Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Entrust Identity as a Service

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Entrust Identity as a Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Entrust Identity as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2/month |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Chainguard
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Chainguard
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Chainguard
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Entrust Identity as a Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Entrust Identity as a Service?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service.
- Does Chainguard or Entrust Identity as a Service run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Entrust Identity as a Service is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Entrust Identity as a Service cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Cisco Duo
- Chainguard vs JumpCloud
- Chainguard vs Ping Identity
- Chainguard vs Frontegg
- Chainguard vs Beyond Identity
- Chainguard vs Transmit Security
- Chainguard vs Akeyless
- Chainguard vs authentik
- Chainguard vs Speakeasy
- Chainguard vs Authy
- Chainguard vs ExpressVPN
- Chainguard vs Falco
- Chainguard vs Fenergo
- Chainguard vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Snyk
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Trivy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Doppler
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Infisical
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Arnica
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs HashiCorp Vault
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bitwarden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Semgrep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Endor Labs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tenable
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Idira
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs IVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Malwarebytes
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
