Softwr

Accounting · head to head

Carta vs Yooz

Carta logo

Carta

Accounting

Cap table, equity and 409A valuation software built around United States private company practice

From
$29/month
Rated
-
Yooz logo

Yooz

Accounting

AP automation for mid-sized finance teams, with unlimited users included in the subscription

From
$199/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Carta pricing scales with the number of stakeholders on the cap table, so a company that grants options broadly pays a rising annual fee for employees and small angels who sign in once a year, and the cost keeps climbing after the round that justified it is spent.; Yooz it is accounts payable only, with no requisitioning, sourcing or contract management, so procurement control has to come from somewhere else.
  • They diverge on capability: Carta covers Cap table of record, Yooz covers Invoice capture.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Carta and Yooz actually diverge.

Attributes where Carta and Yooz differ
AttributeCartaYooz
Starting price$29/month$199/month
Pricing modelsubscriptionPer month by invoice volume
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Carta

  • Cap table of record
  • 409A valuations
  • Electronic issuance
  • Vesting and exercise
  • Employee portal
  • Scenario modelling
  • Waterfall analysis
  • ASC 718 expense reporting

Only in Yooz

  • Invoice capture
  • Automatic coding
  • Purchase order matching
  • Approval workflow
  • Fraud and duplicate detection
  • Payment initiation
  • Unlimited users
  • E-invoicing readiness

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Carta

  • A startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read itnot Yooz
  • A company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409A before it can set a strike pricenot Yooz
  • A finance team preparing its first audit and needing ASC 718 stock compensation schedules that tie to the grant recordsnot Yooz
  • A venture fund that wants LP reporting, capital calls and SPV administration handled outside a spreadsheetnot Yooz

Yooz

  • A finance team with thirty occasional approvers that cannot justify per-seat AP automationnot Carta
  • An accounting practice processing invoices on behalf of many client companiesnot Carta
  • A French or European business preparing for mandatory electronic invoicing without buying an enterprise platformnot Carta
  • A company losing early payment discounts because paper invoices sit in someone's tray for two weeksnot Carta

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Carta

  • Pricing scales with the number of stakeholders on the cap table, so a company that grants options broadly pays a rising annual fee for employees and small angels who sign in once a year, and the cost keeps climbing after the round that justified it is spent.
  • The cap table is a legal record assembled from years of board consents, so migrating to another provider means re-entering historical transactions and having counsel confirm the rebuilt table matches the signed documents, which is why most companies stay whatever they think of the service.
  • The product is built around United States company law and tax practice, Delaware entities, 409A and ASC 718, so a company incorporated in the United Kingdom, Europe or elsewhere gets a record keeping tool while the valuation and compliance features that carry the price are of limited or no use.
  • 409A valuations are delivered on a cadence and require a refresh after each material event or every twelve months, so a company that raises or changes materially is repeatedly back in a valuation process with fees and turnaround time attached, and a late valuation blocks option issuance.
  • Carta drew sustained criticism in 2024 over how customer cap table data intersected with its secondary trading business, and although it exited that activity the episode is a live reason to check what a vendor holding your ownership record is permitted to do with it.

Yooz

  • It is accounts payable only, with no requisitioning, sourcing or contract management, so procurement control has to come from somewhere else.
  • Pricing is published only as a starting point and the real number depends on invoice volume and connector requirements, so the advertised figure understates what most buyers pay.
  • Country compliance depth is strongest in France and francophone Europe; buyers needing many national e-invoicing mandates at once are better served by a vendor built for that.
  • Extraction accuracy on unusual supplier layouts still requires human correction, and the learning improves only with volume, so small-volume users see less benefit from the automation they are paying for.
  • ERP connectors vary in depth between accounting systems, and a shallow connector turns the promised straight-through posting into a periodic file export that someone has to run.

Pricing, plan by plan

Carta

$29/month
  • LaunchFree
    • Cap table
    • Stakeholder management
  • Seed$360/year
    • 409A valuations
    • Option exercising
    • Scenarios

Yooz

$199/month
  • Entry$199/month
    • Unlimited users
    • Invoice capture, coding and approval workflow
    • Volume allowance applies
  • Volume tiers$undefined/month
    • Priced by monthly invoice volume
    • European mid-market typically €300 to €600 a month at 200 to 500 invoices
    • Purchase order matching and fraud detection

Which should you pick?

Choose Carta if

  • You need cap table of record.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want 409a valuations.

Choose Yooz if

  • You need invoice capture.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want automatic coding.

Questions people ask

Is Carta or Yooz better?
Neither clearly leads. Carta starts at $29/month and Yooz at $199/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Carta or Yooz?
Carta starts at $29/month and Yooz at $199/month.
Does Carta or Yooz run on more platforms?
Carta runs on Web, Ios, Android. Yooz runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Carta best used for?
Carta is most often used for a startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read it, a company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409a before it can set a strike price, a finance team preparing its first audit and needing asc 718 stock compensation schedules that tie to the grant records, a venture fund that wants lp reporting, capital calls and spv administration handled outside a spreadsheet. Of those, a startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read it and a company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409a before it can set a strike price are not what Yooz is typically brought in for.
What can Carta do that Yooz cannot?
Carta covers Cap table of record, 409A valuations, Electronic issuance, Vesting and exercise. Yooz covers Invoice capture, Automatic coding, Purchase order matching, Approval workflow.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Carta: Do I need Carta before I have employees with options?

No. Before options exist a spreadsheet reviewed by your lawyer is usually enough. The pressure to move normally comes at a priced round, or the first time you need a 409A to set a strike price.

Yooz: How is it priced?

On monthly invoice volume, with unlimited users included. Entry pricing is around $199 a month, and European mid-market deployments commonly land at €300 to €600.

Carta: Is the 409A included in the subscription?

The subscription tiers bundle valuations differently and refreshes after material events can carry additional cost. Check what triggers a chargeable revaluation before you sign, because raising a round is exactly the moment you will need one.

Yooz: Are there per-user charges?

No, and that is its main commercial advantage over competitors that meter approvers.

Carta: Can my accountant get the stock compensation numbers out of it?

Yes, it produces ASC 718 expense schedules and exports. If your accounts are prepared under a different framework, expect the schedules to be a starting point that your accountant reworks rather than something they post directly.

Yooz: Does it do procurement as well?

No. It automates accounts payable. Requisitions, sourcing and contracts need a separate system.

Carta: Is it useful for a company outside the United States?

It can hold the share register and grants, and it does support some non United States structures. The 409A and United States tax workflow will not apply to you, so weigh it against local alternatives that understand your filings.

Yooz: Is it ready for European e-invoicing mandates?

Yes for France and francophone Europe in particular. For a wide multi-country mandate footprint, compare against a vendor built for that specific problem.

Carta: How hard is it to leave?

Harder than the export button suggests. You can export the data, but the receiving system has to reproduce every historical grant, cancellation and transfer, and someone has to verify the result against the original signed consents.

Carta: Who normally pays for it, the company or the investors?

The company, even though investors and counsel are frequent users. That is the usual complaint about the pricing model: the party paying is not the only party benefiting.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads