Technology · head to head
Checkmk vs Close

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Checkmk has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Checkmk pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average); Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Checkmk and Close actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Checkmk
Nothing recorded that Close does not also cover.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Checkmk
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Close
- System observabilitynot Close
- Enterprise compliance monitoringnot Close
Close
- Inside salesnot Checkmk
- Outbound salesnot Checkmk
- Lead managementnot Checkmk
- Sales engagementnot Checkmk
- Pipeline trackingnot Checkmk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Checkmk
- Pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average)
- Professional support limited to 8-10 hours per week on base plans
- Synthetic monitoring is separate add-on with per-test pricing
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Pricing, plan by plan
Checkmk
Free- Community (Self-Hosted)Free
- No cost, forever
- Up to ~100 hosts
- Basic infrastructure monitoring
- Pro (Self-Hosted)$190/month
- Advanced analytics
- Reporting
- Distributed monitoring
- Ultimate (Self-Hosted)$275/month
- Full-stack observability
- Advanced security compliance
- 10 hours x 5 days professional support (upgradable to 24/7)
- CloudAI (SaaS)$240/month
- Fully managed cloud hosting
- 99.5% uptime SLA
- Supports up to 50000 services
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Checkmk or Close better?
- Neither clearly leads. Checkmk starts at Free and Close at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Checkmk or Close?
- Checkmk has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Checkmk and $9/month for Close.
- Does Checkmk or Close run on more platforms?
- Checkmk runs on Web. Close runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Checkmk for free?
- Yes. Checkmk has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Checkmk best used for?
- Checkmk is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, system observability, enterprise compliance monitoring. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and system observability are not what Close is typically brought in for.
- What can Checkmk do that Close cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Checkmk: Is there a free version of Checkmk?
Yes, Checkmk Community edition is free forever and supports up to approximately 100 hosts for basic infrastructure monitoring with no cost.
SourceClose: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceCheckmk: How does Checkmk calculate pricing by host count?
Checkmk uses service-based pricing where each monitored aspect (file system, hardware sensor, switch port, metric) counts as one service. On average, there are approximately 30 services per host.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceCheckmk: What is the difference between Checkmk Pro and Ultimate tiers?
Pro tier at 190 EUR/month includes advanced analytics and 8x5 support, while Ultimate at 275 EUR/month adds full-stack observability, advanced compliance features, and upgradable 24/7 support.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceCheckmk: Does Checkmk offer a managed SaaS option?
Yes, Checkmk CloudAI is a fully managed SaaS tier at 240 EUR/month with 99.5% uptime SLA and support for up to 50000 services.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Checkmk vs Asana
- Checkmk vs ClickUp
- Checkmk vs Figma
- Checkmk vs Linear
- Checkmk vs Sentry
- Checkmk vs Nagios XI
- Checkmk vs Eclipse
- Checkmk vs Site24x7
- Checkmk vs Zabbix Cloud
- Checkmk vs Kubernetes
- Checkmk vs PostHog
- Checkmk vs Redis
- Checkmk vs Drift
- Checkmk vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Checkmk vs LogRocket
- Checkmk vs Neovim
- Checkmk vs UptimeRobot
- Checkmk vs Vercel
- Checkmk vs Attio
- Checkmk vs Docker
- Checkmk vs Mozilla Firefox
- Checkmk vs Userpilot
- Checkmk vs Personetics
- Checkmk vs Superhuman
- Checkmk vs Notion
- Checkmk vs Amplitude
- Checkmk vs Jenkins
- Checkmk vs Miro
- Checkmk vs Plane
- Checkmk vs Postman
- Checkmk vs Raycast
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Figma
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Sentry
- Close vs Nagios XI
- Close vs Eclipse
- Close vs Site24x7
- Close vs Zabbix Cloud
- Close vs Kubernetes
- Close vs PostHog
- Close vs Redis
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Close vs LogRocket
- Close vs Neovim
- Close vs UptimeRobot
- Close vs Vercel
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast

