Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs GitLab CI/CD

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and GitLab CI/CD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authelia | GitLab CI/CD |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that Authelia does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot GitLab CI/CD
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot GitLab CI/CD
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot Authelia
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot Authelia
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot Authelia
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot Authelia
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or GitLab CI/CD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or GitLab CI/CD?
- Authelia starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free.
- Does Authelia or GitLab CI/CD run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. GitLab CI/CD runs on Web.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what GitLab CI/CD is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that GitLab CI/CD cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceRelated pages
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Depot
- Authelia vs Turborepo
- Authelia vs Visual Studio Code
- Authelia vs ESLint
- Authelia vs pnpm
- Authelia vs Buildkite
- Authelia vs Tilt
- Authelia vs Jitsu
- Authelia vs ConfigCat
- Authelia vs Octopus Deploy
- Authelia vs Rust
- Authelia vs Vite
- Authelia vs Bazel
- Authelia vs Daytona
- Authelia vs Earthly
- Authelia vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs authentik
- GitLab CI/CD vs Logto
- GitLab CI/CD vs Ory Kratos
- GitLab CI/CD vs Frontegg
- GitLab CI/CD vs Infisical
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bitwarden
- GitLab CI/CD vs Semgrep
- GitLab CI/CD vs Trivy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Chainguard
- GitLab CI/CD vs Passbolt
- GitLab CI/CD vs 1Password
- GitLab CI/CD vs Signicat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Silent Eight
- GitLab CI/CD vs Socket
- GitLab CI/CD vs Socure
- GitLab CI/CD vs SonicWall
- GitLab CI/CD vs Sophos Intercept X
- GitLab CI/CD vs Ory
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE
