Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs Vigilant Solutions

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Vigilant Solutions
Government
License Plate Recognition Analytics
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; Vigilant Solutions vigilant Solutions' product line, as captured before its Motorola Solutions acquisition (Internet Archive capture, 8 January 2020), was named Vigilant PlateSearch, FaceSearch, BallisticSearch and CrimeSearch, sold to law enforcement with no published pricing
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Vigilant Solutions covers License Plate Recognition.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and Vigilant Solutions actually diverge.
| Attribute | OWASP ZAP | Vigilant Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | free | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli, Api | Web, Desktop, Mobile |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 2001 | 1928 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in Vigilant Solutions
- License Plate Recognition
- Vehicle Database
- Real-time Alerts
- Analytics
- Mobile LPR
- CAD Systems
- RMS
- Federal Databases
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Vigilant Solutions
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Vigilant Solutions
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Vigilant Solutions
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Vigilant Solutions
Vigilant Solutions
- Citizen Servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Records Managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Public Safetynot OWASP ZAP
- Civic Engagementnot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Vigilant Solutions
- Vigilant Solutions' product line, as captured before its Motorola Solutions acquisition (Internet Archive capture, 8 January 2020), was named Vigilant PlateSearch, FaceSearch, BallisticSearch and CrimeSearch, sold to law enforcement with no published pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Vigilant Solutions
$1000/month- LPR Analytics$1000/month
- LPR Cameras
- Database Access
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose Vigilant Solutions if
- You need license plate recognition.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want vehicle database.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or Vigilant Solutions better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and Vigilant Solutions at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or Vigilant Solutions?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and $1000/month for Vigilant Solutions.
- Does OWASP ZAP or Vigilant Solutions run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. Vigilant Solutions runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Vigilant Solutions starts at $1000/month.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what Vigilant Solutions is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that Vigilant Solutions cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. Vigilant Solutions covers License Plate Recognition, Vehicle Database, Real-time Alerts, Analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Vigilant Solutions: How do I get pricing information for Vigilant Solutions?
Vigilant Solutions does not publish pricing on their website. Customers must contact Motorola Solutions' sales team directly to request a pricing estimate or discuss their specific requirements.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Vigilant Solutions: Is there a free demo or trial available?
Yes, Motorola Solutions (which now owns Vigilant Solutions) offers a free customized demo conducted by security experts. Users can request a demo on the product page without obligation.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Vigilant Solutions: Can I get a pricing estimate without committing?
Yes, customers can provide details about their requirements through the website to receive a no-obligation pricing estimate from Motorola Solutions. This allows evaluation of potential costs before making any commitment.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on Vigilant Solutions
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs Accela
- OWASP ZAP vs Granicus
- OWASP ZAP vs DocuWare
- OWASP ZAP vs SafeCity
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Brazos
- OWASP ZAP vs Mark43
- OWASP ZAP vs ShotSpotter
- OWASP ZAP vs Axon Records
- OWASP ZAP vs IAPro
- OWASP ZAP vs Ring Neighbors
- OWASP ZAP vs CitizenLab
- OWASP ZAP vs ClearGov
- OWASP ZAP vs DemandStar
- OWASP ZAP vs eCode360
- OWASP ZAP vs MyRec.com
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- Vigilant Solutions vs 1Password
- Vigilant Solutions vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Vigilant Solutions vs Norton 360
- Vigilant Solutions vs LastPass
- Vigilant Solutions vs Bitwarden
- Vigilant Solutions vs Burp Suite
- Vigilant Solutions vs Metasploit
- Vigilant Solutions vs Wireshark
- Vigilant Solutions vs authentik
- Vigilant Solutions vs Authelia
- Vigilant Solutions vs Infisical
- Vigilant Solutions vs Trivy
- Vigilant Solutions vs Feedzai
- Vigilant Solutions vs Frontegg
- Vigilant Solutions vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Vigilant Solutions vs JumpCloud
- Vigilant Solutions vs McAfee Total Protection
- Vigilant Solutions vs CivicPlus
- Vigilant Solutions vs Accela
- Vigilant Solutions vs Granicus
- Vigilant Solutions vs DocuWare
- Vigilant Solutions vs SafeCity
- Vigilant Solutions vs Tyler Brazos
- Vigilant Solutions vs Mark43
- Vigilant Solutions vs ShotSpotter
- Vigilant Solutions vs Axon Records
- Vigilant Solutions vs IAPro
- Vigilant Solutions vs Ring Neighbors
- Vigilant Solutions vs CitizenLab
- Vigilant Solutions vs ClearGov
- Vigilant Solutions vs DemandStar
- Vigilant Solutions vs eCode360
- Vigilant Solutions vs MyRec.com
- Vigilant Solutions vs Tyler Technologies
