Construction · head to head
Clearstory vs On-Screen Takeoff

Clearstory
Construction
Digital change order and time and materials tag exchange between subcontractors and general contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clearstory value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.; On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- They diverge on capability: Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clearstory and On-Screen Takeoff actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clearstory | On-Screen Takeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clearstory
- Digital time and materials tags
- Review and signature routing
- Change order log
- Cost exposure reporting
- Field mobile capture
- Document export
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clearstory
- A speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signednot On-Screen Takeoff
- A general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeoutnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after itnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large projectnot On-Screen Takeoff
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot Clearstory
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot Clearstory
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot Clearstory
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot Clearstory
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clearstory
- Value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.
- It documents extra work but does not settle it; a general contractor determined not to pay is not persuaded by better paperwork, only better positioned to be argued with.
- Field staff have to complete tags properly for the record to hold up, and the discipline required is the same discipline that was failing on paper.
- Poor connectivity in basements, plant rooms and lift shafts is exactly where extra work gets documented, so offline reliability needs testing before rollout rather than after.
- It overlaps with change management already present in Procore and similar platforms, so buyers must be clear about which system holds the authoritative log or they will maintain two.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Clearstory
On request- Clearstory$undefined/year
- Digital time and materials tags
- Change order log
- Mobile field capture
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
Which should you pick?
Choose Clearstory if
- You need digital time and materials tags.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want review and signature routing.
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Questions people ask
- Is Clearstory or On-Screen Takeoff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clearstory starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clearstory or On-Screen Takeoff?
- Clearstory starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request.
- Does Clearstory or On-Screen Takeoff run on more platforms?
- Clearstory runs on Web, iOS, Android. On-Screen Takeoff runs on Windows.
- What is Clearstory best used for?
- Clearstory is most often used for a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed, a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout, a project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after it, a contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large project. Of those, a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed and a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout are not what On-Screen Takeoff is typically brought in for.
- What can Clearstory do that On-Screen Takeoff cannot?
- Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Review and signature routing, Change order log, Cost exposure reporting. On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clearstory: Is Clearstory for subcontractors or general contractors?
Both, because the workflow crosses between them. The subcontractor originates the tag, the general contractor reviews it, and adoption works best when the general contractor mandates it.
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
Clearstory: Does it replace change management in Procore?
It can, for time and materials tags and the change order log, but you must decide which system is authoritative. Running both without that decision creates reconciliation work.
On-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
Clearstory: What happens on sites without signal?
Tags are captured on the device and synchronised later. Test that path with photographs attached before relying on it.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
Related pages
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- Clearstory vs Procore
- Clearstory vs eSUB
- Clearstory vs Raken
- Clearstory vs Document Crunch
- Clearstory vs Siteline
- Clearstory vs Bridgit Bravo
- Clearstory vs GCPay
- Clearstory vs Kojo
- Clearstory vs Assignar
- Clearstory vs ConstructConnect
- Clearstory vs Reconstruct
- Clearstory vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Clearstory vs Adaptive
- Clearstory vs ALICE Technologies
- Clearstory vs B2W Estimate
- Clearstory vs Billd
- Clearstory vs Bluebeam Revu
- Clearstory vs Sage Estimating
- Clearstory vs RIB CostX
- Clearstory vs Cubit Estimating
- Clearstory vs Togal.AI
- Clearstory vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Clearstory vs Handoff
- Clearstory vs HCSS
- Clearstory vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Clearstory vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Clearstory vs Revit
- Clearstory vs Smartsheet
- Clearstory vs Vectorworks Architect
- Clearstory vs Viewpoint Vista
- Clearstory vs BricsCAD BIM
- Clearstory vs Briq
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Procore
- On-Screen Takeoff vs eSUB
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Raken
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Document Crunch
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bridgit Bravo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs GCPay
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Kojo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Assignar
- On-Screen Takeoff vs ConstructConnect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Reconstruct
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Adaptive
- On-Screen Takeoff vs ALICE Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Billd
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Cubit Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Briq
