Manufacturing · head to head
Authentise vs Oqton

Authentise
Manufacturing
Modular MES and workflow automation for additive manufacturing, with ITAR-capable deployment options
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Oqton
Manufacturing
3D Systems manufacturing operating system for additive, narrowed after Geomagic was sold to Hexagon
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authentise nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.; Oqton 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- They diverge on capability: Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Oqton covers Manufacturing OS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authentise and Oqton actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authentise | Oqton |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, Windows, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authentise
- Additive workflow automation
- Machine data capture
- Modular deployment
- ITAR-capable hosting
- Scheduling
Only in Oqton
- Manufacturing OS
- Build preparation
- Machine connectivity
- Automated nesting
- Quality data
Both cover
- Traceability
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authentise
- An additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendorsnot Oqton
- An aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidencenot Oqton
- A defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under ITAR-compliant hostingnot Oqton
- A corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sitesnot Oqton
Oqton
- A metal additive production site scheduling builds across several machines rather than per operatornot Authentise
- A dental manufacturer needing batch to part traceability for regulated devicesnot Authentise
- A 3D Systems printer customer moving from prototyping to serial productionnot Authentise
- A factory automating build nesting to raise platform utilisationnot Authentise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authentise
- Nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.
- It is additive-specific, so a shop with significant machining, casting or fabrication work still needs a second MES and an integration between them.
- The ITAR-capable deployment that justifies the price is irrelevant to purely commercial shops, which then find the system expensive relative to general manufacturing software.
- Integrating with the ERP and PLM systems that already hold part and order data is project work, and the burden falls on a small vendor rather than a large systems integrator ecosystem.
- Company scale is modest against the industrial software incumbents, which is a real consideration for a system sitting in the traceability path of qualified aerospace parts.
Oqton
- 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- No pricing is published, and licensing is split between the manufacturing OS and separately licensed build preparation modules, so the quoted figure is rarely the full cost.
- Support is deepest on 3D Systems hardware despite multi-vendor claims, so a mixed fleet gets uneven data capture and control.
- The parent company has been under financial pressure and has already divested a major software line, which is a genuine continuity risk for a system running a production floor.
- It is additive-only, so a manufacturer with mixed processes needs a conventional MES alongside it and an integration between the two.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authentise
On request- Authentise Flows and MES modules$undefined/year
- Modular licensing by function
- Public cloud, private SaaS or ITAR-compliant deployment
- Machine data capture and traceability
Oqton
On request- Oqton Industrial Manufacturing OS$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by 3D Systems
- Priced on connected machines and sites
- Build preparation modules licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Authentise if
- You need additive workflow automation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want machine data capture.
Choose Oqton if
- You need manufacturing os.
- You work on Web, Windows, API.
- You also want build preparation.
Questions people ask
- Is Authentise or Oqton better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authentise starts at On request and Oqton at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authentise or Oqton?
- Authentise starts at On request and Oqton at On request.
- Does Authentise or Oqton run on more platforms?
- Authentise runs on Web, API. Oqton runs on Web, Windows, API.
- What is Authentise best used for?
- Authentise is most often used for an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors, an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence, a defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under itar-compliant hosting, a corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sites. Of those, an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors and an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence are not what Oqton is typically brought in for.
- What can Authentise do that Oqton cannot?
- Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Machine data capture, Modular deployment, ITAR-capable hosting. Oqton covers Manufacturing OS, Build preparation, Machine connectivity, Automated nesting. Both handle Traceability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authentise: How is Authentise priced?
It is not published. Licensing is modular and quoted annually, with integration and onboarding priced separately.
Oqton: Who owns Oqton?
3D Systems, which acquired it in 2021 and made it the central software brand.
Authentise: Can it handle ITAR-controlled work?
Yes. It offers ITAR-compliant deployment alongside public cloud and private SaaS, which is a primary reason defence suppliers choose it.
Oqton: Did Oqton include Geomagic?
It did. 3D Systems completed the sale of the Geomagic portfolio, including Design X, Control X, Freeform and Wrap, to Hexagon for $123 million in April 2025. Oqton retained 3D Sprint, 3DXpert and the Manufacturing OS.
Authentise: Does it work with printers from more than one manufacturer?
Yes. It is designed for mixed fleets and captures machine data across vendors, which single-vendor software will not do.
Oqton: Does Oqton work with printers from other manufacturers?
It connects to multi-vendor equipment, but the deepest integration and support is on 3D Systems machines.
Authentise: Is it a full MES for a general machine shop?
No. It is built around additive workflows; subtractive-heavy shops need a general MES as well.
Oqton: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted annually, typically on connected machines and sites, with build preparation modules licensed separately.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authentise vs Fulcrum
- Authentise vs Tulip
- Authentise vs MachineMetrics
- Authentise vs 3YOURMIND
- Authentise vs Prodsmart
- Authentise vs TrakSYS
- Authentise vs AMFG
- Authentise vs Materialise Magics
- Authentise vs Flow Software
- Authentise vs ProShop ERP
- Authentise vs Ignition
- Authentise vs QAD Redzone
- Authentise vs Seeq
- Authentise vs Sensemore
- Authentise vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Authentise vs Simplify3D
- Authentise vs TrendMiner
- Authentise vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Authentise vs GrabCAD Print
- Authentise vs Formlabs PreForm
- Authentise vs Markforged Eiger
- Authentise vs Duro PLM
- Authentise vs Dyndrite
- Authentise vs Erbessd Instruments
- Authentise vs Fictiv
- Oqton vs Fulcrum
- Oqton vs Tulip
- Oqton vs MachineMetrics
- Oqton vs 3YOURMIND
- Oqton vs Prodsmart
- Oqton vs TrakSYS
- Oqton vs AMFG
- Oqton vs Materialise Magics
- Oqton vs Flow Software
- Oqton vs ProShop ERP
- Oqton vs Ignition
- Oqton vs QAD Redzone
- Oqton vs Seeq
- Oqton vs Sensemore
- Oqton vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Oqton vs Simplify3D
- Oqton vs TrendMiner
- Oqton vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Oqton vs GrabCAD Print
- Oqton vs Formlabs PreForm
- Oqton vs Markforged Eiger
- Oqton vs Duro PLM
- Oqton vs Dyndrite
- Oqton vs Erbessd Instruments
- Oqton vs Fictiv
