Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Laserfiche

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Laserfiche self-hosted deployment requires dedicated IT resources and infrastructure management
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Laserfiche covers Document Capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Laserfiche actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Laserfiche |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $50/month |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 1976 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Laserfiche
- Document Capture
- Workflow Automation
- Records Management
- Electronic Forms
- Process Automation
- Microsoft Office
- SharePoint
- Salesforce
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Laserfiche
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Laserfiche
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Laserfiche
Laserfiche
- Citizen Servicesnot authentik
- Records Managementnot authentik
- Public Safetynot authentik
- Civic Engagementnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Laserfiche
- Self-hosted deployment requires dedicated IT resources and infrastructure management
- Complex implementation often requires significant upfront customization
- High total cost of ownership for on-premises deployments due to infrastructure needs
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Laserfiche
$50/month- Cloud$50/month
- Document Management
- Workflow Automation
- Records Management
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Laserfiche if
- You need document capture.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want workflow automation.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Laserfiche better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Laserfiche at $50/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Laserfiche?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and $50/month for Laserfiche.
- Does authentik or Laserfiche run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Laserfiche runs on Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Laserfiche starts at $50/month.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Laserfiche is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Laserfiche cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Laserfiche covers Document Capture, Workflow Automation, Records Management, Electronic Forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Laserfiche: Does Laserfiche offer both cloud and self-hosted options?
Yes. Laserfiche Cloud offers three tiers (Starter $53/user/month, Professional $73, Business $93). Laserfiche 12 provides self-hosted deployment for organizations requiring on-premise infrastructure or with strict security and regulatory constraints.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Laserfiche: What does Laserfiche capture from documents?
Laserfiche provides document capture, electronic forms, workflow automation, case management, mobile access, and government-certified records management with automatic filing and retention schedules.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Laserfiche: Can Laserfiche track document workflows automatically?
Yes. Laserfiche includes workflow automation that tracks and fulfills processes like FOIA requests, with access controls, audit trails, and automated recordkeeping for compliance.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs DocuWare
- authentik vs OnBase
- authentik vs CivicPlus
- authentik vs Legistar
- authentik vs CKAN
- authentik vs Socrata
- authentik vs IAPro
- authentik vs SAP for Government
- authentik vs Axon Records
- authentik vs NextRequest
- authentik vs VUEWorks
- authentik vs ShotSpotter
- authentik vs Springbrook Software
- authentik vs Vigilant Solutions
- authentik vs Workday Government
- authentik vs Zencity
- authentik vs Granicus
- authentik vs Tyler Brazos
- Laserfiche vs Authelia
- Laserfiche vs Logto
- Laserfiche vs Ory
- Laserfiche vs Passbolt
- Laserfiche vs Clerk
- Laserfiche vs 1Password
- Laserfiche vs Frontegg
- Laserfiche vs OWASP ZAP
- Laserfiche vs Infisical
- Laserfiche vs Chainguard
- Laserfiche vs Bitwarden
- Laserfiche vs Cosign
- Laserfiche vs CyberGhost VPN
- Laserfiche vs Dahua Technology
- Laserfiche vs Descope
- Laserfiche vs Drata
- Laserfiche vs DTiQ
- Laserfiche vs Ory Kratos
- Laserfiche vs DocuWare
- Laserfiche vs OnBase
- Laserfiche vs CivicPlus
- Laserfiche vs Legistar
- Laserfiche vs CKAN
- Laserfiche vs Socrata
- Laserfiche vs IAPro
- Laserfiche vs SAP for Government
- Laserfiche vs Axon Records
- Laserfiche vs NextRequest
- Laserfiche vs VUEWorks
- Laserfiche vs ShotSpotter
- Laserfiche vs Springbrook Software
- Laserfiche vs Vigilant Solutions
- Laserfiche vs Workday Government
- Laserfiche vs Zencity
- Laserfiche vs Granicus
- Laserfiche vs Tyler Brazos

