Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Jitsu

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Jitsu has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Jitsu jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Jitsu covers Event collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Jitsu actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Jitsu |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Per month by event volume |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Jitsu
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Jitsu
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Jitsu
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Jitsu
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting.
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower.
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem.
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/month
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Jitsu better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Jitsu at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Jitsu?
- Jitsu has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for Jitsu.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Jitsu run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Jitsu for free?
- Yes. Jitsu has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Jitsu is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Jitsu cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Jitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Jitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Jitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Atlantis
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tilt
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Penpot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Eclipse IDE
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pants Build
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ansible
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Helix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Notepad++
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Steampipe
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Backstage
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Blacksmith
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Coder
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Garden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GitLab CI/CD
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs HCP Terraform
- Jitsu vs Cisco Duo
- Jitsu vs JumpCloud
- Jitsu vs Ping Identity
- Jitsu vs Frontegg
- Jitsu vs Authelia
- Jitsu vs Beyond Identity
- Jitsu vs Transmit Security
- Jitsu vs Akeyless
- Jitsu vs authentik
- Jitsu vs Logto
- Jitsu vs Speakeasy
- Jitsu vs Authy
- Jitsu vs ExpressVPN
- Jitsu vs Falco
- Jitsu vs Fenergo
- Jitsu vs Google Authenticator
- Jitsu vs Grype
- Jitsu vs Hanwha Vision
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Ansible
- Jitsu vs Helix
- Jitsu vs Notepad++
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Backstage
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Garden
- Jitsu vs GitLab CI/CD
- Jitsu vs HCP Terraform
