Developer Tools · head to head
Harness vs Resolver

Harness
Developer Tools
Software delivery platform across CI, CD, security testing and cost management
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Harness has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Harness essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Harness and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Harness
Nothing recorded that Resolver does not also cover.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Harness
- Deploying apps to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud with rollbacksnot Resolver
- Integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before productionnot Resolver
- Automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expensesnot Resolver
- Enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecksnot Resolver
- Assessing deployment frequency and lead time productivity metricsnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Harness
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Harness
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Harness
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Harness
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Harness
- Essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates
- DevOps Essentials has no on-premises deployment option
- Internal Developer Portal requires minimum 20 developer licenses
- Pipeline execution history retention 6 months (Essentials) vs 25 months as add-on (Enterprise)
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Harness
Free- FreeFree
- Starter platform for software delivery lifecycle
- Open source options available (Harness Open Source, Litmus Chaos)
- Essentials$null/month
- Growing organizations with small to mid-size teams
- Packaged DevOps Essentials bundle
- Continuous software delivery capabilities
- Enterprise$null/month
- Large-scale organizations
- Pick any modules based on needs
- Advanced features
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Harness or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Harness starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Harness or Resolver?
- Harness has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Harness and On request for Resolver.
- Does Harness or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Harness runs on Web. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Harness for free?
- Yes. Harness has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Harness best used for?
- Harness is most often used for deploying apps to aws, azure, and google cloud with rollbacks, integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before production, automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expenses, enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecks. Of those, deploying apps to aws, azure, and google cloud with rollbacks and integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before production are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Harness do that Resolver cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Harness: Is there a free Harness plan?
Yes, Harness offers a free plan for individual developers and small teams with open source options including Harness Open Source and Litmus Chaos.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Harness: What are Harness's paid pricing tiers?
Harness offers Essentials for growing teams and Enterprise for large-scale organizations. Both require contacting sales for custom pricing. Pricing is based on modules and features selected.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Harness: Can Harness be deployed on-premises?
Enterprise plans include self-managed platform deployment option. DevOps Essentials bundle does not offer on-premises deployment.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Harness vs Spacelift
- Harness vs Visual Studio Code
- Harness vs ESLint
- Harness vs pnpm
- Harness vs Turborepo
- Harness vs Atlantis
- Harness vs Backstage
- Harness vs Octopus Deploy
- Harness vs HCP Terraform
- Harness vs Argo CD
- Harness vs Blacksmith
- Harness vs Garden
- Harness vs Namespace
- Harness vs Nix
- Harness vs Nixpacks
- Harness vs Okteto
- Harness vs OpsLevel
- Harness vs LogicManager
- Harness vs Diligent
- Harness vs MetricStream
- Harness vs NICE Actimize
- Harness vs Omada Identity
- Harness vs Sardine
- Harness vs Silent Eight
- Harness vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Harness vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Harness vs OneTrust
- Harness vs Rhombus Systems
- Harness vs Trulioo
- Harness vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Harness vs ExpressVPN
- Harness vs Falco
- Harness vs Fenergo
- Harness vs Google Authenticator
- Harness vs Grype
- Resolver vs Spacelift
- Resolver vs Visual Studio Code
- Resolver vs ESLint
- Resolver vs pnpm
- Resolver vs Turborepo
- Resolver vs Atlantis
- Resolver vs Backstage
- Resolver vs Octopus Deploy
- Resolver vs HCP Terraform
- Resolver vs Argo CD
- Resolver vs Blacksmith
- Resolver vs Garden
- Resolver vs Namespace
- Resolver vs Nix
- Resolver vs Nixpacks
- Resolver vs Okteto
- Resolver vs OpsLevel
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
