Construction · head to head
Billd vs On-Screen Takeoff

Billd
Construction
Material financing and pay application advances for commercial subcontractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Billd the contractor carries the fee rather than the supplier, so unless the cost is bid into the job or offset by a negotiated supplier cash discount, financed material is simply more expensive material.; On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- They diverge on capability: Billd covers Material financing, On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Billd and On-Screen Takeoff actually diverge.
| Attribute | Billd | On-Screen Takeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Billd
- Material financing
- Pay App Advance
- Same-day supplier funding
- Supplier network terms
- Credit line for materials
- Online account portal
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Billd
- An electrical subcontractor that has won a job larger than its cash position can carry through the first three material buysnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A concrete contractor whose general contractor pays at 75 days while the supplier expects 30not On-Screen Takeoff
- A growing mechanical firm that wants to negotiate a supplier cash discount by paying immediately, funded by Billdnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A subcontractor with a signed pay application sitting unpaid that needs payroll covered before the cheque landsnot On-Screen Takeoff
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot Billd
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot Billd
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot Billd
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot Billd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Billd
- The contractor carries the fee rather than the supplier, so unless the cost is bid into the job or offset by a negotiated supplier cash discount, financed material is simply more expensive material.
- No rate card is published, so the effective annualised cost is only visible after underwriting and cannot be compared against a bank line or a card facility before you apply.
- A 120 day term assumes the general contractor pays roughly on time; if the GC drags past that, the subcontractor owes Billd on schedule regardless of whether it has been paid.
- This is credit, not construction software, so it adds a debt obligation and a covenant relationship to a business that a surety and a bonding agent will look at when setting bonding capacity.
- Coverage is US commercial construction, so contractors outside that market or working residential get little from it, and eligibility depends on project type and the creditworthiness of the paying party.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Billd
On request- Material Financing$undefined/year
- Supplier paid upfront
- Repayment up to 120 days
- Fee set per draw after underwriting
- Pay App Advance$undefined/year
- Advance against billed and uncollected work
- Purchase fee deducted from the advance
- Terms set per contractor
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
Which should you pick?
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Questions people ask
- Is Billd or On-Screen Takeoff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Billd starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Billd or On-Screen Takeoff?
- Billd starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request.
- Does Billd or On-Screen Takeoff run on more platforms?
- Billd runs on Web. On-Screen Takeoff runs on Windows.
- What is Billd best used for?
- Billd is most often used for an electrical subcontractor that has won a job larger than its cash position can carry through the first three material buys, a concrete contractor whose general contractor pays at 75 days while the supplier expects 30, a growing mechanical firm that wants to negotiate a supplier cash discount by paying immediately, funded by billd, a subcontractor with a signed pay application sitting unpaid that needs payroll covered before the cheque lands. Of those, an electrical subcontractor that has won a job larger than its cash position can carry through the first three material buys and a concrete contractor whose general contractor pays at 75 days while the supplier expects 30 are not what On-Screen Takeoff is typically brought in for.
- What can Billd do that On-Screen Takeoff cannot?
- Billd covers Material financing, Pay App Advance, Same-day supplier funding, Supplier network terms. On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Billd: Who pays Billd's fee, the contractor or the supplier?
The contractor. The supplier is paid upfront in full and carries no credit risk.
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
Billd: Does Billd publish rates?
No. Cost depends on term, product and underwriting outcome and is disclosed in the offer.
On-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
Billd: What happens if my general contractor pays late?
You still owe Billd on the agreed schedule. The 120 day term is designed to cover a normal pay cycle, not a dispute.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
Billd: Does using Billd affect bonding capacity?
It is a debt facility, so a surety will consider it. Discuss it with your bonding agent before drawing heavily.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
Related pages
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- Billd vs Briq
- Billd vs Procore
- Billd vs Sage 300 Construction
- Billd vs Siteline
- Billd vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Billd vs Document Crunch
- Billd vs Bridgit Bravo
- Billd vs GCPay
- Billd vs AutoCAD
- Billd vs Trimble Pay
- Billd vs Clearstory
- Billd vs Kojo
- Billd vs RIB CostX
- Billd vs Sitemark
- Billd vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Billd vs Togal.AI
- Billd vs Tekla Structures
- Billd vs Bluebeam Revu
- Billd vs Sage Estimating
- Billd vs Cubit Estimating
- Billd vs B2W Estimate
- Billd vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Billd vs Handoff
- Billd vs HCSS
- Billd vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Billd vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Billd vs Revit
- Billd vs Smartsheet
- Billd vs Vectorworks Architect
- Billd vs Viewpoint Vista
- Billd vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Briq
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Procore
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage 300 Construction
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Document Crunch
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bridgit Bravo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs GCPay
- On-Screen Takeoff vs AutoCAD
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Trimble Pay
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Clearstory
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Kojo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sitemark
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Skydio Dock for X10
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Tekla Structures
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Cubit Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
