Softwr

Marketing · head to head

Google Optimize vs Kameleoon

Google Optimize logo

Google Optimize

Marketing

A/B testing for Google Analytics

From
Free
Rated
-
Kameleoon logo

Kameleoon

Testing

A/B testing and feature experimentation with a hybrid client and server-side engine

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Google Optimize has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Google Optimize google Optimize and Optimize 360 were sunset and are no longer available as of September 30, 2023; Kameleoon no rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
  • They diverge on capability: Google Optimize covers A/B testing, Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Google Optimize and Kameleoon actually diverge.

Attributes where Google Optimize and Kameleoon differ
AttributeGoogle OptimizeKameleoon
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android
CategoryMarketingTesting
Founded1998Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Google Optimize

  • A/B testing
  • Google Analytics integration
  • Visual editor
  • Real-time analytics
  • Google Analytics
  • Google Tag Manager
  • Google's security
  • Cloud deployment

Only in Kameleoon

  • Visual A/B test editor
  • Server-side experimentation
  • Feature flags
  • Anti-flicker engine
  • AI personalisation
  • EU data hosting
  • Shared audiences
  • Statistics options

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Google Optimize

  • A/B and multivariate testing of web pages tied to Google Analytics goalsnot Kameleoon
  • Personalising page content for defined audience segmentsnot Kameleoon
  • Redirect tests between alternative landing page URLsnot Kameleoon

Kameleoon

  • A European retailer whose legal team requires EU-hosted experimentation data and has ruled out US-only vendorsnot Google Optimize
  • A team running both marketing page tests and product feature rollouts that wants one results engine rather than two disagreeing onesnot Google Optimize
  • A media site where client-side flicker on a test variant is visibly damaging the reading experiencenot Google Optimize
  • An organisation re-tendering experimentation after Optimizely or VWO pricing changes and wanting an independent European vendornot Google Optimize

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Google Optimize

  • Google Optimize and Optimize 360 were sunset and are no longer available as of September 30, 2023
  • Any experiments and personalizations still running on that date were ended by Google
  • Google directs former users to third-party A/B testing tools, naming AB Tasty, Optimizely and VWO, rather than a replacement Google product

Kameleoon

  • No rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
  • Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation are licensed as separate capabilities, so the unified platform story costs materially more than the entry configuration most buyers are first quoted.
  • The partner and agency ecosystem is concentrated in France and continental Europe; a buyer in North America or Asia will find fewer implementation specialists and less community knowledge than for Optimizely or VWO.
  • The integration catalogue is smaller than the market leaders, so a stack built on less common analytics or CDP tooling may need custom work that a larger vendor would cover natively.
  • Client-side visual testing still carries the structural problems of the approach, including performance cost and single-page-application fragility; the anti-flicker engine reduces the symptom but does not remove the dependency on the DOM staying stable.

Pricing, plan by plan

Google Optimize

Free
  • FreeFree
    • A/B testing
    • Google Analytics integration
    • Visual editor

Kameleoon

On request
  • Kameleoon$undefined/year
    • Priced on monthly tested users and features licensed
    • Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation licensed separately
    • Free trial of the prompt-based experimentation feature, with data not retained afterwards

Which should you pick?

Choose Google Optimize if

  • You need a/b testing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want google analytics integration.

Choose Kameleoon if

  • You need visual a/b test editor.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want server-side experimentation.

Questions people ask

Is Google Optimize or Kameleoon better?
Neither clearly leads. Google Optimize starts at Free and Kameleoon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Google Optimize or Kameleoon?
Google Optimize has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Google Optimize and On request for Kameleoon.
Does Google Optimize or Kameleoon run on more platforms?
Google Optimize runs on Web. Kameleoon runs on Web, iOS, Android.
Can I use Google Optimize for free?
Yes. Google Optimize has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kameleoon starts at On request.
What is Google Optimize best used for?
Google Optimize is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing of web pages tied to google analytics goals, personalising page content for defined audience segments, redirect tests between alternative landing page urls. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing of web pages tied to google analytics goals and personalising page content for defined audience segments are not what Kameleoon is typically brought in for.
What can Google Optimize do that Kameleoon cannot?
Google Optimize covers A/B testing, Google Analytics integration, Visual editor, Real-time analytics. Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor, Server-side experimentation, Feature flags, Anti-flicker engine.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Google Optimize: Is Google Optimize still available?

No. Google Optimize and Optimize 360 were discontinued as of September 30, 2023. Google recommends third-party A/B testing integrations such as AB Tasty, Optimizely, and VWO as replacements.

Source
Kameleoon: Does Kameleoon publish pricing?

No. Pricing depends on monthly tested users and which capabilities you licence, and requires a sales conversation.

Kameleoon: Can I keep data in the EU?

Yes. EU hosting and a GDPR-first consent model are among the main reasons European buyers shortlist it.

Kameleoon: Does it do feature flags as well as A/B tests?

Yes, through server-side SDKs, sharing audiences and results with the visual testing side.

Kameleoon: How does it compare with Optimizely?

Similar capability at a smaller scale. Kameleoon's advantages are European data residency and an independent vendor; Optimizely's are ecosystem size and partner availability.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads