OpenMRSvs
REDCap
REDCap: If you need structured clinical research data capture rather than a live medical record
OpenMRS
Open source electronic medical record platform for low-resource settings, with no vendor and paid implementers instead
As of 1 September 2026, OpenMRS is free to use. A medical record system used across sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Latin America, built by a community rather than a company. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. OpenMRS is made by OpenMRS community and OpenMRS Inc., available on Linux, Web, Windows.
Overview
What OpenMRS does
OpenMRS is a free, openly licensed electronic medical record platform designed for resource-constrained health systems. It is a framework more than a finished product: a concept dictionary and data model, a modular architecture, and a modern React front end, from which implementers assemble a system for a particular clinical programme. It has been deployed at national scale for HIV, tuberculosis, maternal health and primary care in dozens of countries, often as the clinical layer beneath DHIS2 reporting, and it supports FHIR for interoperability with laboratory and other systems. Who maintains it, and who you call when it breaks, is what decides adoption. There is no vendor. OpenMRS is stewarded by a community and a supporting organisation, with development contributed by implementing partners, universities and health informatics groups, funded largely through donor programmes. Commercial support exists but not from OpenMRS itself; it comes from implementers such as Mekom Solutions, which offers long-term production service level agreements for OpenMRS, Bahmni and its own Ozone distribution, and from regional partners in the countries where the software runs. A ministry of health procuring OpenMRS is therefore procuring an implementer, and the risk sits in that contract rather than in the licence. Distributions matter too: Bahmni and Ozone bundle OpenMRS with billing, laboratory and inventory components, and choosing a distribution is a bigger commitment than choosing the core. Buyers are ministries of health, hospital networks and NGOs. The trade-off is real ownership: no licence cost, but the cost of the people who keep it running never goes away.
What people use it for
- A ministry of health standardising HIV treatment records across hundreds of facilities where per-patient licensing would be unaffordable
- A hospital network in a country where no commercial vendor supports the local language, clinical forms or reporting requirements
- An NGO running a tuberculosis programme that must report into DHIS2 and needs the clinical record beneath it to be modifiable
- A health system that wants to own its clinical data model outright rather than depend on a vendor to extend it
The honest half
Where it falls short
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about OpenMRS.
- There is no vendor and no support contract from OpenMRS itself, so a procurement that requires a named supplier with a service level must instead contract an implementer, and the quality of that implementer determines the outcome more than the software does
- It is a framework rather than a ready product, so a deployment requires clinical content, form design, concept dictionary work and integration before a single patient is registered, and that work is months of skilled effort
- Funding comes largely from donor programmes, which makes the pace of core development dependent on grant cycles rather than on a commercial roadmap, and priorities can shift when a funder does
- Distribution choice, core OpenMRS against Bahmni against Ozone, locks in a different set of components and a different implementer pool, and migrating between distributions later is close to a fresh implementation
- The people cost never goes away: a national deployment needs permanent internal informatics capacity or a permanent support contract, and organisations that budget only the zero licence fee run out of money at the point the system becomes clinically critical
Cross-shopped
What people choose instead of OpenMRS
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.
- OpenMRSvsAthenahealth
Athenahealth: If you are in a market with commercial vendors, billing requirements and want a supported product rather than a platform
- OpenMRSvsCerner
Cerner: If you need an enterprise hospital record with contracted support and can fund the licensing
Pricing
What OpenMRS costs
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
OpenMRS
Free
- Openly licensed, no licence fee and no seat limits
- Community support through forums and the OpenMRS Talk platform
- No support contract available from OpenMRS itself
- Commercial support and production service levels bought from implementers such as Mekom Solutions
- Hosting, configuration and clinical content are your cost, not the software
Capabilities
Features
Concept dictionary
A structured clinical vocabulary that lets one data model serve very different clinical programmes
Modular architecture
Functionality added as modules rather than by forking the core
Modern front end
React-based user interface built for varied device types and slow connections
FHIR support
Interoperability with laboratory, pharmacy and reporting systems through HL7 FHIR
Offline tolerance
Deployments designed for intermittent connectivity and local server operation
Patient matching and registration
Identity handling suited to settings without national identifiers
Distributions
Bahmni and Ozone package OpenMRS with billing, laboratory and inventory components
Answered, with sources
Questions people ask
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Who supports OpenMRS if it breaks?
Not OpenMRS itself. Support is bought from implementers such as Mekom Solutions, which offers long-term production service level agreements for OpenMRS, Bahmni and Ozone deployments, or from regional partners.
Is it really free?
The software has no licence fee. Hosting, configuration, clinical content, integration and support are the real cost, and they are ongoing.
What is the difference between OpenMRS, Bahmni and Ozone?
OpenMRS is the core platform. Bahmni and Ozone are distributions that package it with billing, laboratory and inventory components. Choosing a distribution constrains your implementer options.
Does it support FHIR?
Yes. FHIR support is the standard route for integrating laboratory, pharmacy and national reporting systems.
Keep looking
Where to go from OpenMRS
- OpenMRS alternativesEvery product people weigh against it
- OpenMRS pricingPlans, floors and what the tiers exclude
- OpenMRS badgesWhich rules it meets, and the figure behind each
- All Healthcare softwareThe full category
- Best Healthcare softwareThe shortlist, and how it was cut
Best Healthcare software for
Compare OpenMRS with
- GNU Health
- DHIS2
- Athenahealth
- Cerner
- Bahmni
- OpenClinica
- Open Dental
- Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging
- Included Health
- Halaxy
- Meru Health
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- PioneerRx
- Rad AI
- Aidoc
- Annalise.ai
- Rx30
Other Healthcare software
Free hospital and health information system from a small NGO, built on the Tryton framework
Open source12 researched notesOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source12 researched notesHealth information technology solutions for healthcare organizations
Pricing on request6 researched notesOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source13 researched notesClinical trial EDC with a genuinely open source community edition alongside a quoted commercial platform
Pricing on request9 researched notesCloud medical image exchange and vendor neutral archive, now part of Intelerad
Pricing on request12 researched notesServer-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
Pricing on request12 researched notesCare navigation and virtual care in one contract for self funded employers and health plans
Pricing on request12 researched notesPractice management for allied health that charges nothing for the software and earns on payments
Free plan12 researched notesTwelve week therapist led mental health programme combining an app, a clinician and HRV biofeedback
Pricing on request12 researched notesEnterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
Pricing on request12 researched notesPharmacy management system built for independent community pharmacies
Pricing on request13 researched notesGenerative reporting and follow-up tracking for radiology, positioned outside the diagnostic device boundary
Pricing on request12 researched notesFDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
Pricing on request11 researched notesMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
Pricing on request12 researched notesLong-established pharmacy management system for independents and small chains
Pricing on request13 researched notes
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for OpenMRS, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
More on OpenMRS
OpenMRS alternatives
What people switch to, and what they give up
OpenMRS pricing
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Compare OpenMRS
Put it head to head with anything we hold
OpenMRS badge
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Best Healthcare software alternatives
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quoteOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence fee
Period and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscription
Period and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscriptionOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence feeMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
quote