Technology · head to head
Close vs ESLint

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only ESLint has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and ESLint actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in ESLint
Nothing recorded that Close does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot ESLint
- Outbound salesnot ESLint
- Lead managementnot ESLint
- Sales engagementnot ESLint
- Pipeline trackingnot ESLint
ESLint
- Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot Close
- Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot Close
- Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot Close
- Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot Close
- Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
ESLint
- Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
- Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
ESLint
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Choose ESLint if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or ESLint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and ESLint at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or ESLint?
- ESLint has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Close and Free for ESLint.
- Does Close or ESLint run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
- Can I use ESLint for free?
- Yes. ESLint has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what ESLint is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that ESLint cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?
Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceESLint: How much does ESLint cost?
ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?
Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs Vim
- Close vs Whimsical
- Close vs Apache Hadoop
- Close vs Turborepo
- Close vs Prettier
- Close vs Deno
- Close vs Fig
- Close vs Vite
- Close vs Harness
- Close vs Ansible
- Close vs Buildkite
- Close vs Argo CD
- Close vs GitLab CI/CD
- Close vs HCP Terraform
- Close vs Helm
- Close vs Earthly
- Close vs Eclipse IDE
- Close vs Moonrepo
- Close vs Nx Cloud
- Close vs Pants Build
- ESLint vs Attio
- ESLint vs Drift
- ESLint vs Asana
- ESLint vs Docker
- ESLint vs Mozilla Firefox
- ESLint vs Userpilot
- ESLint vs Personetics
- ESLint vs Superhuman
- ESLint vs ClickUp
- ESLint vs Linear
- ESLint vs Notion
- ESLint vs Amplitude
- ESLint vs Postman
- ESLint vs Raycast
- ESLint vs Vim
- ESLint vs Whimsical
- ESLint vs Apache Hadoop
- ESLint vs Turborepo
- ESLint vs Prettier
- ESLint vs Deno
- ESLint vs Fig
- ESLint vs Vite
- ESLint vs Harness
- ESLint vs Ansible
- ESLint vs Buildkite
- ESLint vs Argo CD
- ESLint vs GitLab CI/CD
- ESLint vs HCP Terraform
- ESLint vs Helm
- ESLint vs Earthly
- ESLint vs Eclipse IDE
- ESLint vs Moonrepo
- ESLint vs Nx Cloud
- ESLint vs Pants Build

