Recruiteevs
Workable


Workable: Broader job board reach and sourcing for a similar mid-market buyer, priced per active job in a comparable way

Collaborative applicant tracking priced by active job slots rather than recruiter seats
As of 31 August 2026, Recruitee's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A Dutch ATS that charges for the number of jobs you have open, not the number of people using it, which inverts the usual cost model when many hiring managers are involved. Softwr lists it under Recruitment. Recruitee is made by Recruitee, part of Tellent, available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
Recruitee is an applicant tracking system built in Amsterdam in 2015 around collaborative hiring, where hiring managers and interviewers work inside the system rather than receiving forwarded CVs. It provides a careers site builder, multi-board posting, pipeline automation, evaluation scorecards, scheduling and reporting, with a visual pipeline editor that lets each job carry its own stages. The pricing model is the commercially important detail. Recruitee sells by active job slots with unlimited users, which is the opposite of the per-seat model used by most competitors. For a company with 12 open roles and 60 people involved in interviewing, that is dramatically cheaper and it removes the temptation to keep managers outside the system to save licences. For a company running 80 simultaneous requisitions with three recruiters, the same model is expensive, and the two shapes are not comparable on a headline price at all. Since 2021 Recruitee has been part of Tellent, a group that also sells an HRIS and a performance management product, which means the roadmap is now shaped by suite integration rather than standalone ATS competition. Buyers are European scale-ups and mid-market employers of roughly 50 to 1,000 people. The trade-off is depth: sourcing and recruitment CRM are limited, and US enterprise compliance reporting for equal opportunity obligations is weaker than what a North American buyer expects.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Recruitee.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Workable: Broader job board reach and sourcing for a similar mid-market buyer, priced per active job in a comparable way


Teamtailor: Better employer branding and content tools if candidate attraction is the constraint


Ashby: Stronger analytics and scheduling for a talent team that runs high requisition volume and wants funnel data
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Launch
On request
Scale
On request
Lead
On request
Capabilities
Job slot pricing
Cost scales with concurrent open roles while user access stays unlimited
Visual pipeline editor
Per-job stages, automated actions and disqualification rules built without configuration consultants
Careers site builder
A hosted and customisable careers site with structured job pages
Multi-posting
Publishing to more than a thousand free and paid job boards from one action
Evaluation scorecards
Structured interview feedback tied to stages so managers score against defined criteria
Automated actions
Triggered emails, task assignment and stage movement based on candidate events
Talent pools and nurture
Reusable pools with email campaigns for repeat hiring
Reporting
Funnel, source and time-to-hire dashboards with export
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
By the number of job slots you keep active, with unlimited users. Compare it against per-seat products by modelling your real concurrent requisition count, not headcount.
It is part of Tellent, a European group that also sells an HRIS and a performance management product.
Slots are reusable, so closing a role frees the slot for the next one. The cost only rises when concurrent open roles exceed your plan.
No. It is built for in-house hiring. Agencies need a system with client and placement management such as Bullhorn or JobAdder.
Keep looking
Structured collaborative hiring where every stage is assigned to a named person, now part of Spark Hire
Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies
Background check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately
Job posting and applicant matching platform priced per job slot, quoted individually per employer
AI sourcing and hiring platform priced against the recruiting tool stack it consolidates
Sourcing platform with published tiered pricing and an optional dedicated human sourcer
Technical coding assessment platform priced by annual invite volume, not by seat count alone
Technical hiring platform with a metered attempt allowance and per-attempt overage charges on its entry tier
Job search app aggregating listings, owned by Recruit Holdings, the same parent as Glassdoor
Talent intelligence and sourcing platform built on a large pre-aggregated candidate data set, demo-only pricing
Recruitment platform for staffing agencies and in-house teams, majority owned by the SEEK job board group
Outsourced technical interviewing, engineers conduct your candidate interviews for you
AI notetaking and sourcing agents for recruiters, priced per agent rather than per platform
Structured collaborative hiring where every stage is assigned to a named person, now part of Spark Hire
Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Recruitee, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Recruiting CRM and AI sourcing tool that layers onto an existing ATS or replaces it
Per user per month, by company size and seat typeTalent intelligence and sourcing platform built on a large pre-aggregated candidate data set, demo-only pricing
quoteEmployer review and salary transparency app owned by Recruit Holdings, the same parent as Indeed
Free for job seekers, employers pay for branding and recruiting productsAI sourcing and hiring platform priced against the recruiting tool stack it consolidates
quote, enterprise pricing set against the tool stack replacedTechnical coding assessment platform priced by annual invite volume, not by seat count alone
Per year by candidate invite volume, with platform user limits per tierTechnical hiring platform with a metered attempt allowance and per-attempt overage charges on its entry tier
Per month by tier, with a metered annual candidate attempt allowance and per-attempt overage on StarterSourcing platform with published tiered pricing and an optional dedicated human sourcer
Per user per month, tiered by lead volume and sourcer supportBackground check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately
Per report, plus pass-through court and database fees