Softwr
Suzy logo

Suzy

Enterprise consumer insights on an owned US panel, resold elsewhere through Cint

As of 31 August 2026, Suzy's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A quant and qual research platform whose speed advantage rests on Crowdtap, its own US consumer panel of around a million people. Softwr lists it under Research. Suzy is made by Suzy, Inc., available on Web, iOS, Android.

Overview

What Suzy does

Suzy runs quantitative surveys, moderated qualitative sessions through Suzy Live, and panel access through Suzy Audiences, with advanced methods including MaxDiff, TURF, conjoint and crosstabs, plus video open ends, voice responses via Suzy Speaks, and a Data Explorer for analysis across studies. In April 2026 the company publicly refounded itself as an AI Decision Engine with new Intelligence, Insights and Impact modules connecting market data and strategy documents to consumer voice. The reason enterprise insights teams buy it is turnaround. Because Suzy owns Crowdtap, a US consumer panel of roughly a million people with around fifty thousand verified active monthly, it can field a study and return results in hours rather than the days a panel broker needs. That is genuinely different from commissioning fieldwork, and it is what supports a median contract reported in the high tens of thousands of dollars per year. The unadvertised limit is that the owned panel is US only. Every international market is resold through Cint, Suzy’s global panel supply partner, which means for any non-US study you are paying Suzy’s enterprise margin on panel you could buy directly, and the speed and verification story evaporates. Customers have explicitly asked Suzy to build proprietary panels with native speakers in Germany, France, Japan, India and Brazil, which tells you those do not exist. The second thing to weigh: the April 2026 repositioning happened while headcount fell from around 230 to 186, so if you are buying the classic insights platform, ask what share of the 2027 roadmap goes to Insights and Live rather than to the new Intelligence and Impact layer.

What people use it for

  • A US consumer packaged goods brand that needs concept testing back the same day because a packaging decision is due at the end of the week.
  • An insights department running an always-on brand tracker on a US audience without re-commissioning fieldwork every wave.
  • A team that wants quant screening followed immediately by moderated qual with the same respondents, rather than two vendors and two timelines.
  • A product team testing claims and price sensitivity with MaxDiff and conjoint on a panel they can go back to repeatedly.

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Suzy.

  • The proprietary Crowdtap panel is US only at around a million consumers with roughly 50,000 verified active monthly, and everything international is resold Cint supply, so the speed and verification argument that justifies the price applies to one market.
  • Customers have asked Suzy to build proprietary panels with native speakers in Germany, France, Japan, India and Brazil, which confirms those do not exist today; multi-market brands need a second vendor and lose the single-source comparison.
  • Reviewers report the panel skews female and millennial and falls short on Gen Z, male and various ethnic segments, and that niche or B2B audiences are hard to reach, so quota fills can be slow or impossible.
  • Reviewers also raise data trust concerns about respondent sourcing and vetting, including one naming bot responses and acquiescence bias, which is the standing risk of any single owned opt-in panel with repeat respondents.
  • Pricing is a sales-led annual commitment reported to run around $88,000 a year at the median with onboarding fees and per-seat charges on top, with no trial, no self-serve and no pay-per-response option, so there is no cheap way to validate fit.
  • Credits are pre-committed monthly against forecast activity with no published overage rate, so under-use is wasted spend and a busy quarter triggers an unbudgeted purchase.
  • Integrations are genuinely thin: there is no public integrations page and no public API documentation, and the only confirmed external data relationship is Cint, so expect to move data by export.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Suzy

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • Suzy logo
    Suzy
    vs
    Qualtrics EmployeeXM logo
    Qualtrics EmployeeXM

    Qualtrics EmployeeXM: Qualtrics is the choice when you need a research platform that integrates with the rest of an enterprise experience management stack.

  • Suzy logo
    Suzy
    vs
    Attest logo
    Attest

    Attest: Attest offers consumer research with published pricing and stronger UK and European panel coverage.

  • Suzy logo
    Suzy
    vs
    SurveyMonkey logo
    SurveyMonkey

    SurveyMonkey: SurveyMonkey with Audience is far cheaper for occasional consumer studies where same-day turnaround is not the requirement.

Pricing

What Suzy costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Suzy

On request

  • Annual subscription with pre-committed monthly research credits
  • Credit volume set against forecast study activity
  • Onboarding fees and per-seat charges quoted separately
  • No published tier names, no free trial, no free version
  • Suzy Live and advanced methods scoped into the contract

Capabilities

Features

  • Suzy Insights

    Quantitative surveys, ad hoc and always-on trackers

  • Suzy Live

    Moderated qualitative interviews and focus groups

  • Suzy Audiences

    Access to the Crowdtap US panel and Cint supply internationally

  • Suzy Speaks

    Collects voice-driven open-ended responses

  • Video open ends

    Captures respondent video answers to open questions

  • Advanced methods

    MaxDiff, TURF, conjoint analysis and crosstabs

  • Data Explorer

    Analyses results across multiple studies in one view

  • AI Decision Engine

    Connects market data, strategy documents and consumer voice into recommendations

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Is the panel global?

No. Crowdtap, the owned panel, is US only. International studies run on Cint supply, which you could contract for directly.

What does it cost?

Nothing is published. Third-party analysis puts the median contract around $88,000 a year with a range roughly $34,000 to $187,500, plus onboarding and per-seat fees.

Is there an API?

Nothing public. Suzy publishes no API documentation and no named connectors beyond Cint. Verify any integration requirement in the sales call before committing.

What changed in April 2026?

Suzy repositioned as an AI Decision Engine with Intelligence and Impact modules, while headcount fell from about 230 to 186. Ask how the roadmap is now split between that and the classic survey and qual products.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from Suzy

Best Research software for

Compare Suzy with

Other Research software

  • Turn feedback into action

    Free, then 99/mo9 researched notes
  • Straightforward pricing for predictable research costs

    8 researched notes
  • Automated consumer insights platform for testing advertising, product concepts and brand health

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Live AI-moderated conversations with hundreds of participants at once, analysed in real time

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Access human insights and consumer insights from real people, instantly

    Free plan7 researched notes
  • UX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later

    From $49/mo13 researched notes
  • Enterprise R&D data platforms for biologics, screening and bioprocess, owned by Danaher

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Electronic data capture for regulated clinical trials, sold only through a sales process

    Pricing on request9 researched notes
  • Digital experience analytics platform

    9 researched notes
  • Open biomedical research platform for genomic analysis, priced only by the cloud you consume

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Enterprise LIMS with integrated ELN and biobanking capability

    Pricing on request13 researched notes
  • AI-powered customer intelligence and research repository.

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • Requirements and systems engineering for hardware teams, with published per-seat pricing

    From $999/yr12 researched notes
  • Symbolic and numeric computation environment built on the Wolfram Language and a curated knowledge base

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Collect, organize, annotate, cite and share your research

    Free, then $20/yr9 researched notes
  • The AI research assistant

    Free, then $49/mo9 researched notes
  • The free all-in-one reference manager

    Free, then $4.99/mo10 researched notes
  • Automated consumer insights platform for testing advertising, product concepts and brand health

    Pricing on request12 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Suzy, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on Suzy

Best Research software alternatives

Science-aware laboratory platform combining LIMS, ELN and scientific data management

quote

R&D cloud for biotechnology research and molecular biology

Free for academics, quoted for organisations

UX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later

Flat monthly fee, unlimited users

Cheminformatics toolkits and structure handling, now a Certara subsidiary

quote

Laboratory information management from Abbott for regulated and public health labs

quote

Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors

quote

Enterprise LIMS with integrated ELN and biobanking capability

quote

Enterprise laboratory information management system for regulated labs

quote

Compare Suzy with alternatives