Construction · head to head
Assignar vs Handoff

Assignar
Construction
Crew, equipment and compliance dispatch for self-perform and speciality contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Handoff
Construction
AI estimating and proposals for residential remodelling contractors, priced per company not per seat
- From
- $119/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Assignar it is built for contractors who own crews and plant, so a general contractor coordinating subcontractors gets little from it beyond its own self-perform scopes.; Handoff pro and Scale require a 12 month commitment, so a seasonal remodeller who slows down over winter pays through the quiet months or stays on the more expensive month-to-month Flex tier
- They diverge on capability: Assignar covers Crew and equipment scheduling, Handoff covers Estimate from description.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Assignar and Handoff actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Assignar
- Crew and equipment scheduling
- Digital dockets and timesheets
- Compliance and competency tracking
- Forms and inspections
- Offline mobile capture
- Production and cost reporting
Only in Handoff
- Estimate from description
- Photo-based estimating
- AI takeoff
- Custom pricing catalogues
- Proposals and e-signature
- Change orders
- Invoicing and card payments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Assignar
- A civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch boardnot Handoff
- A concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days latenot Handoff
- A contractor that must prove operator competency and induction status on regulated sitesnot Handoff
- A self-perform contractor comparing actual crew hours against estimated production ratesnot Handoff
Handoff
- A remodelling contractor who visits four kitchens a week and wants a priced proposal out the same evening instead of three days laternot Assignar
- A roofing business whose owner writes every estimate personally and is the bottleneck on salesnot Assignar
- A small builder who wants proposal, change order and invoice in one record so the final billing reconciles to what the client signednot Assignar
- A contractor collecting payment by card who wants to cut the processing rate from 3.35 to 2.85 per cent by moving to the annual Pro tiernot Assignar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Assignar
- It is built for contractors who own crews and plant, so a general contractor coordinating subcontractors gets little from it beyond its own self-perform scopes.
- It is not an accounting or payroll system, so the value depends on a clean integration to your finance system and on someone owning the reconciliation when hours disagree.
- Australian origins show in terminology and compliance defaults, and North American users spend setup time translating concepts such as tickets and inductions into local equivalents.
- Offline capture works, but photo-heavy forms on poor connections remain the weak point and should be tested on your worst site before a full rollout.
- Supervisors have to maintain the schedule for the reporting to mean anything, and dispatchers used to a whiteboard resist that for months unless the change is enforced.
Handoff
- Pro and Scale require a 12 month commitment, so a seasonal remodeller who slows down over winter pays through the quiet months or stays on the more expensive month-to-month Flex tier
- AI-generated line item pricing is based on general cost data, not your suppliers or your subcontractors, so every estimate needs review and the time saving is smaller than the marketing implies once a real pricing catalogue is built
- AI takeoff only appears on the 899 dollar Scale tier and is capped at plans of 5,000 square feet, which excludes most light commercial and larger custom homes
- Flex includes only 50 AI credits a month and one pricing catalogue, which a busy estimator exhausts quickly, making the entry tier more of a trial than a working plan
- It targets residential remodelling specifically, with no scheduling, no field production tracking and no job costing depth, so a growing contractor outgrows it and migrates to a full construction management platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Assignar
On request- Assignar$undefined/year
- Crew and equipment scheduling
- Digital dockets and timesheets
- Compliance tracking
Handoff
$119/month- Flex$119/month
- Billed annually, 149 USD month to month
- 2 users
- 50 AI credits a month
- Pro$239/month
- Billed annually, 299 USD month to month
- 12 month commitment
- 5 users
- Scale$719/month
- Billed annually, 899 USD month to month
- 12 month commitment
- 5 users
- Custom API$undefined/year
- Quoted for multi-location businesses
- API access
- Custom integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Assignar if
- You need crew and equipment scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want digital dockets and timesheets.
Choose Handoff if
- You need estimate from description.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want photo-based estimating.
Questions people ask
- Is Assignar or Handoff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Assignar starts at On request and Handoff at $119/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Assignar or Handoff?
- Assignar starts at On request and Handoff at $119/month.
- Does Assignar or Handoff run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Assignar best used for?
- Assignar is most often used for a civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch board, a concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days late, a contractor that must prove operator competency and induction status on regulated sites, a self-perform contractor comparing actual crew hours against estimated production rates. Of those, a civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch board and a concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days late are not what Handoff is typically brought in for.
- What can Assignar do that Handoff cannot?
- Assignar covers Crew and equipment scheduling, Digital dockets and timesheets, Compliance and competency tracking, Forms and inspections. Handoff covers Estimate from description, Photo-based estimating, AI takeoff, Custom pricing catalogues.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Assignar: Is this for general contractors or subcontractors?
Speciality and self-perform contractors. The unit of work is a crew and a machine on a shift, which is not how a general contractor coordinates trades.
Handoff: What does Handoff actually cost?
From 119 US dollars a month billed annually on Flex for two users, 239 on Pro for five users, and 719 on Scale which is the only tier with AI takeoff. Month to month prices are 149, 299 and 899.
Assignar: Does the mobile app work without signal?
Yes, entries are captured offline and synchronised later. Test it with photos attached on your worst site, because that is where sync problems appear.
Handoff: Is the card processing fee on top of the subscription?
Yes. It is 3.35 per cent on Flex and 2.85 per cent on Pro and Scale, charged on payments you collect through the platform.
Assignar: Does it handle payroll?
No. It captures hours and quantities and passes them to your payroll or enterprise resource planning system.
Handoff: Does it do commercial construction?
No. It is built for residential remodelling scopes and its cost data and takeoff limits reflect that.
Handoff: Can I cancel monthly?
Only on Flex. Pro and Scale carry a 12 month commitment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Assignar vs HCSS
- Assignar vs Raken
- Assignar vs Procore
- Assignar vs GCPay
- Assignar vs Topcon MAGNET
- Assignar vs Kojo
- Assignar vs Siteline
- Assignar vs Clearstory
- Assignar vs HammerTech
- Assignar vs ConstructConnect
- Assignar vs CMiC
- Assignar vs Document Crunch
- Assignar vs JobTread
- Assignar vs Jonas Premier
- Assignar vs Kahua
- Assignar vs Navisworks
- Assignar vs Newforma
- Assignar vs PlanSwift
- Assignar vs Buildertrend
- Assignar vs Togal.AI
- Assignar vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Assignar vs Cubit Estimating
- Assignar vs B2W Estimate
- Assignar vs RIB CostX
- Assignar vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Assignar vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Assignar vs Openspace
- Assignar vs Microsoft Project
- Assignar vs Egnyte
- Assignar vs Fieldwire
- Assignar vs Primavera P6
- Assignar vs Revit
- Handoff vs HCSS
- Handoff vs Raken
- Handoff vs Procore
- Handoff vs GCPay
- Handoff vs Topcon MAGNET
- Handoff vs Kojo
- Handoff vs Siteline
- Handoff vs Clearstory
- Handoff vs HammerTech
- Handoff vs ConstructConnect
- Handoff vs CMiC
- Handoff vs Document Crunch
- Handoff vs JobTread
- Handoff vs Jonas Premier
- Handoff vs Kahua
- Handoff vs Navisworks
- Handoff vs Newforma
- Handoff vs PlanSwift
- Handoff vs Buildertrend
- Handoff vs Togal.AI
- Handoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Handoff vs Cubit Estimating
- Handoff vs B2W Estimate
- Handoff vs RIB CostX
- Handoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Handoff vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Handoff vs Openspace
- Handoff vs Microsoft Project
- Handoff vs Egnyte
- Handoff vs Fieldwire
- Handoff vs Primavera P6
- Handoff vs Revit
