Developer Tools · head to head
CodeSandbox vs Resolver
CodeSandbox
Developer Tools
Cloud platform for instant, isolated development sandboxes and code execution
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only CodeSandbox has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CodeSandbox detailed paid plan pricing was not published on the accessible pages, making cost comparison difficult.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: CodeSandbox covers Instant sandboxes, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CodeSandbox and Resolver actually diverge.
| Attribute | CodeSandbox | Resolver |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CodeSandbox
- Instant sandboxes
- Programmatic sandbox API
- Secure isolated execution
- Browser-based editor
- CI/CD sandbox support
- Scalable VM infrastructure
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CodeSandbox
- Running AI agent-generated code safely in isolationnot Resolver
- Prototyping and sharing web projects in-browsernot Resolver
- Executing untrusted code for a code playground productnot Resolver
- Using sandboxes as ephemeral CI/CD build environmentsnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot CodeSandbox
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot CodeSandbox
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot CodeSandbox
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot CodeSandbox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CodeSandbox
- Detailed paid plan pricing was not published on the accessible pages, making cost comparison difficult.
- Focus has shifted toward programmatic sandbox infrastructure, which may be less approachable for casual users just wanting a quick online editor.
- Public sandboxes are visible to others by default, which is not ideal for proprietary code.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
CodeSandbox
Free- FreeFree
- Public sandboxes
- Basic sandbox usage
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose CodeSandbox if
- You need instant sandboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want programmatic sandbox api.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is CodeSandbox or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. CodeSandbox starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CodeSandbox or Resolver?
- CodeSandbox has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CodeSandbox and On request for Resolver.
- Does CodeSandbox or Resolver run on more platforms?
- CodeSandbox runs on web, api. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use CodeSandbox for free?
- Yes. CodeSandbox has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is CodeSandbox best used for?
- CodeSandbox is most often used for running ai agent-generated code safely in isolation, prototyping and sharing web projects in-browser, executing untrusted code for a code playground product, using sandboxes as ephemeral ci/cd build environments. Of those, running ai agent-generated code safely in isolation and prototyping and sharing web projects in-browser are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can CodeSandbox do that Resolver cannot?
- CodeSandbox covers Instant sandboxes, Programmatic sandbox API, Secure isolated execution, Browser-based editor. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CodeSandbox: Does CodeSandbox offer a free tier?
Yes, CodeSandbox offers a free option available on the platform. Users can start for free.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
CodeSandbox: Where can I find CodeSandbox's pricing details?
CodeSandbox maintains a dedicated pricing page, but specific tier names, feature breakdowns, and costs are not displayed on the landing page.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
More on CodeSandbox
Other head to heads
- CodeSandbox vs StackBlitz
- CodeSandbox vs Daytona
- CodeSandbox vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- CodeSandbox vs Namespace
- CodeSandbox vs Coder
- CodeSandbox vs Deep Code
- CodeSandbox vs Refact
- CodeSandbox vs GitHub Copilot
- CodeSandbox vs Earthly
- CodeSandbox vs Moonrepo
- CodeSandbox vs Swagger UI
- CodeSandbox vs PartyKit
- CodeSandbox vs Soketi
- CodeSandbox vs SonarQube
- CodeSandbox vs Sourcegraph
- CodeSandbox vs Sweep
- CodeSandbox vs Visual Studio
- CodeSandbox vs Warp
- CodeSandbox vs LogicManager
- CodeSandbox vs Diligent
- CodeSandbox vs MetricStream
- CodeSandbox vs NICE Actimize
- CodeSandbox vs Omada Identity
- CodeSandbox vs Sardine
- CodeSandbox vs Silent Eight
- CodeSandbox vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- CodeSandbox vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- CodeSandbox vs OneTrust
- CodeSandbox vs Rhombus Systems
- CodeSandbox vs Trulioo
- CodeSandbox vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- CodeSandbox vs ExpressVPN
- CodeSandbox vs Falco
- CodeSandbox vs Fenergo
- CodeSandbox vs Google Authenticator
- CodeSandbox vs Grype
- Resolver vs StackBlitz
- Resolver vs Daytona
- Resolver vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Resolver vs Namespace
- Resolver vs Coder
- Resolver vs Deep Code
- Resolver vs Refact
- Resolver vs GitHub Copilot
- Resolver vs Earthly
- Resolver vs Moonrepo
- Resolver vs Swagger UI
- Resolver vs PartyKit
- Resolver vs Soketi
- Resolver vs SonarQube
- Resolver vs Sourcegraph
- Resolver vs Sweep
- Resolver vs Visual Studio
- Resolver vs Warp
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
