Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs MAPS.ME

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

MAPS.ME
Maps
Free, offline maps application based on OpenStreetMap data
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MAPS.ME has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; MAPS.ME mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, MAPS.ME covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and MAPS.ME actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | MAPS.ME |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | iOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in MAPS.ME
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot MAPS.ME
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot MAPS.ME
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot MAPS.ME
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot MAPS.ME
MAPS.ME
- Downloading offline maps for travel without connectivitynot Agisoft Metashape
- Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation without datanot Agisoft Metashape
- Finding points of interest and hiking trailsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Following built-in travel guidesnot Agisoft Metashape
- Hotel booking via Booking.com integrationnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
MAPS.ME
- Mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
- Free tier limits offline map downloads and shows monetization prompts
- No native Windows, macOS, or Linux app
- Map data comes from the OpenStreetMap community rather than a commercial map provider
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
MAPS.ME
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MAPS.ME review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose MAPS.ME if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or MAPS.ME better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and MAPS.ME at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or MAPS.ME?
- MAPS.ME has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for MAPS.ME.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or MAPS.ME run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. MAPS.ME runs on iOS, Android.
- Can I use MAPS.ME for free?
- Yes. MAPS.ME has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what MAPS.ME is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that MAPS.ME cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. MAPS.ME covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
MAPS.ME: Is MAPS.ME free to download and use?
MAPS.ME is available as a free download for both iOS via App Store and Android via Google Play. No pricing information is published on the MAPS.ME website, suggesting a free service model.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
MAPS.ME: What features are included in MAPS.ME?
MAPS.ME is marketed as 'not just an app but a friend in all your adventures.' Full feature details require downloading the app from App Store or Google Play. Specific limitations or premium features are not disclosed on the website.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
MAPS.ME: How does MAPS.ME make money if the app is free?
MAPS.ME does not publish pricing or monetization details on its website. The app is available free on both iOS and Android platforms, but the business model for generating revenue is not disclosed publicly.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies
- Agisoft Metashape vs OsmAnd
- Agisoft Metashape vs Navmii GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenStreetMap
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ride with GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs AllTrails
- Agisoft Metashape vs Citymapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mappedin
- Agisoft Metashape vs MapTiler
- Agisoft Metashape vs WhiteboxTools
- MAPS.ME vs QGIS
- MAPS.ME vs Correlator3D
- MAPS.ME vs Global Mapper
- MAPS.ME vs Cesium ion
- MAPS.ME vs Potree
- MAPS.ME vs Leica Infinity
- MAPS.ME vs Emlid Studio
- MAPS.ME vs onX Maps
- MAPS.ME vs SW Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Fused
- MAPS.ME vs Lonboard
- MAPS.ME vs Trailforks
- MAPS.ME vs Atlas.co
- MAPS.ME vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Felt
- MAPS.ME vs Geographic Calculator
- MAPS.ME vs Apple Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Mapbox
- MAPS.ME vs Google Maps Platform
- MAPS.ME vs HERE Technologies
- MAPS.ME vs OsmAnd
- MAPS.ME vs Navmii GPS
- MAPS.ME vs OpenRouteService
- MAPS.ME vs OpenStreetMap
- MAPS.ME vs Ride with GPS
- MAPS.ME vs AllTrails
- MAPS.ME vs Citymapper
- MAPS.ME vs Mappedin
- MAPS.ME vs MapTiler
- MAPS.ME vs WhiteboxTools
