Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs Chevin FleetWave

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Chevin FleetWave
Fleet Management
Fleet management system covering vehicles and equipment assets, sold in three tiers from FleetWave Lite at £3 per vehicle per month upward
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; Chevin FleetWave only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and Chevin FleetWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlas.co | Chevin FleetWave |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Per vehicle per month (Lite); quote for Core and Advanced |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in Chevin FleetWave
- Maintenance scheduling
- Compliance tracking
- Fuel management
- Total cost of ownership reporting
- Multi-asset tracking
- Accident and incident recording
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot Chevin FleetWave
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot Chevin FleetWave
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot Chevin FleetWave
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot Chevin FleetWave
Chevin FleetWave
- A smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance trackingnot Atlas.co
- A mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate toolsnot Atlas.co
- An operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset typenot Atlas.co
- A fleet outgrowing FleetWave Lite and needing Core or Advanced tier compliance and reporting depthnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
Chevin FleetWave
- Only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.
- Pricing is in GBP by default, reflecting Chevin UK base, which adds currency conversion uncertainty for buyers budgeting in other currencies before a formal quote.
- The Lite tier is explicitly a simpler feature set, so a fleet that starts there and later needs compliance depth or multi-asset TCO reporting faces a tier upgrade and a new, unpublished price negotiation.
- As a UK-headquartered vendor, integration depth with US-centric telematics and fuel card providers may be less mature than with UK and European partners.
- Equipment and asset pricing at $0.50 per asset is a separate line item from the vehicle rate, so a mixed vehicle-and-equipment fleet needs to calculate two different per-unit costs to budget accurately.
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
Chevin FleetWave
On request- FleetWave Lite$undefined/month
- £3 per vehicle per month
- Equipment and associated assets $0.50 per asset
- Simpler feature set aimed at smaller or less complex fleets
- FleetWave Core / Advanced$undefined/year
- No published pricing, consultation required
- Expanded compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting features
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose Chevin FleetWave if
- You need maintenance scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want compliance tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or Chevin FleetWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and Chevin FleetWave at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or Chevin FleetWave?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and On request for Chevin FleetWave.
- Does Atlas.co or Chevin FleetWave run on more platforms?
- Atlas.co runs on Web. Chevin FleetWave runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Chevin FleetWave starts at On request.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what Chevin FleetWave is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that Chevin FleetWave cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, Compliance tracking, Fuel management, Total cost of ownership reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
Chevin FleetWave: Is FleetWave pricing public?
Only for the Lite tier, at £3 per vehicle per month plus $0.50 per equipment asset. Core and Advanced tiers require a consultation.
Atlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
Chevin FleetWave: What is the difference between Lite, Core and Advanced?
Lite is a simpler feature set for smaller or less complex fleets; Core and Advanced add compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting depth, priced separately.
Atlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
Chevin FleetWave: Does it track non-vehicle equipment?
Yes, equipment and associated assets are tracked within the same platform, priced separately from vehicles.
Atlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
More on Chevin FleetWave
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Samsara
- Atlas.co vs AssetWorks
- Atlas.co vs Geotab
- Atlas.co vs Verizon Connect
- Atlas.co vs Azuga
- Atlas.co vs Omnitracs
- Atlas.co vs Whip Around
- Atlas.co vs Fleet Complete
- Atlas.co vs CalAmp
- Atlas.co vs Uptake
- Atlas.co vs Motive
- Atlas.co vs Route4Me
- Atlas.co vs Lytx
- Atlas.co vs NexTraq
- Atlas.co vs Quartix
- Atlas.co vs Ridecell
- Atlas.co vs Webfleet
- Chevin FleetWave vs Esri ArcGIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs CARTO
- Chevin FleetWave vs QGIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Felt
- Chevin FleetWave vs Correlator3D
- Chevin FleetWave vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Chevin FleetWave vs Global Mapper
- Chevin FleetWave vs GRASS GIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Fused
- Chevin FleetWave vs deck.gl
- Chevin FleetWave vs Ride with GPS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Kepler.gl
- Chevin FleetWave vs Foursquare Places API
- Chevin FleetWave vs Geoapify
- Chevin FleetWave vs Google Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Leica Infinity
- Chevin FleetWave vs Samsara
- Chevin FleetWave vs AssetWorks
- Chevin FleetWave vs Geotab
- Chevin FleetWave vs Verizon Connect
- Chevin FleetWave vs Azuga
- Chevin FleetWave vs Omnitracs
- Chevin FleetWave vs Whip Around
- Chevin FleetWave vs Fleet Complete
- Chevin FleetWave vs CalAmp
- Chevin FleetWave vs Uptake
- Chevin FleetWave vs Motive
- Chevin FleetWave vs Route4Me
- Chevin FleetWave vs Lytx
- Chevin FleetWave vs NexTraq
- Chevin FleetWave vs Quartix
- Chevin FleetWave vs Ridecell
- Chevin FleetWave vs Webfleet
