Technology · head to head
Close vs CloudAMQP

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -

CloudAMQP
Technology
Managed RabbitMQ and LavinMQ clusters, hosted and fully managed
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CloudAMQP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); CloudAMQP free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and CloudAMQP actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in CloudAMQP
Nothing recorded that Close does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot CloudAMQP
- Outbound salesnot CloudAMQP
- Lead managementnot CloudAMQP
- Sales engagementnot CloudAMQP
- Pipeline trackingnot CloudAMQP
CloudAMQP
- Message queue servicesnot Close
- Message brokers for distributed systemsnot Close
- RabbitMQ and LavinMQ hostingnot Close
- Asynchronous task processingnot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
CloudAMQP
- Free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month
- Free tier connection limits are restrictive: 20-40
- Multi-tenant plans have queue limits (200-2,000 max)
- Dedicated plans expensive at scale: up to $14,995-$17,495/month
- Extra disk space add-on at $0.35/month per GB may add significant cost
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
CloudAMQP
Free- LavinMQ - Loyal Lemming (Free)Free
- 2 million messages per month
- 40 connection limit
- 200 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Little Lemur (Free)Free
- 1 million messages per month
- 20 connection limit
- 100 queue maximum
- LavinMQ - Elegant Ermine$19/month
- 20 million messages per month
- 200 connections
- 2,000 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Tough Tiger$19/month
- 10 million messages per month
- 100 connections
- 1,000 queue maximum
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or CloudAMQP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and CloudAMQP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or CloudAMQP?
- CloudAMQP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Close and Free for CloudAMQP.
- Does Close or CloudAMQP run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. CloudAMQP runs on Web.
- Can I use CloudAMQP for free?
- Yes. CloudAMQP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what CloudAMQP is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that CloudAMQP cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceCloudAMQP: Does CloudAMQP offer free plans?
Yes, CloudAMQP offers free tiers: LavinMQ Loyal Lemming with 2M messages/month, and RabbitMQ Little Lemur with 1M messages/month. Both include connection and queue limits.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceCloudAMQP: What is the cheapest paid plan?
Both LavinMQ Elegant Ermine and RabbitMQ Tough Tiger cost $19/month. LavinMQ includes 20M messages/month with 200 connections; RabbitMQ includes 10M messages/month with 100 connections.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceCloudAMQP: How are messages charged on CloudAMQP?
CloudAMQP plans include monthly message quotas. All plans are charged on a per-second basis with monthly billing cycles.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceCloudAMQP: What add-ons are available?
CloudAMQP offers Virtual Private Cloud add-on at $99/month, and extra disk space at $0.35/month per GB (25-2,000 GB available).
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs Figma
- Close vs Confluent Cloud
- Close vs MongoDB Atlas
- Close vs Zabbix Cloud
- Close vs Alkami
- Close vs Sentry
- Close vs Dropbox
- Close vs Checkmk
- Close vs Heap
- Close vs Microsoft Edge
- Close vs Netlify
- Close vs Productboard
- Close vs Trino
- CloudAMQP vs Attio
- CloudAMQP vs Drift
- CloudAMQP vs Asana
- CloudAMQP vs Docker
- CloudAMQP vs Mozilla Firefox
- CloudAMQP vs Userpilot
- CloudAMQP vs Personetics
- CloudAMQP vs Superhuman
- CloudAMQP vs ClickUp
- CloudAMQP vs Linear
- CloudAMQP vs Notion
- CloudAMQP vs Amplitude
- CloudAMQP vs Jenkins
- CloudAMQP vs Miro
- CloudAMQP vs Plane
- CloudAMQP vs Postman
- CloudAMQP vs Raycast
- CloudAMQP vs Figma
- CloudAMQP vs Confluent Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs MongoDB Atlas
- CloudAMQP vs Zabbix Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs Alkami
- CloudAMQP vs Sentry
- CloudAMQP vs Dropbox
- CloudAMQP vs Checkmk
- CloudAMQP vs Heap
- CloudAMQP vs Microsoft Edge
- CloudAMQP vs Netlify
- CloudAMQP vs Productboard
- CloudAMQP vs Trino
