Developer Tools · head to head
Daytona vs Resolver

Daytona
Developer Tools
Infrastructure for spinning up secure, sub-second sandboxes to run AI-generated code
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Daytona has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Daytona pricing is purely usage-based with no flat monthly plan, which can make costs harder to predict for steady workloads.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Daytona covers Sub-second sandbox creation, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Daytona and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Daytona
- Sub-second sandbox creation
- Per-second billing
- GPU instances
- Windows OS support
- Enterprise BYOC
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Daytona
- Running AI agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandboxnot Resolver
- Executing untrusted user code for a coding platformnot Resolver
- Running GPU workloads on demand without provisioning dedicated serversnot Resolver
- Testing Windows-specific code paths in a sandboxnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Daytona
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Daytona
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Daytona
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Daytona
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Daytona
- Pricing is purely usage-based with no flat monthly plan, which can make costs harder to predict for steady workloads.
- GPU instances are priced separately and can be significantly more expensive than standard compute for AI-heavy use cases.
- Enterprise features like SSO, audit logs, and BYOC are only available by contacting sales rather than self-serve.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Daytona
Free- Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
- $0.0504 per vCPU/hour
- $0.0162 per GiB memory/hour
- $0.000108 per GiB storage/hour after 5 free GiB
- Startup Program$undefined/mo
- Up to $50,000 in free credits for qualifying startups
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom usage limits
- SSO
- Audit logs
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Daytona if
- You need sub-second sandbox creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, windows, api.
- You also want per-second billing.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Daytona or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Daytona starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Daytona or Resolver?
- Daytona has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Daytona and On request for Resolver.
- Does Daytona or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Daytona runs on web, linux, windows, api. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Daytona for free?
- Yes. Daytona has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Daytona best used for?
- Daytona is most often used for running ai agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandbox, executing untrusted user code for a coding platform, running gpu workloads on demand without provisioning dedicated servers, testing windows-specific code paths in a sandbox. Of those, running ai agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandbox and executing untrusted user code for a coding platform are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Daytona do that Resolver cannot?
- Daytona covers Sub-second sandbox creation, Per-second billing, GPU instances, Windows OS support. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Daytona: How is Daytona usage metered?
Usage is billed per second across vCPU, memory, and storage consumed, with separate per-hour rates for GPU and Windows instances.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Daytona: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
There is no flat free plan, but new signups receive $200 in free compute credit with no credit card required to start.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Daytona: Are discounts available for startups?
Yes, the Startup Program offers up to $50,000 in free credits for qualifying companies.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Daytona vs CodeSandbox
- Daytona vs Coder
- Daytona vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Daytona vs Namespace
- Daytona vs WarpBuild
- Daytona vs Sweep
- Daytona vs Turborepo
- Daytona vs Keycloak
- Daytona vs Vite
- Daytona vs Depot
- Daytona vs Harness
- Daytona vs Swagger UI
- Daytona vs Prettier
- Daytona vs StackBlitz
- Daytona vs Steampipe
- Daytona vs Tilt
- Daytona vs Webpack
- Daytona vs LogicManager
- Daytona vs Diligent
- Daytona vs MetricStream
- Daytona vs NICE Actimize
- Daytona vs Omada Identity
- Daytona vs Sardine
- Daytona vs Silent Eight
- Daytona vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Daytona vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Daytona vs OneTrust
- Daytona vs Rhombus Systems
- Daytona vs Trulioo
- Daytona vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Daytona vs ExpressVPN
- Daytona vs Falco
- Daytona vs Fenergo
- Daytona vs Google Authenticator
- Daytona vs Grype
- Resolver vs CodeSandbox
- Resolver vs Coder
- Resolver vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Resolver vs Namespace
- Resolver vs WarpBuild
- Resolver vs Sweep
- Resolver vs Turborepo
- Resolver vs Keycloak
- Resolver vs Vite
- Resolver vs Depot
- Resolver vs Harness
- Resolver vs Swagger UI
- Resolver vs Prettier
- Resolver vs StackBlitz
- Resolver vs Steampipe
- Resolver vs Tilt
- Resolver vs Webpack
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
