Construction · head to head
Cubit Estimating vs On-Screen Takeoff

Cubit Estimating
Construction
Australian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
- From
- 167/month
- Rated
- -

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cubit Estimating every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.; On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- They diverge on capability: Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cubit Estimating and On-Screen Takeoff actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cubit Estimating | On-Screen Takeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | 167/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cubit Estimating
- Integrated takeoff and estimate
- Calculation and rate sheets
- Price list management
- Bills of quantities
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Revision management
- AI Estimating add-on
- Job collaboration
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cubit Estimating
- An Australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement toolnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local conventionnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tendernot On-Screen Takeoff
- A small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is publishednot On-Screen Takeoff
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot Cubit Estimating
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot Cubit Estimating
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot Cubit Estimating
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot Cubit Estimating
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cubit Estimating
- Every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- BIM and IFC takeoff sits only in Enterprise at $250 per user per month, meaning a builder who receives models rather than PDFs is pushed to the top tier whether or not it needs collaboration features.
- The product is Windows only with no macOS or browser client, which excludes practices standardised on Macs unless they run virtualisation.
- Rate libraries, measurement conventions and BOQ structures follow Australian practice, so buyers outside Australia and New Zealand inherit a method that does not match their local standard forms.
- The AI Estimating add-on is priced at an explicitly temporary introductory rate, so a firm building the feature into its workflow is accepting an unspecified future increase on top of the seat price.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Cubit Estimating
167/month- Standard$167/month
- Integrated estimating and takeoff
- Calculation sheets, rate sheets and price lists
- Basic job management
- Professional$222/month
- Everything in Standard
- Code grouping
- Custom reporting
- Enterprise$250/month
- Everything in Professional
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Multi-user job collaboration
- AI Estimating add-on$20/month
- Automated element recognition
- Works with any edition
- Introductory rate the vendor says will increase
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
Which should you pick?
Choose Cubit Estimating if
- You need integrated takeoff and estimate.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want calculation and rate sheets.
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Questions people ask
- Is Cubit Estimating or On-Screen Takeoff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and On-Screen Takeoff at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cubit Estimating or On-Screen Takeoff?
- Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and On-Screen Takeoff at On request.
- Does Cubit Estimating or On-Screen Takeoff run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Cubit Estimating best used for?
- Cubit Estimating is most often used for an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool, a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention, a subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tender, a small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is published. Of those, an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool and a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention are not what On-Screen Takeoff is typically brought in for.
- What can Cubit Estimating do that On-Screen Takeoff cannot?
- Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Calculation and rate sheets, Price list management, Bills of quantities. On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cubit Estimating: What does Cubit actually cost?
Standard $167, Professional $222 and Enterprise $250 per user per month on annual billing, in Australian dollars excluding GST. Monthly billing is about 16 per cent more.
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
Cubit Estimating: Can I get BIM takeoff without the Enterprise tier?
No. IFC model takeoff is an Enterprise feature only.
On-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
Cubit Estimating: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Cubit Estimating is subscription only with a minimum twelve month commitment.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
Cubit Estimating: Does it suit contractors outside Australia?
It works, but rate libraries and BOQ conventions follow Australian standards, so buyers elsewhere do more setup than a locally built alternative would need.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
Related pages
More on Cubit Estimating
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- Cubit Estimating vs Togal.AI
- Cubit Estimating vs PlanSwift
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage Estimating
- Cubit Estimating vs Bluebeam Revu
- Cubit Estimating vs RIB CostX
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Cubit Estimating vs Handoff
- Cubit Estimating vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs B2W Estimate
- Cubit Estimating vs Dalux
- Cubit Estimating vs Bridgit Bravo
- Cubit Estimating vs Builderbox
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildots
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildxact
- Cubit Estimating vs Chief Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Clearstory
- Cubit Estimating vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Cubit Estimating vs Siteline
- Cubit Estimating vs Revit
- Cubit Estimating vs Smartsheet
- Cubit Estimating vs Vectorworks Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Viewpoint Vista
- Cubit Estimating vs BricsCAD BIM
- Cubit Estimating vs Briq
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs PlanSwift
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Dalux
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bridgit Bravo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Builderbox
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Buildots
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Buildxact
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Chief Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Clearstory
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Briq
