Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs CARTO

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; CARTO no prices are published; the committed tiers are all quote-only
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, CARTO covers Spatial Analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and CARTO actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in CARTO
- Spatial Analysis
- Interactive Maps
- Data Observatory
- Workflows
- APIs
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot CARTO
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot CARTO
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot CARTO
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot CARTO
CARTO
- Spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehousenot Atlas.co
- Building interactive maps and location dashboardsnot Atlas.co
- Geocoding and routing through location data servicesnot Atlas.co
- Site selection and territory planningnot Atlas.co
- Self-hosted geospatial analytics for regulated environmentsnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
CARTO
- No prices are published; the committed tiers are all quote-only
- Metered on four separate axes: workflow runs, map loads, API calls and location data service operations
- API access and tokens are limited on pay-as-you-go and unlimited only from the Strategic tier
- Self-hosting is available on Enterprise and included only on the Custom tier
- The 14 day trial explicitly forbids production use
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
CARTO
On request- Pay As You Go$null/mo
- Metered, capped location data services
- Limited API access and tokens
- Standard support
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Limited location data services with quota
- Limited API access and tokens
- Standard or Premium support
- Strategic$null/mo
- Unlimited API access and tokens
- Premium or Elite support
- Custom branding
- Custom$null/mo
- Up to unlimited location data services
- Unlimited API access and tokens
- Elite support
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or CARTO better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and CARTO at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or CARTO?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and On request for CARTO.
- Does Atlas.co or CARTO run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CARTO starts at On request.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what CARTO is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that CARTO cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. CARTO covers Spatial Analysis, Interactive Maps, Data Observatory, Workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
CARTO: What CARTO pricing tiers are available?
CARTO offers Pay As You Go (monthly, consumption-based), Enterprise (annual commitment with limited quotas), Strategic (annual with unlimited API access), and Custom (annual with full services for large enterprises). Enterprise and higher require contacting sales.
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
CARTO: Does CARTO have a free version?
CARTO does not advertise a free tier. The Pay As You Go plan requires monthly payments based on consumption with capped services.
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
CARTO: What is included in the CARTO Strategic plan?
Strategic tier includes unlimited API access and tokens, premium or elite support, custom branding, audit logs, and usage metrics. It requires an annual commitment and custom pricing quote.
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Mapbox
- Atlas.co vs HERE Technologies
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps Platform
- Atlas.co vs Apple Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leaflet
- Atlas.co vs Lonboard
- Atlas.co vs Navmii GPS
- Atlas.co vs Nominatim
- Atlas.co vs OpenLayers
- Atlas.co vs OpenRouteService
- Atlas.co vs OpenStreetMap
- Atlas.co vs OsmAnd
- CARTO vs Esri ArcGIS
- CARTO vs QGIS
- CARTO vs Felt
- CARTO vs Correlator3D
- CARTO vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- CARTO vs Global Mapper
- CARTO vs GRASS GIS
- CARTO vs Fused
- CARTO vs deck.gl
- CARTO vs Ride with GPS
- CARTO vs Kepler.gl
- CARTO vs Foursquare Places API
- CARTO vs Geoapify
- CARTO vs Google Maps
- CARTO vs Leica Infinity
- CARTO vs Mapbox
- CARTO vs HERE Technologies
- CARTO vs Google Maps Platform
- CARTO vs Apple Maps
- CARTO vs Leaflet
- CARTO vs Lonboard
- CARTO vs Navmii GPS
- CARTO vs Nominatim
- CARTO vs OpenLayers
- CARTO vs OpenRouteService
- CARTO vs OpenStreetMap
- CARTO vs OsmAnd

