Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs GitLab CI/CD

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and GitLab CI/CD actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | GitLab CI/CD |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | freemium |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that authentik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot GitLab CI/CD
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot GitLab CI/CD
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot authentik
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot authentik
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot authentik
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot authentik
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or GitLab CI/CD better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or GitLab CI/CD?
- authentik starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free.
- Does authentik or GitLab CI/CD run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. GitLab CI/CD runs on Web.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what GitLab CI/CD is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that GitLab CI/CD cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceRelated pages
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Depot
- authentik vs Turborepo
- authentik vs Visual Studio Code
- authentik vs ESLint
- authentik vs pnpm
- authentik vs Buildkite
- authentik vs Tilt
- authentik vs Jitsu
- authentik vs ConfigCat
- authentik vs Octopus Deploy
- authentik vs Rust
- authentik vs Vite
- authentik vs Bazel
- authentik vs Daytona
- authentik vs Earthly
- authentik vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs Authelia
- GitLab CI/CD vs Logto
- GitLab CI/CD vs Ory
- GitLab CI/CD vs Passbolt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Clerk
- GitLab CI/CD vs 1Password
- GitLab CI/CD vs Frontegg
- GitLab CI/CD vs OWASP ZAP
- GitLab CI/CD vs Infisical
- GitLab CI/CD vs Chainguard
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bitwarden
- GitLab CI/CD vs Cosign
- GitLab CI/CD vs CyberGhost VPN
- GitLab CI/CD vs Dahua Technology
- GitLab CI/CD vs Descope
- GitLab CI/CD vs Drata
- GitLab CI/CD vs DTiQ
- GitLab CI/CD vs Ory Kratos
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE
