Construction · head to head
On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RIB CostX
Construction
2D and BIM quantity takeoff with live-linked estimating workbooks for quantity surveyors and estimators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats; RIB CostX pricing is not published anywhere and is quoted per package and per seat through regional resellers, so two firms of similar size routinely pay materially different rates for the same configuration.
- They diverge on capability: On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, RIB CostX covers 2D drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which On-Screen Takeoff and RIB CostX actually diverge.
| Attribute | On-Screen Takeoff | RIB CostX |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
Only in RIB CostX
- 2D drawing takeoff
- BIM and 3D takeoff
- Live-linked workbooks
- Drawing revision comparison
- Bill of quantities production
- Rate libraries
- Subcontractor comparison
- CostX Viewer
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot RIB CostX
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot RIB CostX
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot RIB CostX
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot RIB CostX
RIB CostX
- A quantity surveying practice that must issue a formatted bill of quantities under NRM or SMM7 and cannot do so from a generic takeoff toolnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A contractor tendering a job where the client reissues drawings mid-tender, needing revision comparison so only changed areas are remeasurednot On-Screen Takeoff
- An estimating department moving from paper and Excel to model-based measurement while keeping the same rate library and bill structurenot On-Screen Takeoff
- A cost consultant producing early-stage elemental cost plans from partial models, then refining the same workbook as design detail arrivesnot On-Screen Takeoff
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
RIB CostX
- Pricing is not published anywhere and is quoted per package and per seat through regional resellers, so two firms of similar size routinely pay materially different rates for the same configuration.
- It is Windows desktop software with heavy graphics demands; there is no meaningful macOS or browser option, which rules it out for practices standardised on Apple hardware.
- The learning curve is steep enough that firms typically budget formal training, and an estimator productive in a rival tool takes weeks rather than days to reach the same output here.
- RIB is owned by Schneider Electric, whose strategic interest is the wider RIB construction cloud, so a buyer choosing CostX today is betting on continued investment in a desktop estimating product inside a group focused elsewhere.
- BIM takeoff is only as good as the model, and on projects where the model is modelled for coordination rather than measurement the automatic quantities need enough manual checking that the time saving largely disappears.
Pricing, plan by plan
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
RIB CostX
On request- CostX Quantify$undefined/year
- 2D and BIM takeoff
- Measurement export
- No integrated estimating workbook
- CostX Core$undefined/year
- Takeoff plus live-linked workbooks
- Rate libraries
- Standard reporting
- CostX Complete$undefined/year
- Full BIM takeoff
- Advanced workbooks and bills of quantities
- Subcontractor comparison
Which should you pick?
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Choose RIB CostX if
- You need 2d drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want bim and 3d takeoff.
Questions people ask
- Is On-Screen Takeoff or RIB CostX better?
- Neither clearly leads. On-Screen Takeoff starts at On request and RIB CostX at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, On-Screen Takeoff or RIB CostX?
- On-Screen Takeoff starts at On request and RIB CostX at On request.
- Does On-Screen Takeoff or RIB CostX run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is On-Screen Takeoff best used for?
- On-Screen Takeoff is most often used for a drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a week, an estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floor, a flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimators, a trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually released. Of those, a drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a week and an estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floor are not what RIB CostX is typically brought in for.
- What can On-Screen Takeoff do that RIB CostX cannot?
- On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling. RIB CostX covers 2D drawing takeoff, BIM and 3D takeoff, Live-linked workbooks, Drawing revision comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
RIB CostX: How much does RIB CostX cost?
RIB does not publish prices. It is quoted per package (Quantify, Core or Complete) and per seat, usually through a regional reseller.
On-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
RIB CostX: Is a perpetual licence available?
RIB has historically offered both perpetual and subscription licensing, with subscription now the default push. Ask explicitly, because the perpetual option is not advertised.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
RIB CostX: Does it do BIM takeoff or just 2D?
Both. Complete handles IFC and Revit models; Quantify and Core differ in workbook capability rather than measurement.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
RIB CostX: Who is it for?
Quantity surveyors and estimators in markets that use bills of quantities: UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East and South Africa above all.
RIB CostX: Can we open estimates without a licence?
A free CostX Viewer lets others open and inspect measured drawings and workbooks without a full seat.
Related pages
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Cubit Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Briq
- On-Screen Takeoff vs PlanSwift
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Dalux
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Buildots
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Autodesk Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Assignar
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Billd
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bridgit Bravo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Builderbox
- RIB CostX vs Bluebeam Revu
- RIB CostX vs Sage Estimating
- RIB CostX vs Cubit Estimating
- RIB CostX vs Togal.AI
- RIB CostX vs B2W Estimate
- RIB CostX vs STACK Construction Technologies
- RIB CostX vs Handoff
- RIB CostX vs HCSS
- RIB CostX vs HCSS HeavyBid
- RIB CostX vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- RIB CostX vs Siteline
- RIB CostX vs Revit
- RIB CostX vs Smartsheet
- RIB CostX vs Vectorworks Architect
- RIB CostX vs Viewpoint Vista
- RIB CostX vs BricsCAD BIM
- RIB CostX vs Briq
- RIB CostX vs PlanSwift
- RIB CostX vs Dalux
- RIB CostX vs Buildots
- RIB CostX vs Autodesk Revit
- RIB CostX vs Assignar
- RIB CostX vs Billd
- RIB CostX vs Bridgit Bravo
- RIB CostX vs Builderbox
