Construction · head to head
Clearstory vs Cubit Estimating

Clearstory
Construction
Digital change order and time and materials tag exchange between subcontractors and general contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Cubit Estimating
Construction
Australian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
- From
- 167/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clearstory value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.; Cubit Estimating every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- They diverge on capability: Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clearstory and Cubit Estimating actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clearstory | Cubit Estimating |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | 167/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clearstory
- Digital time and materials tags
- Review and signature routing
- Change order log
- Cost exposure reporting
- Field mobile capture
- Document export
Only in Cubit Estimating
- Integrated takeoff and estimate
- Calculation and rate sheets
- Price list management
- Bills of quantities
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Revision management
- AI Estimating add-on
- Job collaboration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clearstory
- A speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signednot Cubit Estimating
- A general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeoutnot Cubit Estimating
- A project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after itnot Cubit Estimating
- A contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large projectnot Cubit Estimating
Cubit Estimating
- An Australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement toolnot Clearstory
- A quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local conventionnot Clearstory
- A subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tendernot Clearstory
- A small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is publishednot Clearstory
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clearstory
- Value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.
- It documents extra work but does not settle it; a general contractor determined not to pay is not persuaded by better paperwork, only better positioned to be argued with.
- Field staff have to complete tags properly for the record to hold up, and the discipline required is the same discipline that was failing on paper.
- Poor connectivity in basements, plant rooms and lift shafts is exactly where extra work gets documented, so offline reliability needs testing before rollout rather than after.
- It overlaps with change management already present in Procore and similar platforms, so buyers must be clear about which system holds the authoritative log or they will maintain two.
Cubit Estimating
- Every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- BIM and IFC takeoff sits only in Enterprise at $250 per user per month, meaning a builder who receives models rather than PDFs is pushed to the top tier whether or not it needs collaboration features.
- The product is Windows only with no macOS or browser client, which excludes practices standardised on Macs unless they run virtualisation.
- Rate libraries, measurement conventions and BOQ structures follow Australian practice, so buyers outside Australia and New Zealand inherit a method that does not match their local standard forms.
- The AI Estimating add-on is priced at an explicitly temporary introductory rate, so a firm building the feature into its workflow is accepting an unspecified future increase on top of the seat price.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clearstory
On request- Clearstory$undefined/year
- Digital time and materials tags
- Change order log
- Mobile field capture
Cubit Estimating
167/month- Standard$167/month
- Integrated estimating and takeoff
- Calculation sheets, rate sheets and price lists
- Basic job management
- Professional$222/month
- Everything in Standard
- Code grouping
- Custom reporting
- Enterprise$250/month
- Everything in Professional
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Multi-user job collaboration
- AI Estimating add-on$20/month
- Automated element recognition
- Works with any edition
- Introductory rate the vendor says will increase
Which should you pick?
Choose Clearstory if
- You need digital time and materials tags.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want review and signature routing.
Choose Cubit Estimating if
- You need integrated takeoff and estimate.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want calculation and rate sheets.
Questions people ask
- Is Clearstory or Cubit Estimating better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clearstory starts at On request and Cubit Estimating at 167/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clearstory or Cubit Estimating?
- Clearstory starts at On request and Cubit Estimating at 167/month.
- Does Clearstory or Cubit Estimating run on more platforms?
- Clearstory runs on Web, iOS, Android. Cubit Estimating runs on Windows.
- What is Clearstory best used for?
- Clearstory is most often used for a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed, a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout, a project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after it, a contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large project. Of those, a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed and a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout are not what Cubit Estimating is typically brought in for.
- What can Clearstory do that Cubit Estimating cannot?
- Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Review and signature routing, Change order log, Cost exposure reporting. Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Calculation and rate sheets, Price list management, Bills of quantities.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clearstory: Is Clearstory for subcontractors or general contractors?
Both, because the workflow crosses between them. The subcontractor originates the tag, the general contractor reviews it, and adoption works best when the general contractor mandates it.
Cubit Estimating: What does Cubit actually cost?
Standard $167, Professional $222 and Enterprise $250 per user per month on annual billing, in Australian dollars excluding GST. Monthly billing is about 16 per cent more.
Clearstory: Does it replace change management in Procore?
It can, for time and materials tags and the change order log, but you must decide which system is authoritative. Running both without that decision creates reconciliation work.
Cubit Estimating: Can I get BIM takeoff without the Enterprise tier?
No. IFC model takeoff is an Enterprise feature only.
Clearstory: What happens on sites without signal?
Tags are captured on the device and synchronised later. Test that path with photographs attached before relying on it.
Cubit Estimating: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Cubit Estimating is subscription only with a minimum twelve month commitment.
Cubit Estimating: Does it suit contractors outside Australia?
It works, but rate libraries and BOQ conventions follow Australian standards, so buyers elsewhere do more setup than a locally built alternative would need.
Related pages
More on Cubit Estimating
Other head to heads
- Clearstory vs Procore
- Clearstory vs eSUB
- Clearstory vs Raken
- Clearstory vs Document Crunch
- Clearstory vs Siteline
- Clearstory vs Bridgit Bravo
- Clearstory vs GCPay
- Clearstory vs Kojo
- Clearstory vs Assignar
- Clearstory vs ConstructConnect
- Clearstory vs Reconstruct
- Clearstory vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Clearstory vs Adaptive
- Clearstory vs ALICE Technologies
- Clearstory vs B2W Estimate
- Clearstory vs Billd
- Clearstory vs Togal.AI
- Clearstory vs PlanSwift
- Clearstory vs Sage Estimating
- Clearstory vs Bluebeam Revu
- Clearstory vs RIB CostX
- Clearstory vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Clearstory vs HCSS
- Clearstory vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Clearstory vs Handoff
- Clearstory vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Clearstory vs Dalux
- Clearstory vs Builderbox
- Clearstory vs Buildots
- Clearstory vs Buildxact
- Clearstory vs Chief Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Procore
- Cubit Estimating vs eSUB
- Cubit Estimating vs Raken
- Cubit Estimating vs Document Crunch
- Cubit Estimating vs Siteline
- Cubit Estimating vs Bridgit Bravo
- Cubit Estimating vs GCPay
- Cubit Estimating vs Kojo
- Cubit Estimating vs Assignar
- Cubit Estimating vs ConstructConnect
- Cubit Estimating vs Reconstruct
- Cubit Estimating vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Cubit Estimating vs Adaptive
- Cubit Estimating vs ALICE Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs B2W Estimate
- Cubit Estimating vs Billd
- Cubit Estimating vs Togal.AI
- Cubit Estimating vs PlanSwift
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage Estimating
- Cubit Estimating vs Bluebeam Revu
- Cubit Estimating vs RIB CostX
- Cubit Estimating vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Cubit Estimating vs Handoff
- Cubit Estimating vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs Dalux
- Cubit Estimating vs Builderbox
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildots
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildxact
- Cubit Estimating vs Chief Architect
