBeyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
SourceBeyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceRelated pages
More on Beyond Identity
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs Depot
- Beyond Identity vs Turborepo
- Beyond Identity vs Visual Studio Code
- Beyond Identity vs ESLint
- Beyond Identity vs pnpm
- Beyond Identity vs Buildkite
- Beyond Identity vs Tilt
- Beyond Identity vs Jitsu
- Beyond Identity vs ConfigCat
- Beyond Identity vs Octopus Deploy
- Beyond Identity vs Rust
- Beyond Identity vs Vite
- Beyond Identity vs Bazel
- Beyond Identity vs Daytona
- Beyond Identity vs Earthly
- Beyond Identity vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs 1Password
- GitLab CI/CD vs Cisco Duo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Transmit Security
- GitLab CI/CD vs Teleport
- GitLab CI/CD vs Authelia
- GitLab CI/CD vs authentik
- GitLab CI/CD vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- GitLab CI/CD vs Clerk
- GitLab CI/CD vs Frontegg
- GitLab CI/CD vs HashiCorp Boundary
- GitLab CI/CD vs Logto
- GitLab CI/CD vs Ory
- GitLab CI/CD vs WorkOS
- GitLab CI/CD vs Zscaler Internet Access
- GitLab CI/CD vs Milestone XProtect
- GitLab CI/CD vs Osano
- GitLab CI/CD vs Proton Mail
- GitLab CI/CD vs Veriff
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE
