Research · head to head
Aurelius vs Suzy

Aurelius
Research
UX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later
- From
- $49/month
- Rated
- -

Suzy
Research
Enterprise consumer insights on an owned US panel, resold elsewhere through Cint
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aurelius aurelius does not recruit participants or run unmoderated studies, so it is always a second tool alongside a testing or recruitment platform and never the whole research budget.; Suzy the proprietary Crowdtap panel is US only at around a million consumers with roughly 50,000 verified active monthly, and everything international is resold Cint supply, so the speed and verification argument that justifies the price applies to one market.
- They diverge on capability: Aurelius covers Research repository, Suzy covers Suzy Insights.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aurelius and Suzy actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aurelius
- Research repository
- Analysis board
- Tagging
- Insights and recommendations
- Transcription
- AI assist
- Automatic report builder
- Universal search
Only in Suzy
- Suzy Insights
- Suzy Live
- Suzy Audiences
- Suzy Speaks
- Video open ends
- Advanced methods
- Data Explorer
- AI Decision Engine
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aurelius
- A research team of three whose findings currently live in individual Miro boards and Google Docs that nobody outside the team can find six months laternot Suzy
- A product organisation that wants every designer and product manager to search past research without paying forty repository seatsnot Suzy
- A consultancy running discovery for multiple clients that needs tagged evidence kept separate per client but searchable internallynot Suzy
- A team preparing a repeat study who need to know what was already learned about the same problem two years ago before they recruit anyonenot Suzy
Suzy
- A US consumer packaged goods brand that needs concept testing back the same day because a packaging decision is due at the end of the week.not Aurelius
- An insights department running an always-on brand tracker on a US audience without re-commissioning fieldwork every wave.not Aurelius
- A team that wants quant screening followed immediately by moderated qual with the same respondents, rather than two vendors and two timelines.not Aurelius
- A product team testing claims and price sensitivity with MaxDiff and conjoint on a panel they can go back to repeatedly.not Aurelius
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aurelius
- Aurelius does not recruit participants or run unmoderated studies, so it is always a second tool alongside a testing or recruitment platform and never the whole research budget.
- Integrations are thin, with Zapier, Jira and Slack rather than direct connections to the call recording and testing tools most teams already run, so getting material in often means manual upload.
- The tag vocabulary is only as good as the discipline applied to it, and repositories where several researchers invent overlapping tags become unsearchable within a year with no built-in governance to prevent it.
- Unlimited users is genuinely unlimited but permissions are basic below Enterprise, so a team that needs client-safe or stakeholder-only views has to buy the quoted tier for something that reads as a table-stakes control.
- It is a small independent vendor competing with much better funded repositories, which is a real procurement risk for an organisation storing years of research in it, and enterprise assurance material such as penetration test reports sits behind the top tier.
Suzy
- The proprietary Crowdtap panel is US only at around a million consumers with roughly 50,000 verified active monthly, and everything international is resold Cint supply, so the speed and verification argument that justifies the price applies to one market.
- Customers have asked Suzy to build proprietary panels with native speakers in Germany, France, Japan, India and Brazil, which confirms those do not exist today; multi-market brands need a second vendor and lose the single-source comparison.
- Reviewers report the panel skews female and millennial and falls short on Gen Z, male and various ethnic segments, and that niche or B2B audiences are hard to reach, so quota fills can be slow or impossible.
- Reviewers also raise data trust concerns about respondent sourcing and vetting, including one naming bot responses and acquiescence bias, which is the standing risk of any single owned opt-in panel with repeat respondents.
- Pricing is a sales-led annual commitment reported to run around $88,000 a year at the median with onboarding fees and per-seat charges on top, with no trial, no self-serve and no pay-per-response option, so there is no cheap way to validate fit.
- Credits are pre-committed monthly against forecast activity with no published overage rate, so under-use is wasted spend and a busy quarter triggers an unbudgeted purchase.
- Integrations are genuinely thin: there is no public integrations page and no public API documentation, and the only confirmed external data relationship is Cint, so expect to move data by export.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aurelius
$49/month- Professional$49/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects and storage
- Notes, tags and documents
- Premium$199/month
- Everything in Professional
- Recommendations
- Universal search across projects
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Everything in Premium
- SSO with SAML 2.0
- IP allowlisting
Suzy
On request- Suzy$undefined/year
- Annual subscription with pre-committed monthly research credits
- Credit volume set against forecast study activity
- Onboarding fees and per-seat charges quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Suzy if
- You need suzy insights.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want suzy live.
Questions people ask
- Is Aurelius or Suzy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aurelius starts at $49/month and Suzy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aurelius or Suzy?
- Aurelius starts at $49/month and Suzy at On request.
- Does Aurelius or Suzy run on more platforms?
- Aurelius runs on Web. Suzy runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Aurelius best used for?
- Aurelius is most often used for a research team of three whose findings currently live in individual miro boards and google docs that nobody outside the team can find six months later, a product organisation that wants every designer and product manager to search past research without paying forty repository seats, a consultancy running discovery for multiple clients that needs tagged evidence kept separate per client but searchable internally, a team preparing a repeat study who need to know what was already learned about the same problem two years ago before they recruit anyone. Of those, a research team of three whose findings currently live in individual miro boards and google docs that nobody outside the team can find six months later and a product organisation that wants every designer and product manager to search past research without paying forty repository seats are not what Suzy is typically brought in for.
- What can Aurelius do that Suzy cannot?
- Aurelius covers Research repository, Analysis board, Tagging, Insights and recommendations. Suzy covers Suzy Insights, Suzy Live, Suzy Audiences, Suzy Speaks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aurelius: Does the price really include unlimited users?
Yes. Professional at 49 US dollars a month and Premium at 199, both billed yearly, both with unlimited users, projects and storage.
Suzy: Is the panel global?
No. Crowdtap, the owned panel, is US only. International studies run on Cint supply, which you could contract for directly.
Aurelius: Can I run usability tests in it?
No. Aurelius stores and analyses research; it does not recruit participants or host sessions. Pair it with a testing tool.
Suzy: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Third-party analysis puts the median contract around $88,000 a year with a range roughly $34,000 to $187,500, plus onboarding and per-seat fees.
Aurelius: What is the difference between Professional and Premium?
Premium adds universal cross-project search, collections, recommendations and Zapier. If your value comes from finding old research, Premium is the tier that delivers it.
Suzy: Is there an API?
Nothing public. Suzy publishes no API documentation and no named connectors beyond Cint. Verify any integration requirement in the sales call before committing.
Aurelius: Is there single sign-on?
Only on Enterprise, along with IP allowlisting, Jira and advanced permissions. Everything below is quoted separately.
Suzy: What changed in April 2026?
Suzy repositioned as an AI Decision Engine with Intelligence and Impact modules, while headcount fell from about 230 to 186. Ask how the roadmap is now split between that and the classic survey and qual products.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aurelius vs Dovetail
- Aurelius vs Attest
- Aurelius vs Condens
- Aurelius vs Marvin
- Aurelius vs Reduct
- Aurelius vs Remesh
- Aurelius vs GWI
- Aurelius vs Terra
- Aurelius vs Benchling
- Aurelius vs Castor EDC
- Aurelius vs Genedata
- Aurelius vs Florence eBinders
- Aurelius vs Form Bio
- Aurelius vs Greenphire
- Aurelius vs Labguru
- Aurelius vs SurveyMonkey
- Aurelius vs Zappi
- Aurelius vs Medidata Rave
- Aurelius vs Contentsquare
- Aurelius vs LabVantage
- Aurelius vs Valispace
- Aurelius vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Aurelius vs Zotero
- Aurelius vs Elicit
- Aurelius vs Mendeley
- Suzy vs Dovetail
- Suzy vs Attest
- Suzy vs Condens
- Suzy vs Marvin
- Suzy vs Reduct
- Suzy vs Remesh
- Suzy vs GWI
- Suzy vs Terra
- Suzy vs Benchling
- Suzy vs Castor EDC
- Suzy vs Genedata
- Suzy vs Florence eBinders
- Suzy vs Form Bio
- Suzy vs Greenphire
- Suzy vs Labguru
- Suzy vs SurveyMonkey
- Suzy vs Zappi
- Suzy vs Medidata Rave
- Suzy vs Contentsquare
- Suzy vs LabVantage
- Suzy vs Valispace
- Suzy vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Suzy vs Zotero
- Suzy vs Elicit
- Suzy vs Mendeley
