Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs GitLab CI/CD
Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and GitLab CI/CD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authy | GitLab CI/CD |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that Authy does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot GitLab CI/CD
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot GitLab CI/CD
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot GitLab CI/CD
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot Authy
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot Authy
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot Authy
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot Authy
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or GitLab CI/CD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or GitLab CI/CD?
- Authy starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free.
- Does Authy or GitLab CI/CD run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what GitLab CI/CD is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that GitLab CI/CD cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
SourceAuthy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
SourceAuthy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceAuthy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Depot
- Authy vs Turborepo
- Authy vs Visual Studio Code
- Authy vs ESLint
- Authy vs pnpm
- Authy vs Buildkite
- Authy vs Tilt
- Authy vs Jitsu
- Authy vs ConfigCat
- Authy vs Octopus Deploy
- Authy vs Rust
- Authy vs Vite
- Authy vs Bazel
- Authy vs Daytona
- Authy vs Earthly
- Authy vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs LastPass
- GitLab CI/CD vs 1Password
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bitdefender Total Security
- GitLab CI/CD vs Norton 360
- GitLab CI/CD vs Google Authenticator
- GitLab CI/CD vs Cisco Duo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- GitLab CI/CD vs RoboForm
- GitLab CI/CD vs ExpressVPN
- GitLab CI/CD vs Authelia
- GitLab CI/CD vs Stytch
- GitLab CI/CD vs WorkOS
- GitLab CI/CD vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- GitLab CI/CD vs Sticky Password
- GitLab CI/CD vs Surfshark
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tanium
- GitLab CI/CD vs Teleport
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE