Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs Verizon Connect

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Verizon Connect
Fleet Management
See clearly. Act quickly. Drive change.
- From
- $40/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; Verizon Connect no transparent pricing published; requires contacting sales representatives
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Verizon Connect covers Real-time GPS tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and Verizon Connect actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlas.co | Verizon Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $40/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Ios, Android, Api |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
| Founded | Unknown | 2018 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in Verizon Connect
- Real-time GPS tracking
- Route optimization
- Driver behavior monitoring
- ELD/HOS compliance
- IFTA reporting
- Fuel management
- Maintenance alerts
- Dispatch management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot Verizon Connect
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot Verizon Connect
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot Verizon Connect
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot Verizon Connect
Verizon Connect
- Fleet visibilitynot Atlas.co
- Route optimizationnot Atlas.co
- Compliance managementnot Atlas.co
- Driver safetynot Atlas.co
- Cost reductionnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
Verizon Connect
- No transparent pricing published; requires contacting sales representatives
- No free trial or freemium option mentioned
- No feature-specific or a la carte pricing breakdown
- Vague ROI claims without implementation cost or timeline details
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
Verizon Connect
$40/month- Reveal$40/month
- GPS tracking
- Trip history
- Geofencing
- Reveal Plus$60/month
- Everything in Reveal
- ELD compliance
- IFTA reporting
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Full platform access
- Video telematics
- Custom integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose Verizon Connect if
- You need real-time gps tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want route optimization.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or Verizon Connect better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and Verizon Connect at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or Verizon Connect?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and $40/month for Verizon Connect.
- Does Atlas.co or Verizon Connect run on more platforms?
- Atlas.co runs on Web. Verizon Connect runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Verizon Connect starts at $40/month.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what Verizon Connect is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that Verizon Connect cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. Verizon Connect covers Real-time GPS tracking, Route optimization, Driver behavior monitoring, ELD/HOS compliance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
Verizon Connect: How much does Verizon Connect cost?
Verizon Connect does not publish pricing on its website. Contact sales at (866) 844-2235 or request a callback for a custom quote. Plans are tailored to Small Business, Mid Market (50+ vehicles), and Enterprise.
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
Verizon Connect: Does Verizon Connect offer a free trial?
The website does not mention a free trial or freemium option. Contact sales directly to inquire about trial availability.
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
Verizon Connect: What payment options are available?
Payment options and billing terms are not disclosed on the public website. Contact Verizon Connect sales to discuss custom payment arrangements for your organization's needs.
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
More on Verizon Connect
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Fleet Complete
- Atlas.co vs GPS Trackit
- Atlas.co vs Motive
- Atlas.co vs NexTraq
- Atlas.co vs Quartix
- Atlas.co vs Chevin FleetWave
- Atlas.co vs Samsara
- Atlas.co vs Geotab
- Atlas.co vs Azuga
- Atlas.co vs Omnitracs
- Atlas.co vs AssetWorks
- Atlas.co vs Ridecell
- Atlas.co vs Uptake
- Atlas.co vs Webfleet
- Atlas.co vs Whip Around
- Atlas.co vs Zonar Systems
- Atlas.co vs Lytx
- Verizon Connect vs Esri ArcGIS
- Verizon Connect vs CARTO
- Verizon Connect vs QGIS
- Verizon Connect vs Felt
- Verizon Connect vs Correlator3D
- Verizon Connect vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Verizon Connect vs Global Mapper
- Verizon Connect vs GRASS GIS
- Verizon Connect vs Fused
- Verizon Connect vs deck.gl
- Verizon Connect vs Ride with GPS
- Verizon Connect vs Kepler.gl
- Verizon Connect vs Foursquare Places API
- Verizon Connect vs Geoapify
- Verizon Connect vs Google Maps
- Verizon Connect vs Leica Infinity
- Verizon Connect vs Fleet Complete
- Verizon Connect vs GPS Trackit
- Verizon Connect vs Motive
- Verizon Connect vs NexTraq
- Verizon Connect vs Quartix
- Verizon Connect vs Chevin FleetWave
- Verizon Connect vs Samsara
- Verizon Connect vs Geotab
- Verizon Connect vs Azuga
- Verizon Connect vs Omnitracs
- Verizon Connect vs AssetWorks
- Verizon Connect vs Ridecell
- Verizon Connect vs Uptake
- Verizon Connect vs Webfleet
- Verizon Connect vs Whip Around
- Verizon Connect vs Zonar Systems
- Verizon Connect vs Lytx
