Construction · head to head
Briq vs On-Screen Takeoff

Briq
Construction
Financial automation and forecasting for contractors sitting on top of construction ERP
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Briq briq layers on top of an ERP rather than replacing it, so the total finance software bill goes up and the business case has to come from headcount or close-time savings that are hard to measure in advance.; On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- They diverge on capability: Briq covers Invoice capture and coding, On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Briq and On-Screen Takeoff actually diverge.
| Attribute | Briq | On-Screen Takeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Briq
- Invoice capture and coding
- WIP schedules
- Cash flow forecasting
- Cost at completion forecasting
- Multi-entity consolidation
- Overhead allocation
- Workflow automation
- Dashboards and reporting
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Briq
- A contractor whose month-end close runs three weeks because WIP is rebuilt by hand in Excel every periodnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A group with four operating companies on different chart-of-accounts structures that needs one consolidated margin viewnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A specialty contractor processing thousands of supplier invoices a month that wants coding and approval automated rather than keyednot On-Screen Takeoff
- A finance director who needs a defensible cost-at-completion forecast for a surety or lender rather than a project manager's estimatenot On-Screen Takeoff
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot Briq
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot Briq
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot Briq
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot Briq
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Briq
- Briq layers on top of an ERP rather than replacing it, so the total finance software bill goes up and the business case has to come from headcount or close-time savings that are hard to measure in advance.
- The output is only as good as job cost coding in the underlying ledger, and contractors with inconsistent cost codes get faster visibility of a mess rather than a clean forecast.
- No pricing is published and the contract is scoped by entities, modules and transaction volume, which makes budgeting impossible without a full discovery exercise.
- Implementation is a data mapping project against systems such as Vista and Sage 300 that were not designed to be read this way, so go-live timelines run into months and depend on your own finance team's availability.
- It targets mid-market and larger contractors; a firm with one entity and a competent controller in Excel will not recover the cost, and the product is oversized for smaller subcontractors.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Briq
On request- Briq$undefined/year
- Annual platform subscription
- Scoped by modules, entities and transaction volume
- Implementation and data mapping quoted separately
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
Which should you pick?
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Questions people ask
- Is Briq or On-Screen Takeoff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Briq starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Briq or On-Screen Takeoff?
- Briq starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request.
- Does Briq or On-Screen Takeoff run on more platforms?
- Briq runs on Web. On-Screen Takeoff runs on Windows.
- What is Briq best used for?
- Briq is most often used for a contractor whose month-end close runs three weeks because wip is rebuilt by hand in excel every period, a group with four operating companies on different chart-of-accounts structures that needs one consolidated margin view, a specialty contractor processing thousands of supplier invoices a month that wants coding and approval automated rather than keyed, a finance director who needs a defensible cost-at-completion forecast for a surety or lender rather than a project manager's estimate. Of those, a contractor whose month-end close runs three weeks because wip is rebuilt by hand in excel every period and a group with four operating companies on different chart-of-accounts structures that needs one consolidated margin view are not what On-Screen Takeoff is typically brought in for.
- What can Briq do that On-Screen Takeoff cannot?
- Briq covers Invoice capture and coding, WIP schedules, Cash flow forecasting, Cost at completion forecasting. On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Briq: Does Briq replace my construction accounting system?
No. It reads from Vista, Sage or similar and automates the reporting and forecasting layer above them. You keep the ERP.
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
Briq: What does it cost?
Briq does not publish pricing. Contracts are scoped by module, entity count and transaction volume and quoted annually.
On-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
Briq: How long does implementation take?
Expect months rather than weeks, because most of the work is mapping and cleaning job cost data from the existing ledger.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
Briq: Is it useful for a single-entity contractor?
Less so. The strongest case is multi-entity consolidation and high invoice volume; a small contractor gets thinner returns.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
Related pages
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- Briq vs Billd
- Briq vs Viewpoint Vista
- Briq vs Procore
- Briq vs Siteline
- Briq vs Foundation Software
- Briq vs HCSS
- Briq vs Smartsheet
- Briq vs Adaptive
- Briq vs CMiC
- Briq vs Jonas Premier
- Briq vs Sage Estimating
- Briq vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Briq vs Vectorworks Architect
- Briq vs BricsCAD BIM
- Briq vs Buildertrend
- Briq vs BuildingConnected
- Briq vs Bluebeam Revu
- Briq vs RIB CostX
- Briq vs Cubit Estimating
- Briq vs Togal.AI
- Briq vs B2W Estimate
- Briq vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Briq vs Handoff
- Briq vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Briq vs Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Billd
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Procore
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Foundation Software
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Adaptive
- On-Screen Takeoff vs CMiC
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Jonas Premier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Buildertrend
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BuildingConnected
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Cubit Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit
