Marketing · head to head
Convert vs Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Testing
A/B testing and feature experimentation with a hybrid client and server-side engine
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convert has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convert pricing is driven by monthly tested users, starting at $399 per month for 100,000 monthly tested users on Growth and $599 on Pro; Kameleoon no rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
- They diverge on capability: Convert covers A/B testing, Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convert and Kameleoon actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convert
- A/B testing
- Multivariate testing
- Analytics
- API access
- Google Analytics
- SSL encryption
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
Only in Kameleoon
- Visual A/B test editor
- Server-side experimentation
- Feature flags
- Anti-flicker engine
- AI personalisation
- EU data hosting
- Shared audiences
- Statistics options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convert
- A/B and multivariate testing for conversion optimizationnot Kameleoon
- Full-stack experimentation on web and mobilenot Kameleoon
- Sequential testing and statistical confidence trackingnot Kameleoon
Kameleoon
- A European retailer whose legal team requires EU-hosted experimentation data and has ruled out US-only vendorsnot Convert
- A team running both marketing page tests and product feature rollouts that wants one results engine rather than two disagreeing onesnot Convert
- A media site where client-side flicker on a test variant is visibly damaging the reading experiencenot Convert
- An organisation re-tendering experimentation after Optimizely or VWO pricing changes and wanting an independent European vendornot Convert
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convert
- Pricing is driven by monthly tested users, starting at $399 per month for 100,000 monthly tested users on Growth and $599 on Pro
- Single Sign-On requires the Pro plan at $599 per month
- Multivariate testing, multi-page testing, full stack and feature flags, sequential testing and raw test data export are all withheld from the Growth plan
- Phone support, change history and guided onboarding require Pro
- The advertised $299 and $420 per month rates require paying the full year up front at $3,588 or $5,040
- The Enterprise plan is price on request, is only available as an annual plan, and its data segregation feature carries additional costs
- Listed prices exclude VAT, GST and other taxes, which are added at checkout
- Above 5 million monthly tested users there is no published rate
Kameleoon
- No rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
- Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation are licensed as separate capabilities, so the unified platform story costs materially more than the entry configuration most buyers are first quoted.
- The partner and agency ecosystem is concentrated in France and continental Europe; a buyer in North America or Asia will find fewer implementation specialists and less community knowledge than for Optimizely or VWO.
- The integration catalogue is smaller than the market leaders, so a stack built on less common analytics or CDP tooling may need custom work that a larger vendor would cover natively.
- Client-side visual testing still carries the structural problems of the approach, including performance cost and single-page-application fragility; the anti-flicker engine reduces the symptom but does not remove the dependency on the DOM staying stable.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convert
Free- Growth$399/month
- Pro$599/month
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
Kameleoon
On request- Kameleoon$undefined/year
- Priced on monthly tested users and features licensed
- Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation licensed separately
- Free trial of the prompt-based experimentation feature, with data not retained afterwards
Which should you pick?
Choose Convert if
- You need a/b testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multivariate testing.
Choose Kameleoon if
- You need visual a/b test editor.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want server-side experimentation.
Questions people ask
- Is Convert or Kameleoon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convert starts at Free and Kameleoon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convert or Kameleoon?
- Convert has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convert and On request for Kameleoon.
- Does Convert or Kameleoon run on more platforms?
- Convert runs on Web. Kameleoon runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Convert for free?
- Yes. Convert has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kameleoon starts at On request.
- What is Convert best used for?
- Convert is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing for conversion optimization, full-stack experimentation on web and mobile, sequential testing and statistical confidence tracking. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing for conversion optimization and full-stack experimentation on web and mobile are not what Kameleoon is typically brought in for.
- What can Convert do that Kameleoon cannot?
- Convert covers A/B testing, Multivariate testing, Analytics, API access. Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor, Server-side experimentation, Feature flags, Anti-flicker engine.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convert: What is the starting price for Convert?
The Growth plan starts at $399/month (or $299/month billed annually for 25% savings) with 100K monthly tested users, 5 projects, and 5 active experiences per project.
SourceKameleoon: Does Kameleoon publish pricing?
No. Pricing depends on monthly tested users and which capabilities you licence, and requires a sales conversation.
Convert: What is the difference between Growth and Pro plans?
Both cap at 100K tested users/month, but Pro ($599/month or $420/month annual) adds 30 active projects (vs 5), unlimited experiences per project (vs 5), unlimited domains (vs 10), multivariate testing, full-stack testing, sequential testing, and phone support.
SourceKameleoon: Can I keep data in the EU?
Yes. EU hosting and a GDPR-first consent model are among the main reasons European buyers shortlist it.
Convert: How much does the Enterprise plan cost?
Enterprise pricing is available 'on request.' It supports 1M+ monthly tested users (12M+ annually), unlimited projects, experiences, and domains, plus dedicated account manager and custom terms.
SourceKameleoon: Does it do feature flags as well as A/B tests?
Yes, through server-side SDKs, sharing audiences and results with the visual testing side.
Convert: What is the cost to exceed my monthly tested user limit?
Growth overages cost $399 per 100K additional users. Pro/Enterprise overages cost $699 per 250K additional users. Customers can also upgrade mid-cycle at any time.
SourceKameleoon: How does it compare with Optimizely?
Similar capability at a smaller scale. Kameleoon's advantages are European data residency and an independent vendor; Optimizely's are ecosystem size and partner availability.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convert vs Crazy Egg
- Convert vs VWO
- Convert vs Ruler Analytics
- Convert vs Northbeam
- Convert vs AB Tasty
- Convert vs Optimizely
- Convert vs Google Optimize
- Convert vs Lucky Orange
- Convert vs Unbounce
- Convert vs Triple Whale
- Convert vs Instapage
- Convert vs June
- Convert vs Optimove
- Convert vs Postmark
- Convert vs Postscript
- Convert vs Roxhill
- Convert vs Simple Analytics
- Convert vs Supermetrics
- Convert vs GrowthBook
- Convert vs Split
- Convert vs Eppo
- Convert vs Insomnia
- Convert vs Appium
- Convert vs TestRail
- Convert vs Qase
- Convert vs Applitools
- Convert vs Vitest
- Convert vs k6
- Convert vs PractiTest
- Convert vs Ranorex
- Convert vs Sauce Labs
- Convert vs Xray Test Management
- Convert vs Zephyr Scale
- Convert vs JUnit
- Convert vs WebdriverIO
- Kameleoon vs Crazy Egg
- Kameleoon vs VWO
- Kameleoon vs Ruler Analytics
- Kameleoon vs Northbeam
- Kameleoon vs AB Tasty
- Kameleoon vs Optimizely
- Kameleoon vs Google Optimize
- Kameleoon vs Lucky Orange
- Kameleoon vs Unbounce
- Kameleoon vs Triple Whale
- Kameleoon vs Instapage
- Kameleoon vs June
- Kameleoon vs Optimove
- Kameleoon vs Postmark
- Kameleoon vs Postscript
- Kameleoon vs Roxhill
- Kameleoon vs Simple Analytics
- Kameleoon vs Supermetrics
- Kameleoon vs GrowthBook
- Kameleoon vs Split
- Kameleoon vs Eppo
- Kameleoon vs Insomnia
- Kameleoon vs Appium
- Kameleoon vs TestRail
- Kameleoon vs Qase
- Kameleoon vs Applitools
- Kameleoon vs Vitest
- Kameleoon vs k6
- Kameleoon vs PractiTest
- Kameleoon vs Ranorex
- Kameleoon vs Sauce Labs
- Kameleoon vs Xray Test Management
- Kameleoon vs Zephyr Scale
- Kameleoon vs JUnit
- Kameleoon vs WebdriverIO