Fleet Management · head to head
AssetWorks vs Atlas.co

AssetWorks
Fleet Management
Fleet and enterprise asset management software built for government and public sector buyers, owned by Constellation Software subsidiary Volaris Group
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: AssetWorks pricing is entirely unpublished and reportedly often includes ancillary fees beyond the headline licence or subscription cost, making total cost of ownership hard to estimate before a formal quote.; Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- They diverge on capability: AssetWorks covers Fleet lifecycle tracking, Atlas.co covers Browser GIS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AssetWorks and Atlas.co actually diverge.
| Attribute | AssetWorks | Atlas.co |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AssetWorks
- Fleet lifecycle tracking
- Preventative maintenance scheduling
- Fuel management
- Inspection and licensing compliance
- Enterprise Asset Management integration
- Public-sector procurement fit
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AssetWorks
- A municipal or county government needing fleet management that integrates with broader roads, facilities and parks asset managementnot Atlas.co
- A public utility needing fuel, maintenance and compliance tracking suited to public-sector audit requirementsnot Atlas.co
- A government buyer wanting to procure through an existing competitively solicited group purchasing agreement rather than an independent RFPnot Atlas.co
- An agency wanting a stable, long-term software vendor backed by Constellation Software acquire-and-hold ownership model rather than a venture-backed startupnot Atlas.co
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot AssetWorks
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot AssetWorks
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot AssetWorks
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot AssetWorks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AssetWorks
- Pricing is entirely unpublished and reportedly often includes ancillary fees beyond the headline licence or subscription cost, making total cost of ownership hard to estimate before a formal quote.
- Being owned by Constellation Software, known for acquiring and holding software businesses with limited reinvestment pressure, can mean slower feature innovation compared with venture-backed competitors racing to add AI and modern UX.
- The platform is explicitly built and marketed around public-sector procurement and workflow needs, so a private commercial fleet may find it less tailored to their process than a fleet-first competitor.
- Multi-year public-sector contracts reduce flexibility to switch providers even if requirements or the competitive landscape change during the term.
- Choosing between perpetual licence and SaaS subscription is itself a significant decision with different long-term cost profiles, and neither option pricing is published to compare in advance.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
AssetWorks
On request- FleetFocus$undefined/year
- Perpetual licence or SaaS subscription options
- No published pricing, quote required
- Contracts typically multi-year with ancillary fees reported
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
Which should you pick?
Choose AssetWorks if
- You need fleet lifecycle tracking.
- You also want preventative maintenance scheduling.
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Questions people ask
- Is AssetWorks or Atlas.co better?
- Neither clearly leads. AssetWorks starts at On request and Atlas.co at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AssetWorks or Atlas.co?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for AssetWorks and Free for Atlas.co.
- Does AssetWorks or Atlas.co run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. AssetWorks starts at On request.
- What is AssetWorks best used for?
- AssetWorks is most often used for a municipal or county government needing fleet management that integrates with broader roads, facilities and parks asset management, a public utility needing fuel, maintenance and compliance tracking suited to public-sector audit requirements, a government buyer wanting to procure through an existing competitively solicited group purchasing agreement rather than an independent rfp, an agency wanting a stable, long-term software vendor backed by constellation software acquire-and-hold ownership model rather than a venture-backed startup. Of those, a municipal or county government needing fleet management that integrates with broader roads, facilities and parks asset management and a public utility needing fuel, maintenance and compliance tracking suited to public-sector audit requirements are not what Atlas.co is typically brought in for.
- What can AssetWorks do that Atlas.co cannot?
- AssetWorks covers Fleet lifecycle tracking, Preventative maintenance scheduling, Fuel management, Inspection and licensing compliance. Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AssetWorks: Who owns AssetWorks?
Volaris Group, a division of Constellation Software, which acquires and holds vertical-market software businesses long term rather than growing and reselling them.
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
AssetWorks: Is AssetWorks only for government fleets?
It is primarily built and marketed for public sector buyers, though private fleets can also use it; government-specific features like competitive group purchasing access are a key differentiator.
Atlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
AssetWorks: Perpetual licence or SaaS?
Both options exist, but neither is priced publicly, so a buyer needs a quote to compare the two structures directly.
Atlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
Atlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- AssetWorks vs Chevin FleetWave
- AssetWorks vs Samsara
- AssetWorks vs Geotab
- AssetWorks vs Verizon Connect
- AssetWorks vs Azuga
- AssetWorks vs Omnitracs
- AssetWorks vs Fleet Complete
- AssetWorks vs Motive
- AssetWorks vs Webfleet
- AssetWorks vs Teletrac Navman
- AssetWorks vs CalAmp
- AssetWorks vs Lytx
- AssetWorks vs Quartix
- AssetWorks vs Ridecell
- AssetWorks vs Uptake
- AssetWorks vs Whip Around
- AssetWorks vs Zonar Systems
- AssetWorks vs Esri ArcGIS
- AssetWorks vs CARTO
- AssetWorks vs QGIS
- AssetWorks vs Felt
- AssetWorks vs Correlator3D
- AssetWorks vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- AssetWorks vs Global Mapper
- AssetWorks vs GRASS GIS
- AssetWorks vs Fused
- AssetWorks vs deck.gl
- AssetWorks vs Ride with GPS
- AssetWorks vs Kepler.gl
- AssetWorks vs Foursquare Places API
- AssetWorks vs Geoapify
- AssetWorks vs Google Maps
- AssetWorks vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Chevin FleetWave
- Atlas.co vs Samsara
- Atlas.co vs Geotab
- Atlas.co vs Verizon Connect
- Atlas.co vs Azuga
- Atlas.co vs Omnitracs
- Atlas.co vs Fleet Complete
- Atlas.co vs Motive
- Atlas.co vs Webfleet
- Atlas.co vs Teletrac Navman
- Atlas.co vs CalAmp
- Atlas.co vs Lytx
- Atlas.co vs Quartix
- Atlas.co vs Ridecell
- Atlas.co vs Uptake
- Atlas.co vs Whip Around
- Atlas.co vs Zonar Systems
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
