Marketing · head to head
Convert vs Eppo

Eppo
Testing
Warehouse-native experimentation and feature flagging, now sold as Datadog Experiments
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convert has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convert pricing is driven by monthly tested users, starting at $399 per month for 100,000 monthly tested users on Growth and $599 on Pro; Eppo datadog acquired Eppo in May 2025 and is folding it into Datadog Experiments, so you are now buying a component of an observability suite rather than an independent product, and roadmap priorities will follow Datadog’s bundle strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Convert covers A/B testing, Eppo covers Warehouse-native analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convert and Eppo actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convert
- A/B testing
- Multivariate testing
- Analytics
- API access
- Google Analytics
- SSL encryption
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
Only in Eppo
- Warehouse-native analysis
- Sequential testing
- CUPED variance reduction
- Feature flagging
- Metric governance
- Contextual bandits
- Experiment scorecards
- Heterogeneous effect analysis
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convert
- A/B and multivariate testing for conversion optimizationnot Eppo
- Full-stack experimentation on web and mobilenot Eppo
- Sequential testing and statistical confidence trackingnot Eppo
Eppo
- A company whose experiment results have repeatedly disagreed with the analytics team’s own numbers because the two systems define revenue differentlynot Convert
- A product organisation with low traffic on a key surface that needs variance reduction to reach a decision in weeks instead of monthsnot Convert
- A team that must keep user-level event data inside its own warehouse for regulatory reasons and cannot ship it to a third-party analytics vendornot Convert
- An existing Datadog customer consolidating product analytics, feature flags and experimentation onto one vendor agreementnot Convert
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convert
- Pricing is driven by monthly tested users, starting at $399 per month for 100,000 monthly tested users on Growth and $599 on Pro
- Single Sign-On requires the Pro plan at $599 per month
- Multivariate testing, multi-page testing, full stack and feature flags, sequential testing and raw test data export are all withheld from the Growth plan
- Phone support, change history and guided onboarding require Pro
- The advertised $299 and $420 per month rates require paying the full year up front at $3,588 or $5,040
- The Enterprise plan is price on request, is only available as an annual plan, and its data segregation feature carries additional costs
- Listed prices exclude VAT, GST and other taxes, which are added at checkout
- Above 5 million monthly tested users there is no published rate
Eppo
- Datadog acquired Eppo in May 2025 and is folding it into Datadog Experiments, so you are now buying a component of an observability suite rather than an independent product, and roadmap priorities will follow Datadog’s bundle strategy.
- No pricing is published anywhere, before or after the acquisition; the site offers only a demo request, so cost cannot be estimated without a sales process and is likely to be quoted alongside a wider Datadog contract.
- Because analysis runs in your warehouse, Eppo shifts compute cost onto your Snowflake or BigQuery bill; a large experiment programme with frequent recomputation raises a line item that does not appear in the Eppo quote at all.
- Results are only as fresh as the pipeline feeding the warehouse, so teams used to near-real-time dashboards from an event-based tool will wait hours for updated numbers, which slows down the fast iteration loops some product teams rely on.
- It assumes a mature data stack with a warehouse, defined metrics and analysts who can maintain them; an organisation without that has to build the data foundation first, which makes the real adoption cost far larger than the licence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convert
Free- Growth$399/month
- Pro$599/month
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
Eppo
On request- Eppo, now Datadog Experiments$undefined/year
- Warehouse-native experiment analysis
- Feature flagging and assignment
- Sequential testing and CUPED variance reduction
Which should you pick?
Choose Convert if
- You need a/b testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multivariate testing.
Choose Eppo if
- You need warehouse-native analysis.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want sequential testing.
Questions people ask
- Is Convert or Eppo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convert starts at Free and Eppo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convert or Eppo?
- Convert has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convert and On request for Eppo.
- Does Convert or Eppo run on more platforms?
- Convert runs on Web. Eppo runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use Convert for free?
- Yes. Convert has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Eppo starts at On request.
- What is Convert best used for?
- Convert is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing for conversion optimization, full-stack experimentation on web and mobile, sequential testing and statistical confidence tracking. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing for conversion optimization and full-stack experimentation on web and mobile are not what Eppo is typically brought in for.
- What can Convert do that Eppo cannot?
- Convert covers A/B testing, Multivariate testing, Analytics, API access. Eppo covers Warehouse-native analysis, Sequential testing, CUPED variance reduction, Feature flagging.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convert: What is the starting price for Convert?
The Growth plan starts at $399/month (or $299/month billed annually for 25% savings) with 100K monthly tested users, 5 projects, and 5 active experiences per project.
SourceEppo: Is Eppo still a separate product?
It is still sold and supported, but Datadog acquired it in May 2025 and it is branded as Datadog Experiments. Buy it expecting a Datadog product roadmap.
Convert: What is the difference between Growth and Pro plans?
Both cap at 100K tested users/month, but Pro ($599/month or $420/month annual) adds 30 active projects (vs 5), unlimited experiences per project (vs 5), unlimited domains (vs 10), multivariate testing, full-stack testing, sequential testing, and phone support.
SourceEppo: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. There is no pricing page, only a demo request, and pricing is now likely bundled into a Datadog agreement.
Convert: How much does the Enterprise plan cost?
Enterprise pricing is available 'on request.' It supports 1M+ monthly tested users (12M+ annually), unlimited projects, experiences, and domains, plus dedicated account manager and custom terms.
SourceEppo: Does it need a data warehouse?
Yes. Warehouse-native analysis is the whole architecture. Without Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift or Databricks there is no product.
Convert: What is the cost to exceed my monthly tested user limit?
Growth overages cost $399 per 100K additional users. Pro/Enterprise overages cost $699 per 250K additional users. Customers can also upgrade mid-cycle at any time.
SourceEppo: Does it include feature flags?
Yes. Assignment and measurement come from the same system, which is the main reason teams pick it over pairing a flag tool with a separate analysis tool.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convert vs Crazy Egg
- Convert vs VWO
- Convert vs Ruler Analytics
- Convert vs Northbeam
- Convert vs AB Tasty
- Convert vs Optimizely
- Convert vs Google Optimize
- Convert vs Lucky Orange
- Convert vs Unbounce
- Convert vs Triple Whale
- Convert vs Instapage
- Convert vs June
- Convert vs Optimove
- Convert vs Postmark
- Convert vs Postscript
- Convert vs Roxhill
- Convert vs Simple Analytics
- Convert vs Supermetrics
- Convert vs GrowthBook
- Convert vs Split
- Convert vs Kameleoon
- Convert vs Xray Test Management
- Convert vs Qase
- Convert vs Tricentis Tosca
- Convert vs Appium
- Convert vs TestRail
- Convert vs Katalon
- Convert vs Zephyr Scale
- Convert vs TestNG
- Convert vs Percy
- Convert vs Applitools
- Convert vs pytest
- Convert vs Testsigma
- Convert vs Vitest
- Convert vs Jest
- Eppo vs Crazy Egg
- Eppo vs VWO
- Eppo vs Ruler Analytics
- Eppo vs Northbeam
- Eppo vs AB Tasty
- Eppo vs Optimizely
- Eppo vs Google Optimize
- Eppo vs Lucky Orange
- Eppo vs Unbounce
- Eppo vs Triple Whale
- Eppo vs Instapage
- Eppo vs June
- Eppo vs Optimove
- Eppo vs Postmark
- Eppo vs Postscript
- Eppo vs Roxhill
- Eppo vs Simple Analytics
- Eppo vs Supermetrics
- Eppo vs GrowthBook
- Eppo vs Split
- Eppo vs Kameleoon
- Eppo vs Xray Test Management
- Eppo vs Qase
- Eppo vs Tricentis Tosca
- Eppo vs Appium
- Eppo vs TestRail
- Eppo vs Katalon
- Eppo vs Zephyr Scale
- Eppo vs TestNG
- Eppo vs Percy
- Eppo vs Applitools
- Eppo vs pytest
- Eppo vs Testsigma
- Eppo vs Vitest
- Eppo vs Jest

