Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs SAP for Government

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

SAP for Government
Government
Intelligent Enterprise for Public Sector
- From
- $8000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; SAP for Government sAP's own G-Cloud 14 SuccessFactors pricing document lists Employee Central at £59.76 per user per year for the public sector, with Recruiting and Onboarding modules charged per transaction at £142.00 and £72.00 respectively
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, SAP for Government covers Financial Management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and SAP for Government actually diverge.
| Attribute | OWASP ZAP | SAP for Government |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $8000/month |
| Pricing model | free | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli, Api | Web, Desktop, Mobile |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 2001 | 1972 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in SAP for Government
- Financial Management
- Procurement
- Human Resources
- Analytics
- Grants Management
- Microsoft
- Oracle
- Third-party Systems
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot SAP for Government
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot SAP for Government
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot SAP for Government
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot SAP for Government
SAP for Government
- Citizen Servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Records Managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Public Safetynot OWASP ZAP
- Civic Engagementnot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
SAP for Government
- SAP's own G-Cloud 14 SuccessFactors pricing document lists Employee Central at £59.76 per user per year for the public sector, with Recruiting and Onboarding modules charged per transaction at £142.00 and £72.00 respectively
- RISE with SAP is listed on G-Cloud 14 as a subscription requiring a minimum three year contract term, per SAP's own pricing document
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
SAP for Government
$8000/month- Government Cloud$8000/month
- ERP
- Financial Management
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose SAP for Government if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want procurement.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or SAP for Government better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and SAP for Government at $8000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or SAP for Government?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and $8000/month for SAP for Government.
- Does OWASP ZAP or SAP for Government run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. SAP for Government runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SAP for Government starts at $8000/month.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what SAP for Government is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that SAP for Government cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. SAP for Government covers Financial Management, Procurement, Human Resources, Analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
OWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
OWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on SAP for Government
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Accela
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs Granicus
- OWASP ZAP vs DocuWare
- OWASP ZAP vs Workday Government
- OWASP ZAP vs OpenGov
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- OWASP ZAP vs Euna Solutions
- OWASP ZAP vs Bonfire
- OWASP ZAP vs Oracle Government Cloud
- OWASP ZAP vs Periscope Holdings
- OWASP ZAP vs IAPro
- OWASP ZAP vs iCompass
- OWASP ZAP vs Mapbox Government
- OWASP ZAP vs Mark43
- OWASP ZAP vs MuckRock
- OWASP ZAP vs GovQA
- OWASP ZAP vs Incode
- SAP for Government vs 1Password
- SAP for Government vs Bitdefender Total Security
- SAP for Government vs Norton 360
- SAP for Government vs LastPass
- SAP for Government vs Bitwarden
- SAP for Government vs Burp Suite
- SAP for Government vs Metasploit
- SAP for Government vs Wireshark
- SAP for Government vs authentik
- SAP for Government vs Authelia
- SAP for Government vs Infisical
- SAP for Government vs Trivy
- SAP for Government vs Feedzai
- SAP for Government vs Frontegg
- SAP for Government vs HashiCorp Boundary
- SAP for Government vs JumpCloud
- SAP for Government vs McAfee Total Protection
- SAP for Government vs Accela
- SAP for Government vs CivicPlus
- SAP for Government vs Granicus
- SAP for Government vs DocuWare
- SAP for Government vs Workday Government
- SAP for Government vs OpenGov
- SAP for Government vs Tyler Technologies
- SAP for Government vs Euna Solutions
- SAP for Government vs Bonfire
- SAP for Government vs Oracle Government Cloud
- SAP for Government vs Periscope Holdings
- SAP for Government vs IAPro
- SAP for Government vs iCompass
- SAP for Government vs Mapbox Government
- SAP for Government vs Mark43
- SAP for Government vs MuckRock
- SAP for Government vs GovQA
- SAP for Government vs Incode
