Accounting · head to head
Carta vs DATEV

Carta
Accounting
Cap table, equity and 409A valuation software built around United States private company practice
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

DATEV
Accounting
German accounting, payroll and tax software built around the tax adviser rather than the business
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Carta pricing scales with the number of stakeholders on the cap table, so a company that grants options broadly pays a rising annual fee for employees and small angels who sign in once a year, and the cost keeps climbing after the round that justified it is spent.; DATEV dATEV does not publish transparent per-customer pricing the way a SaaS vendor does; your real cost is buried in your tax adviser's fee note, so comparing it against Lexware or sevdesk on price is genuinely hard.
- They diverge on capability: Carta covers Cap table of record, DATEV covers Unternehmen online.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Carta and DATEV actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Carta
- Cap table of record
- 409A valuations
- Electronic issuance
- Vesting and exercise
- Employee portal
- Scenario modelling
- Waterfall analysis
- ASC 718 expense reporting
Only in DATEV
- Unternehmen online
- Lohn und Gehalt
- Rechnungswesen
- Jahresabschluss
- DATEV DMS
- Meine Steuern
- DATEV-Schnittstelle
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Carta
- A startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read itnot DATEV
- A company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409A before it can set a strike pricenot DATEV
- A finance team preparing its first audit and needing ASC 718 stock compensation schedules that tie to the grant recordsnot DATEV
- A venture fund that wants LP reporting, capital calls and SPV administration handled outside a spreadsheetnot DATEV
DATEV
- A German GmbH that wants its Steuerberater to keep doing the books but wants receipts to stop travelling in a shoeboxnot Carta
- A payroll department that must file social insurance and wage tax returns to German statutory deadlines without an external bureaunot Carta
- An SME preparing an e-Bilanz and audit-ready GoBD document archivenot Carta
- A tax firm standardising dozens of client engagements on one chart of accounts and one document workflownot Carta
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Carta
- Pricing scales with the number of stakeholders on the cap table, so a company that grants options broadly pays a rising annual fee for employees and small angels who sign in once a year, and the cost keeps climbing after the round that justified it is spent.
- The cap table is a legal record assembled from years of board consents, so migrating to another provider means re-entering historical transactions and having counsel confirm the rebuilt table matches the signed documents, which is why most companies stay whatever they think of the service.
- The product is built around United States company law and tax practice, Delaware entities, 409A and ASC 718, so a company incorporated in the United Kingdom, Europe or elsewhere gets a record keeping tool while the valuation and compliance features that carry the price are of limited or no use.
- 409A valuations are delivered on a cadence and require a refresh after each material event or every twelve months, so a company that raises or changes materially is repeatedly back in a valuation process with fees and turnaround time attached, and a late valuation blocks option issuance.
- Carta drew sustained criticism in 2024 over how customer cap table data intersected with its secondary trading business, and although it exited that activity the episode is a live reason to check what a vendor holding your ownership record is permitted to do with it.
DATEV
- DATEV does not publish transparent per-customer pricing the way a SaaS vendor does; your real cost is buried in your tax adviser's fee note, so comparing it against Lexware or sevdesk on price is genuinely hard.
- The board has decided to wind down the Austria-specific portfolio: existing products remain usable to 31 December 2028, are free of charge during 2029, and cannot be used after 31 December 2029, so any Austrian entity on DATEV has a forced migration dated in advance.
- It is built for German statutory practice, so a group with subsidiaries outside the DACH region will run DATEV for Germany and something else everywhere else, with a consolidation step in between.
- Large parts of the suite are still Windows desktop software installed on a workstation or terminal server, which means IT overhead most companies no longer budget for when they think they are buying cloud accounting.
- The lock-in is social as well as technical: because your adviser holds the installation and the history, changing accounting software usually forces you to change or retrain your adviser, which is a far bigger decision than a software migration.
Pricing, plan by plan
Carta
$29/month- LaunchFree
- Cap table
- Stakeholder management
- Seed$360/year
- 409A valuations
- Option exercising
- Scenarios
DATEV
On request- DATEV Unternehmen online$undefined/month
- Receipt and bank data exchange with your tax adviser
- Cash book and master data modules
- Ordered and usually rebilled through the adviser
- DATEV Mittelstand$undefined/month
- In-house financial accounting and invoicing
- Payroll modules licensed separately
- Per-workplace licensing
- Lohn und Gehalt$undefined/month
- German payroll runs and statutory electronic filings
- Priced by number of payslips
- Typically operated by the adviser on the client's behalf
Which should you pick?
Choose Carta if
- You need cap table of record.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want 409a valuations.
Choose DATEV if
- You need unternehmen online.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want lohn und gehalt.
Questions people ask
- Is Carta or DATEV better?
- Neither clearly leads. Carta starts at $29/month and DATEV at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Carta or DATEV?
- Carta starts at $29/month and DATEV at On request.
- Does Carta or DATEV run on more platforms?
- Carta runs on Web, Ios, Android. DATEV runs on Windows, Web.
- What is Carta best used for?
- Carta is most often used for a startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read it, a company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409a before it can set a strike price, a finance team preparing its first audit and needing asc 718 stock compensation schedules that tie to the grant records, a venture fund that wants lp reporting, capital calls and spv administration handled outside a spreadsheet. Of those, a startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read it and a company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409a before it can set a strike price are not what DATEV is typically brought in for.
- What can Carta do that DATEV cannot?
- Carta covers Cap table of record, 409A valuations, Electronic issuance, Vesting and exercise. DATEV covers Unternehmen online, Lohn und Gehalt, Rechnungswesen, Jahresabschluss.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Carta: Do I need Carta before I have employees with options?
No. Before options exist a spreadsheet reviewed by your lawyer is usually enough. The pressure to move normally comes at a priced round, or the first time you need a 409A to set a strike price.
DATEV: Can I buy DATEV directly without a tax adviser?
In practice, no for most of the range. Membership of the cooperative is restricted to the tax and legal professions, and companies get access through their adviser or as a client of one.
Carta: Is the 409A included in the subscription?
The subscription tiers bundle valuations differently and refreshes after material events can carry additional cost. Check what triggers a chargeable revaluation before you sign, because raising a round is exactly the moment you will need one.
DATEV: Is DATEV usable outside Germany?
It operates in Austria, Italy, Spain, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary, but the depth is German. The Austrian product line is being discontinued with a hard end date of 31 December 2029.
Carta: Can my accountant get the stock compensation numbers out of it?
Yes, it produces ASC 718 expense schedules and exports. If your accounts are prepared under a different framework, expect the schedules to be a starting point that your accountant reworks rather than something they post directly.
DATEV: What is the DATEV-Schnittstelle everyone mentions?
It is the standard export format German invoicing and ERP tools produce so bookkeeping data can be handed to a DATEV-based adviser. Supporting it is effectively a requirement to sell accounting-adjacent software in Germany.
Carta: Is it useful for a company outside the United States?
It can hold the share register and grants, and it does support some non United States structures. The 409A and United States tax workflow will not apply to you, so weigh it against local alternatives that understand your filings.
DATEV: Does DATEV handle e-invoicing under the German B2B mandate?
Yes, the accounting and invoicing modules were extended for the XRechnung and ZUGFeRD formats that the German B2B e-invoicing rules require.
Carta: How hard is it to leave?
Harder than the export button suggests. You can export the data, but the receiving system has to reproduce every historical grant, cancellation and transfer, and someone has to verify the result against the original signed consents.
Carta: Who normally pays for it, the company or the investors?
The company, even though investors and counsel are frequent users. That is the usual complaint about the pricing model: the party paying is not the only party benefiting.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Carta vs Airbase
- Carta vs Ramp
- Carta vs QuickBooks
- Carta vs Melio
- Carta vs Brex
- Carta vs Mercury
- Carta vs Spendbase
- Carta vs Sage 50
- Carta vs Soldo
- Carta vs Yooz
- Carta vs Happay
- Carta vs Vena Solutions
- Carta vs ADP
- Carta vs Avalara
- Carta vs BlackLine
- Carta vs Chargebee
- Carta vs Cledara
- Carta vs Lexware
- Carta vs sevdesk
- Carta vs Paychex
- Carta vs Bill.com
- Carta vs FloQast
- Carta vs Xero
- Carta vs Zoho Books
- Carta vs Money Forward Cloud
- Carta vs RazorpayX
- Carta vs Conta Azul
- Carta vs Creem
- Carta vs Dinero
- Carta vs Divvy
- Carta vs Dodo Payments
- Carta vs Empower
- DATEV vs Airbase
- DATEV vs Ramp
- DATEV vs QuickBooks
- DATEV vs Melio
- DATEV vs Brex
- DATEV vs Mercury
- DATEV vs Spendbase
- DATEV vs Sage 50
- DATEV vs Soldo
- DATEV vs Yooz
- DATEV vs Happay
- DATEV vs Vena Solutions
- DATEV vs ADP
- DATEV vs Avalara
- DATEV vs BlackLine
- DATEV vs Chargebee
- DATEV vs Cledara
- DATEV vs Lexware
- DATEV vs sevdesk
- DATEV vs Paychex
- DATEV vs Bill.com
- DATEV vs FloQast
- DATEV vs Xero
- DATEV vs Zoho Books
- DATEV vs Money Forward Cloud
- DATEV vs RazorpayX
- DATEV vs Conta Azul
- DATEV vs Creem
- DATEV vs Dinero
- DATEV vs Divvy
- DATEV vs Dodo Payments
- DATEV vs Empower
