Construction · head to head
On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats; Revit windows-only software with no native macOS support, limiting adoption among Mac-based design teams
- They diverge on capability: On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revit covers BIM modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which On-Screen Takeoff and Revit actually diverge.
| Attribute | On-Screen Takeoff | Revit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $380/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Founded | Unknown | 1982 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
Only in Revit
- BIM modeling
- Parametric design
- Collaboration
- Documentation
- Analysis
- AutoCAD
- 3ds Max
- Navisworks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot Revit
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot Revit
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot Revit
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot Revit
Revit
- Building designnot On-Screen Takeoff
- Construction documentationnot On-Screen Takeoff
- MEP coordinationnot On-Screen Takeoff
- Structural analysisnot On-Screen Takeoff
- Project collaborationnot On-Screen Takeoff
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
Revit
- Windows-only software with no native macOS support, limiting adoption among Mac-based design teams
- Heavy computational requirements make it difficult to run on mid-range hardware, creating high infrastructure costs
Pricing, plan by plan
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
Revit
$380/month- Monthly$380/month
- Full BIM modeling
- 3D visualization
- Collaboration tools
- Annual$2910/year
- Full BIM modeling
- 3D visualization
- Collaboration tools
- Revit LT$70/month
- Basic BIM features
- Reduced capability
Which should you pick?
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Choose Revit if
- You need bim modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want parametric design.
Questions people ask
- Is On-Screen Takeoff or Revit better?
- Neither clearly leads. On-Screen Takeoff starts at On request and Revit at $380/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, On-Screen Takeoff or Revit?
- On-Screen Takeoff starts at On request and Revit at $380/month.
- Does On-Screen Takeoff or Revit run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is On-Screen Takeoff best used for?
- On-Screen Takeoff is most often used for a drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a week, an estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floor, a flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimators, a trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually released. Of those, a drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a week and an estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floor are not what Revit is typically brought in for.
- What can On-Screen Takeoff do that Revit cannot?
- On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling. Revit covers BIM modeling, Parametric design, Collaboration, Documentation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
Revit: What is Revit's pricing model?
Revit 2026 costs $380 per month or $2,910 annually per user. Flex plans start at $300 for 100 tokens (10 days of use over one year). Revit LT costs $70/month for basic BIM features.
SourceOn-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
Related pages
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Cubit Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Briq
- On-Screen Takeoff vs SketchUp
- On-Screen Takeoff vs ArchiCAD
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Dalux
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Reconstruct
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet Construction
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Builderbox
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Buildots
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sitemark
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Skydio Dock for X10
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Topcon MAGNET
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Trunk Tools
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Tekla Structures
- Revit vs Bluebeam Revu
- Revit vs Sage Estimating
- Revit vs RIB CostX
- Revit vs Cubit Estimating
- Revit vs Togal.AI
- Revit vs B2W Estimate
- Revit vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Revit vs Handoff
- Revit vs HCSS
- Revit vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Revit vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Revit vs Siteline
- Revit vs Smartsheet
- Revit vs Vectorworks Architect
- Revit vs Viewpoint Vista
- Revit vs BricsCAD BIM
- Revit vs Briq
- Revit vs SketchUp
- Revit vs ArchiCAD
- Revit vs Dalux
- Revit vs Reconstruct
- Revit vs Smartsheet Construction
- Revit vs Builderbox
- Revit vs Buildots
- Revit vs Sitemark
- Revit vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Revit vs Topcon MAGNET
- Revit vs Trunk Tools
- Revit vs Tekla Structures

