Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Visual Studio Code has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Visual Studio Code requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Visual Studio Code actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Visual Studio Code |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces) |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Visual Studio Code
- IntelliSense
- Debugging
- Built-in Git
- Extensions
- Integrated terminal
- Syntax highlighting
- Code refactoring
- Snippets
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Visual Studio Code
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Visual Studio Code
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Visual Studio Code
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
- Code editingnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Web developmentnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Debuggingnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Version controlnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Remote developmentnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Visual Studio Code
- Requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- Performance can degrade with very large codebases (100,000+ files)
- Git integration is basic; requires extensions for advanced version control workflows
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Visual Studio Code
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Visual Studio Code review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Visual Studio Code if
- You need intellisense.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- You also want debugging.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Visual Studio Code better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Visual Studio Code at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Visual Studio Code?
- Visual Studio Code has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for Visual Studio Code.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Visual Studio Code run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Visual Studio Code runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- Can I use Visual Studio Code for free?
- Yes. Visual Studio Code has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Visual Studio Code is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Visual Studio Code cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense, Debugging, Built-in Git, Extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Visual Studio Code: Is Visual Studio Code free?
Yes. Visual Studio Code is completely free to use under the MIT license. There are no subscription fees or paid tiers.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Visual Studio Code: Can I use VS Code for remote development?
Yes. The Remote Development extension pack allows development on remote machines via SSH, in containers, or in Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) while using the full VS Code feature set.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Visual Studio Code: How many extensions are available?
The VS Code Marketplace contains thousands of extensions from Microsoft and the community for language support, debuggers, themes, formatters, and productivity tools.
SourceVisual Studio Code: Does VS Code support debugging?
Yes. VS Code includes built-in debugging for JavaScript, TypeScript, and Node.js, and supports debugging for Python, C++, C#, Java, Ruby, Go, PHP, and other languages via extensions.
SourceVisual Studio Code: What operating systems does VS Code support?
VS Code runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with identical features and keybindings across all platforms.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
More on Visual Studio Code
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ansible
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GoLand
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fig
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Turborepo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Harness
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Buildkite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Argo CD
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GitLab CI/CD
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs HCP Terraform
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Helm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GNU Emacs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Keil MDK
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Vite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Daytona
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Depot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs PhpStorm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RubyMine
- Visual Studio Code vs Cisco Duo
- Visual Studio Code vs JumpCloud
- Visual Studio Code vs Ping Identity
- Visual Studio Code vs Frontegg
- Visual Studio Code vs Authelia
- Visual Studio Code vs Beyond Identity
- Visual Studio Code vs Transmit Security
- Visual Studio Code vs Akeyless
- Visual Studio Code vs authentik
- Visual Studio Code vs Logto
- Visual Studio Code vs Speakeasy
- Visual Studio Code vs Authy
- Visual Studio Code vs ExpressVPN
- Visual Studio Code vs Falco
- Visual Studio Code vs Fenergo
- Visual Studio Code vs Google Authenticator
- Visual Studio Code vs Grype
- Visual Studio Code vs Hanwha Vision
- Visual Studio Code vs Ansible
- Visual Studio Code vs GoLand
- Visual Studio Code vs Fig
- Visual Studio Code vs Turborepo
- Visual Studio Code vs Harness
- Visual Studio Code vs Buildkite
- Visual Studio Code vs Argo CD
- Visual Studio Code vs GitLab CI/CD
- Visual Studio Code vs HCP Terraform
- Visual Studio Code vs Helm
- Visual Studio Code vs GNU Emacs
- Visual Studio Code vs Keil MDK
- Visual Studio Code vs Vite
- Visual Studio Code vs Bazel
- Visual Studio Code vs Daytona
- Visual Studio Code vs Depot
- Visual Studio Code vs PhpStorm
- Visual Studio Code vs RubyMine

