Technology · head to head
Close vs Deno

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Free plan
- No

Deno
Developer Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Deno has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); Deno egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and Deno actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that Close does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot Deno
- Outbound salesnot Deno
- Lead managementnot Deno
- Sales engagementnot Deno
- Pipeline trackingnot Deno
Deno
- Running TypeScript natively without transpilation overheadnot Close
- Migrating Node.js applications to secure-by-default runtimenot Close
- Deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlesslynot Close
- Consolidating developer tools into single binarynot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Deno
- Egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- CPU time overage is $0.10/hour on Pro and Builder tiers, adding to costs for compute-intensive workloads
- Enterprise pricing is not disclosed; requires sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Deno
Free- FreeFree
- 1 million requests/month
- 20GB egress bandwidth
- 10 apps
- Pro$20/month
- 5 million requests/month
- 200GB egress
- 50 apps
- Builder$200/month
- 25 million requests/month
- 2,000GB egress
- 10,000 apps
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom limits on all metrics
- 99.95% reliability SLA
- Email support with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or Deno better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and Deno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or Deno?
- Deno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Close and Free for Deno.
- Does Close or Deno run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. Deno runs on Web.
- Can I use Deno for free?
- Yes. Deno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what Deno is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that Deno cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceDeno: How much does Deno Deploy cost?
Deno Deploy offers a free tier at $0/month, Pro at $20/month, and Builder at $200/month. Enterprise has custom pricing. All plans include base request and bandwidth limits, with overage charges for additional usage.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceDeno: What are Deno Deploy's overage charges?
Egress bandwidth overages cost $0.20 per GB. CPU time overages are $0.10 per hour on Pro and Builder tiers. Memory time and KV database operations also incur charges beyond included limits.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceDeno: How many apps can I deploy on Deno's free plan?
The free tier includes 10 apps with up to 1 concurrent build. Pro tier supports 50 apps with 3 concurrent builds, and Builder supports 10,000 apps with 20 concurrent builds.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceDeno: How many team members can access Deno Deploy?
The free tier supports up to 3 team members. Pro supports 10 team members. Builder supports 25 team members. Enterprise has custom seat limits.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs Vim
- Close vs Whimsical
- Close vs Apache Hadoop
- Close vs Turborepo
- Close vs ESLint
- Close vs pnpm
- Close vs Visual Studio Code
- Close vs Jitsu
- Close vs Argo CD
- Close vs Git
- Close vs Soketi
- Close vs Bazel
- Close vs Pants Build
- Close vs Tilt
- Close vs Dagger
- Close vs RAD Studio
- Close vs Refact
- Close vs Restate
- Close vs RubyMine
- Close vs SonarQube
- Deno vs Attio
- Deno vs Drift
- Deno vs Asana
- Deno vs Docker
- Deno vs Mozilla Firefox
- Deno vs Userpilot
- Deno vs Personetics
- Deno vs Superhuman
- Deno vs ClickUp
- Deno vs Linear
- Deno vs Notion
- Deno vs Amplitude
- Deno vs Postman
- Deno vs Raycast
- Deno vs Vim
- Deno vs Whimsical
- Deno vs Apache Hadoop
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs ESLint
- Deno vs pnpm
- Deno vs Visual Studio Code
- Deno vs Jitsu
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs Soketi
- Deno vs Bazel
- Deno vs Pants Build
- Deno vs Tilt
- Deno vs Dagger
- Deno vs RAD Studio
- Deno vs Refact
- Deno vs Restate
- Deno vs RubyMine
- Deno vs SonarQube
