Sales Enablement · head to head
Avoma vs Endgame
Avoma
Sales Enablement
Meeting assistant, scheduler and conversation intelligence sold as separate priced layers
- From
- $19/month
- Rated
- -
Endgame
Sales Enablement
A context graph over CRM, calls and documents that answers account questions with citations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Avoma conversation Intelligence, the capability most buyers actually want, is a 29 US dollar per seat add-on rather than part of the plan, so the real cost of a working sales configuration is at least 53 per user per month against a 19 headline.; Endgame there is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
- They diverge on capability: Avoma covers AI meeting assistant, Endgame covers Context graph.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Avoma and Endgame actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Avoma
- AI meeting assistant
- Custom note templates
- Scheduling
- CRM sync
- Conversation intelligence
- Revenue intelligence
- Ask Avoma
- Lead router
Only in Endgame
- Context graph
- Cited answers
- Account research briefs
- Meeting and call prep
- Deal inspection
- Stakeholder mapping
- Executive and QBR briefings
- MCP server
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Avoma
- A ten-person sales team that wants CRM-ready call notes and booking links without buying a note-taker and a scheduler separatelynot Endgame
- A customer success group that needs every renewal conversation summarised against a fixed template so handovers stop losing contextnot Endgame
- A founder-led sales motion where the founder wants to review call recordings for coaching but cannot justify an enterprise conversation intelligence contractnot Endgame
- A team with many internal attendees who only need a few people recording, since viewers and collaborators do not consume paid seatsnot Endgame
Endgame
- An enterprise sales team on Salesforce and Gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day.not Avoma
- A revenue organisation that has standardised on Claude or ChatGPT internally and wants those assistants grounded in real CRM and call data instead of hallucinating account history.not Avoma
- A sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across Salesforce, Snowflake, Gong and Notion.not Avoma
- A new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.not Avoma
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Avoma
- Conversation Intelligence, the capability most buyers actually want, is a 29 US dollar per seat add-on rather than part of the plan, so the real cost of a working sales configuration is at least 53 per user per month against a 19 headline.
- Seat ceilings are baked into tiers, with Startup capped at 25 seats and Organization at 100, so growth forces a plan change for headcount reasons alone rather than feature reasons.
- Conversation intelligence on the Organization tier is explicitly limited, meaning teams discover which parts are missing after they have committed to an annual contract.
- Deal and forecast analytics are considerably shallower than dedicated revenue intelligence platforms, so an organisation that grows into serious pipeline inspection will replace the add-on rather than expand it.
- Summary quality depends on the note template being maintained, and teams that never configure templates get generic recaps that nobody reads, which quietly turns the subscription into an expensive transcript archive.
Endgame
- There is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
- The product has pivoted twice, from product-led sales signals to account intelligence to a GTM context graph, on a Series B raised in February 2022 with no publicly reported round since, which is real roadmap and data model risk on a multi-year contract.
- Value depends heavily on Salesforce and Gong depth, so organisations on HubSpot or a different call recorder get a substantially thinner graph and a weaker product for the same negotiation.
- Positioning as a context layer under other AI tools makes return on investment hard to attribute, because no user logs in and no workflow visibly belongs to it, which makes renewal conversations difficult to defend internally.
- Vendor-published performance claims around accuracy, speed and cost reduction have no third-party benchmark behind them, and the independent review profile has been effectively inactive for over a year, so there is no current corpus to validate against.
- As a layer rather than an application it is structurally exposed to Salesforce or Gong shipping equivalent native context, which would remove the reason to keep paying for it without any action on the vendor’s part.
Pricing, plan by plan
Avoma
$19/month- Startup$19/month
- Up to 25 paid seats
- Unlimited AI meeting assistant
- Automatic recording and transcription
- Organization$24/month
- Up to 100 paid seats
- Everything in Startup
- Custom AI topics and templates
- Enterprise$39/month
- Minimum 10 paid seats
- Everything in Organization
- Org-wide Ask Avoma
- Conversation Intelligence add-on$29/month
- Per seat, on top of a base plan
- Talk ratios and topic tracking
- Keyword alerts and coaching
Endgame
On request- Endgame$undefined/year
- Context graph across CRM, calls, documents and email
- Slack, Teams, web and CLI access
- MCP server for external assistants
Which should you pick?
Choose Avoma if
- You need ai meeting assistant.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension.
- You also want custom note templates.
Questions people ask
- Is Avoma or Endgame better?
- Neither clearly leads. Avoma starts at $19/month and Endgame at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Avoma or Endgame?
- Avoma starts at $19/month and Endgame at On request.
- Does Avoma or Endgame run on more platforms?
- Avoma runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension. Endgame runs on Web.
- What is Avoma best used for?
- Avoma is most often used for a ten-person sales team that wants crm-ready call notes and booking links without buying a note-taker and a scheduler separately, a customer success group that needs every renewal conversation summarised against a fixed template so handovers stop losing context, a founder-led sales motion where the founder wants to review call recordings for coaching but cannot justify an enterprise conversation intelligence contract, a team with many internal attendees who only need a few people recording, since viewers and collaborators do not consume paid seats. Of those, a ten-person sales team that wants crm-ready call notes and booking links without buying a note-taker and a scheduler separately and a customer success group that needs every renewal conversation summarised against a fixed template so handovers stop losing context are not what Endgame is typically brought in for.
- What can Avoma do that Endgame cannot?
- Avoma covers AI meeting assistant, Custom note templates, Scheduling, CRM sync. Endgame covers Context graph, Cited answers, Account research briefs, Meeting and call prep.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Avoma: Is 19 US dollars the real price?
Only for the base meeting assistant on annual billing. Adding Conversation Intelligence takes it to 53 per user per month, and Revenue Intelligence takes it to 82.
Endgame: Is this the Endgame that Elastic acquired?
No. That was an endpoint security company. This is Endgame, Inc. at endgame.io, an account intelligence and context platform for revenue teams.
Avoma: Do I pay for people who only watch recordings?
No. Viewers and collaborators are free. Paid seats are only required for users whose own meetings are recorded.
Endgame: Is it still the product-led sales signals tool?
No. It pivoted twice. If your shortlist came from 2021 to 2023 coverage of PQL scoring, the product you would buy today is different.
Avoma: Does it replace my scheduling tool?
For most teams, yes. Group and round-robin booking arrive on the Organization tier; Startup includes 1:1 links only.
Endgame: What does it cost?
Unpublished. There is no pricing page. Expect an enterprise annual contract negotiated per deal.
Avoma: Is it a Gong replacement?
Not at the enterprise end. Avoma covers the common conversation intelligence use cases at a fraction of the price but does not match Gong on deal analytics or coaching depth.
Endgame: Do I need Salesforce and Gong?
Not strictly, but the graph is built around them. On HubSpot or with another call recorder you get materially less value for the same price.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Avoma vs Attention
- Avoma vs Claap
- Avoma vs Default
- Avoma vs Mediafly
- Avoma vs 6sense
- Avoma vs People.ai
- Avoma vs RevenueHero
- Avoma vs Warmly
- Avoma vs Common Room
- Avoma vs Potion
- Avoma vs Twain
- Avoma vs Nooks
- Avoma vs Orum
- Avoma vs Regie.ai
- Avoma vs Arrows
- Avoma vs Dock
- Avoma vs Klue
- Avoma vs Cognism
- Avoma vs ConnectAndSell
- Endgame vs Attention
- Endgame vs Claap
- Endgame vs Default
- Endgame vs Mediafly
- Endgame vs 6sense
- Endgame vs People.ai
- Endgame vs RevenueHero
- Endgame vs Warmly
- Endgame vs Common Room
- Endgame vs Potion
- Endgame vs Twain
- Endgame vs Nooks
- Endgame vs Orum
- Endgame vs Regie.ai
- Endgame vs Arrows
- Endgame vs Dock
- Endgame vs Klue
- Endgame vs Cognism
- Endgame vs ConnectAndSell