Manufacturing · head to head
Aras Innovator vs Authentise

Aras Innovator
Manufacturing
Subscription PLM platform where every module is included in the seat price
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Authentise
Manufacturing
Modular MES and workflow automation for additive manufacturing, with ITAR-capable deployment options
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Aras Innovator has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aras Innovator aras publishes no prices at all, so you cannot sanity-check a quote against a list price and every negotiation starts from the vendor knowing more than you do.; Authentise nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.
- They diverge on capability: Aras Innovator covers Model-based configuration, Authentise covers Additive workflow automation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aras Innovator and Authentise actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aras Innovator | Authentise |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Cloud, Self-hosted | Web, API |
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aras Innovator
- Model-based configuration
- Upgrades included
- All applications in one subscription
- CAD data management
- Effectivity and configuration management
- Community Edition
- Open REST and OData APIs
Only in Authentise
- Additive workflow automation
- Machine data capture
- Traceability
- Modular deployment
- ITAR-capable hosting
- Scheduling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aras Innovator
- A manufacturer whose current PLM cannot be upgraded because past customisations would break, and who wants configuration that survives releasesnot Authentise
- An engineering organisation that needs requirements, quality and change management under one data model without buying three modulesnot Authentise
- A medical device or aerospace firm needing full traceability from requirement to as-built serial numbernot Authentise
- A company piloting PLM on a real programme using the free 50-user Community Edition before committing budgetnot Authentise
Authentise
- An additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendorsnot Aras Innovator
- An aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidencenot Aras Innovator
- A defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under ITAR-compliant hostingnot Aras Innovator
- A corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sitesnot Aras Innovator
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aras Innovator
- Aras publishes no prices at all, so you cannot sanity-check a quote against a list price and every negotiation starts from the vendor knowing more than you do.
- The platform ships as a toolkit rather than a configured process, so a first implementation is typically a six to twelve month engagement with an integrator, and services frequently cost more than the first two years of subscription.
- The Community Edition is capped at 50 named users, gets only annual releases and excludes Aras-performed upgrades, so it is a genuine free tier but a deliberately awkward place to stay.
- Configuration flexibility invites over-customisation; organisations that model every local exception end up with a system only two internal people understand, which is the same trap they left their previous PLM to escape.
- CAD connectors are not all equal in maturity, and some are excluded from the base subscription, so a shop standardised on a less common CAD tool should confirm connector scope in writing before signing.
Authentise
- Nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.
- It is additive-specific, so a shop with significant machining, casting or fabrication work still needs a second MES and an integration between them.
- The ITAR-capable deployment that justifies the price is irrelevant to purely commercial shops, which then find the system expensive relative to general manufacturing software.
- Integrating with the ERP and PLM systems that already hold part and order data is project work, and the burden falls on a small vendor rather than a large systems integrator ecosystem.
- Company scale is modest against the industrial software incumbents, which is a real consideration for a system sitting in the traceability path of qualified aerospace parts.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aras Innovator
Free- Community EditionFree
- Up to 50 named users
- Core product data platform
- Yearly release cadence only
- Subscription (Standard, self-hosted)$undefined/year
- Named-user subscription
- All applications included
- Quarterly releases
- Subscription (SaaS)$undefined/year
- Aras-hosted and operated
- All applications included
- Quarterly releases
Authentise
On request- Authentise Flows and MES modules$undefined/year
- Modular licensing by function
- Public cloud, private SaaS or ITAR-compliant deployment
- Machine data capture and traceability
Which should you pick?
Choose Aras Innovator if
- You need model-based configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want upgrades included.
Choose Authentise if
- You need additive workflow automation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want machine data capture.
Questions people ask
- Is Aras Innovator or Authentise better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aras Innovator starts at Free and Authentise at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aras Innovator or Authentise?
- Aras Innovator has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aras Innovator and On request for Authentise.
- Does Aras Innovator or Authentise run on more platforms?
- Aras Innovator runs on Web, Windows, Cloud, Self-hosted. Authentise runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Aras Innovator for free?
- Yes. Aras Innovator has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Authentise starts at On request.
- What is Aras Innovator best used for?
- Aras Innovator is most often used for a manufacturer whose current plm cannot be upgraded because past customisations would break, and who wants configuration that survives releases, an engineering organisation that needs requirements, quality and change management under one data model without buying three modules, a medical device or aerospace firm needing full traceability from requirement to as-built serial number, a company piloting plm on a real programme using the free 50-user community edition before committing budget. Of those, a manufacturer whose current plm cannot be upgraded because past customisations would break, and who wants configuration that survives releases and an engineering organisation that needs requirements, quality and change management under one data model without buying three modules are not what Authentise is typically brought in for.
- What can Aras Innovator do that Authentise cannot?
- Aras Innovator covers Model-based configuration, Upgrades included, All applications in one subscription, CAD data management. Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Machine data capture, Traceability, Modular deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aras Innovator: Is Aras Innovator open source?
No. The source is not open. The Community Edition is free of licence fee for up to 50 named users under a revocable licence, which is not the same thing.
Authentise: How is Authentise priced?
It is not published. Licensing is modular and quoted annually, with integration and onboarding priced separately.
Aras Innovator: Can I buy a perpetual licence?
No. Aras sells subscription only. If a perpetual PLM licence is a procurement requirement, Aras is out.
Authentise: Can it handle ITAR-controlled work?
Yes. It offers ITAR-compliant deployment alongside public cloud and private SaaS, which is a primary reason defence suppliers choose it.
Aras Innovator: Do upgrades cost extra?
No, and that is the central commercial claim. Aras performs upgrades of subscriber environments, including customised ones, as part of the subscription.
Authentise: Does it work with printers from more than one manufacturer?
Yes. It is designed for mixed fleets and captures machine data across vendors, which single-vendor software will not do.
Aras Innovator: How many modules do I have to buy?
One subscription covers all applications. Some CAD connectors are the exception, so confirm yours is in scope.
Authentise: Is it a full MES for a general machine shop?
No. It is built around additive workflows; subtractive-heavy shops need a general MES as well.
Related pages
More on Aras Innovator
Other head to heads
- Aras Innovator vs PTC Windchill
- Aras Innovator vs Duro PLM
- Aras Innovator vs OpenBOM
- Aras Innovator vs SolidWorks
- Aras Innovator vs Propel
- Aras Innovator vs Materialise Magics
- Aras Innovator vs AVEVA System Platform
- Aras Innovator vs Ignition
- Aras Innovator vs Litmus Edge
- Aras Innovator vs Maintenance Connection
- Aras Innovator vs Seeq
- Aras Innovator vs Oden Technologies
- Aras Innovator vs Oqton
- Aras Innovator vs Paperless Parts
- Aras Innovator vs Petasense
- Aras Innovator vs Poseidon Systems
- Aras Innovator vs Arena PLM
- Aras Innovator vs Fulcrum
- Aras Innovator vs Tulip
- Aras Innovator vs MachineMetrics
- Aras Innovator vs 3YOURMIND
- Aras Innovator vs Prodsmart
- Aras Innovator vs TrakSYS
- Aras Innovator vs AMFG
- Aras Innovator vs Flow Software
- Aras Innovator vs ProShop ERP
- Aras Innovator vs QAD Redzone
- Aras Innovator vs Sensemore
- Aras Innovator vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Aras Innovator vs Simplify3D
- Aras Innovator vs TrendMiner
- Authentise vs PTC Windchill
- Authentise vs Duro PLM
- Authentise vs OpenBOM
- Authentise vs SolidWorks
- Authentise vs Propel
- Authentise vs Materialise Magics
- Authentise vs AVEVA System Platform
- Authentise vs Ignition
- Authentise vs Litmus Edge
- Authentise vs Maintenance Connection
- Authentise vs Seeq
- Authentise vs Oden Technologies
- Authentise vs Oqton
- Authentise vs Paperless Parts
- Authentise vs Petasense
- Authentise vs Poseidon Systems
- Authentise vs Arena PLM
- Authentise vs Fulcrum
- Authentise vs Tulip
- Authentise vs MachineMetrics
- Authentise vs 3YOURMIND
- Authentise vs Prodsmart
- Authentise vs TrakSYS
- Authentise vs AMFG
- Authentise vs Flow Software
- Authentise vs ProShop ERP
- Authentise vs QAD Redzone
- Authentise vs Sensemore
- Authentise vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Authentise vs Simplify3D
- Authentise vs TrendMiner
