Developer Tools · head to head
Daytona vs Diligent

Daytona
Developer Tools
Infrastructure for spinning up secure, sub-second sandboxes to run AI-generated code
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Daytona has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Daytona pricing is purely usage-based with no flat monthly plan, which can make costs harder to predict for steady workloads.; Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- They diverge on capability: Daytona covers Sub-second sandbox creation, Diligent covers Diligent Boards.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Daytona and Diligent actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Daytona
- Sub-second sandbox creation
- Per-second billing
- GPU instances
- Windows OS support
- Enterprise BYOC
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Daytona
- Running AI agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandboxnot Diligent
- Executing untrusted user code for a coding platformnot Diligent
- Running GPU workloads on demand without provisioning dedicated serversnot Diligent
- Testing Windows-specific code paths in a sandboxnot Diligent
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Daytona
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Daytona
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Daytona
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Daytona
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Daytona
- Pricing is purely usage-based with no flat monthly plan, which can make costs harder to predict for steady workloads.
- GPU instances are priced separately and can be significantly more expensive than standard compute for AI-heavy use cases.
- Enterprise features like SSO, audit logs, and BYOC are only available by contacting sales rather than self-serve.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Pricing, plan by plan
Daytona
Free- Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
- $0.0504 per vCPU/hour
- $0.0162 per GiB memory/hour
- $0.000108 per GiB storage/hour after 5 free GiB
- Startup Program$undefined/mo
- Up to $50,000 in free credits for qualifying startups
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom usage limits
- SSO
- Audit logs
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Which should you pick?
Choose Daytona if
- You need sub-second sandbox creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, windows, api.
- You also want per-second billing.
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Questions people ask
- Is Daytona or Diligent better?
- Neither clearly leads. Daytona starts at Free and Diligent at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Daytona or Diligent?
- Daytona has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Daytona and On request for Diligent.
- Does Daytona or Diligent run on more platforms?
- Daytona runs on web, linux, windows, api. Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- Can I use Daytona for free?
- Yes. Daytona has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Daytona best used for?
- Daytona is most often used for running ai agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandbox, executing untrusted user code for a coding platform, running gpu workloads on demand without provisioning dedicated servers, testing windows-specific code paths in a sandbox. Of those, running ai agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandbox and executing untrusted user code for a coding platform are not what Diligent is typically brought in for.
- What can Daytona do that Diligent cannot?
- Daytona covers Sub-second sandbox creation, Per-second billing, GPU instances, Windows OS support. Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Daytona: How is Daytona usage metered?
Usage is billed per second across vCPU, memory, and storage consumed, with separate per-hour rates for GPU and Windows instances.
SourceDiligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Daytona: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
There is no flat free plan, but new signups receive $200 in free compute credit with no credit card required to start.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Daytona: Are discounts available for startups?
Yes, the Startup Program offers up to $50,000 in free credits for qualifying companies.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Diligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Daytona vs CodeSandbox
- Daytona vs Coder
- Daytona vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Daytona vs Namespace
- Daytona vs WarpBuild
- Daytona vs Sweep
- Daytona vs Turborepo
- Daytona vs Keycloak
- Daytona vs Vite
- Daytona vs Depot
- Daytona vs Harness
- Daytona vs Swagger UI
- Daytona vs Prettier
- Daytona vs StackBlitz
- Daytona vs Steampipe
- Daytona vs Tilt
- Daytona vs Webpack
- Daytona vs LogicManager
- Daytona vs Resolver
- Daytona vs MetricStream
- Daytona vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Daytona vs Transcend
- Daytona vs OneTrust
- Daytona vs Milestone XProtect
- Daytona vs Camio
- Daytona vs Delinea
- Daytona vs Dahua Technology
- Daytona vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Daytona vs IBM QRadar
- Daytona vs Trivy
- Daytona vs Trulioo
- Daytona vs Unit21
- Daytona vs Veracode
- Daytona vs Very Good Security
- Daytona vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs CodeSandbox
- Diligent vs Coder
- Diligent vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Diligent vs Namespace
- Diligent vs WarpBuild
- Diligent vs Sweep
- Diligent vs Turborepo
- Diligent vs Keycloak
- Diligent vs Vite
- Diligent vs Depot
- Diligent vs Harness
- Diligent vs Swagger UI
- Diligent vs Prettier
- Diligent vs StackBlitz
- Diligent vs Steampipe
- Diligent vs Tilt
- Diligent vs Webpack
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
