Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tilt

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

Tilt
Developer Tools
Local Kubernetes development loop that rebuilds and live-updates containers on save
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Tilt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Tilt docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Tilt covers Live update.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Tilt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Tilt |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Tilt
- Live update
- Tiltfile as code
- Unified web UI
- Selective rebuilds
- Local and remote clusters
- Resource dependencies
- Extensions registry
- Custom buttons and triggers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Tilt
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Tilt
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Tilt
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Tilt
Tilt
- A team of ten or more engineers whose application is fifteen microservices on Kubernetes and who currently wait on CI to test a changenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An organisation onboarding new developers who want a single command that stands up the whole stack from a committed Tiltfilenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A platform team giving product engineers a consistent local environment against a shared remote development clusternot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A codebase where one repository contains several services and rebuilding all of them on every edit is the main source of lost timenot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Tilt
- Docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- The Tiltfile is Starlark, a Python dialect, so non-trivial setups become real programs that need reviewing and maintaining, and the person who wrote yours becomes a single point of failure.
- Live update only works when the running container can accept synced files and restart the process; compiled languages, distroless images and read-only filesystems often force you back to a full image rebuild, which removes the main benefit.
- It assumes Kubernetes. If your development target is plain Docker Compose or serverless functions, Tilt adds a cluster you did not need and a layer of abstraction with no payoff.
- There is no commercial support contract, no SLA and no paid tier, so when a Kubernetes version upgrade breaks something you are dependent on GitHub issues and a Slack channel rather than a vendor you can escalate to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Tilt
Free- TiltFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All features, no paid tier
- Community support via the Kubernetes Slack #tilt channel
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Tilt if
- You need live update.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want tiltfile as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Tilt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Tilt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Tilt?
- Tilt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for Tilt.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Tilt run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Tilt runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Tilt for free?
- Yes. Tilt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Tilt is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Tilt cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Tilt covers Live update, Tiltfile as code, Unified web UI, Selective rebuilds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Tilt: Is Tilt free?
Yes, entirely. It is Apache 2.0 open source with no paid tier and no licence fee.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Tilt: Who owns Tilt now?
Docker, which acquired it in May 2022. It remains open source and the repository is still actively maintained.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Tilt: Do I need a remote cluster?
No. It works against a local cluster such as kind, minikube or Docker Desktop, and also against a shared remote development cluster if your services are too heavy to run locally.
Tilt: How is it different from Skaffold?
Both automate the build-deploy loop. Tilt puts more weight on the live-update path and a multi-service dashboard; Skaffold is more configuration-driven and closer to Google's tooling.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Okteto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Dagger
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Backstage
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pants Build
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Atlantis
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Garden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Jitsu
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Penpot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Eclipse IDE
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hookdeck
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JFrog Artifactory
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Namespace
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nixpacks
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Octopus Deploy
- Tilt vs Cisco Duo
- Tilt vs JumpCloud
- Tilt vs Ping Identity
- Tilt vs Frontegg
- Tilt vs Authelia
- Tilt vs Beyond Identity
- Tilt vs Transmit Security
- Tilt vs Akeyless
- Tilt vs authentik
- Tilt vs Logto
- Tilt vs Speakeasy
- Tilt vs Authy
- Tilt vs ExpressVPN
- Tilt vs Falco
- Tilt vs Fenergo
- Tilt vs Google Authenticator
- Tilt vs Grype
- Tilt vs Hanwha Vision
- Tilt vs Okteto
- Tilt vs Dagger
- Tilt vs Bazel
- Tilt vs Backstage
- Tilt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tilt vs Pants Build
- Tilt vs Atlantis
- Tilt vs Garden
- Tilt vs Jitsu
- Tilt vs Visual Studio Code
- Tilt vs Penpot
- Tilt vs Eclipse IDE
- Tilt vs Hookdeck
- Tilt vs JFrog Artifactory
- Tilt vs Namespace
- Tilt vs Nix
- Tilt vs Nixpacks
- Tilt vs Octopus Deploy
