Sumacvs
Bloomerang


Bloomerang: Better if you only need fundraising and want published pricing and retention reporting

Modular nonprofit CRM that pairs donor management with client case management
As of 31 August 2026, Sumac's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A Canadian donor database sold as modules, unusual because case management sits beside fundraising in the same record set. Softwr lists it under Nonprofits. Sumac is made by Silent Partner Software, available on Web, Windows.
Overview
Sumac is a nonprofit CRM from Silent Partner Software in Toronto, covering donors, memberships, volunteers, events, grants and pledges. It has been sold since the early 2000s and is bought largely by Canadian and US charities in the twenty to two hundred staff range. The vendor has been consolidating its products under the Societ brand, so buyers will encounter both names during a sales cycle. What separates it from the rest of the donor CRM field is the case management module. Shelters, counselling agencies, food security programmes and legal clinics have to record client interactions, referrals and outcomes, and almost every donor CRM forces them to buy a second system for it. Sumac keeps both in one database, which means a programme director and a fundraiser are querying the same platform. That also raises a governance question the vendor does not answer for you: client case notes and donor records have very different confidentiality rules, and putting them in one system makes permissioning a design decision rather than an afterthought. Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module set and organisation size, which makes comparison against a published per contact product like Keela or Little Green Light awkward, because you cannot price a shortlist without entering a sales conversation. The counterweight is that modular pricing means an organisation that only wants donors and grants is not paying for events and volunteers it will never open.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Sumac.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Bloomerang: Better if you only need fundraising and want published pricing and retention reporting


DonorPerfect: Larger install base, more integrations and a longer track record for pure donor management


CharityEngine: Stronger when high volume direct response and payment processing are the priority
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Sumac
On request
Capabilities
Donor and gift management
Contact records, gift entry, pledges and receipting
Case management module
Client files, case notes, referrals and outcome tracking alongside donor data
Memberships and volunteers
Renewal tracking, volunteer hours and assignment scheduling
Grant management
Application deadlines, reporting requirements and awarded fund tracking
Role based permissions
Separates client confidential records from fundraising staff access
Custom fields and forms
Adds programme specific data capture without vendor development
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
The vendor has been moving its products under the Societ brand, so you may see both names for the same platform during a sales cycle.
Yes, that is its clearest differentiator among donor CRMs. It is a licensed module, not part of the base product.
No. It is quoted by module and organisation size, which makes like for like comparison harder than with published per contact products.
Yes, though the vendor is Canadian and its receipting and support conventions are strongest for Canadian organisations.
Keep looking
Nonprofit CRM with its own in-house payment processing rather than a third-party gateway
The rolled-up parent of EveryAction, Apricot, CyberGrants and Network for Good, sold as three product lines
Nonprofit CRM and fundraising platform with Canadian tax receipting built in
Open source constituent relationship management for nonprofits, with no per contact or per donation fee
A low-cost grant opportunity database sold on annual membership, usually at a heavy standing discount
Configurable grants, research and case management platform for large funders
Fund accounting for nonprofits and churches, with donor management and online giving attached
Offline-first case management and mobile data collection for frontline health and development programmes
Low-cost grant search across federal, state and private funders, with a paid consultant marketplace alongside
Peer to peer and campaign fundraising platform funded by optional donor tips rather than a platform fee
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Sumac, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Offline-first case management and mobile data collection for frontline health and development programmes
Per month by mobile user countThe rolled-up parent of EveryAction, Apricot, CyberGrants and Network for Good, sold as three product lines
quoteGrants management for foundations and corporate givers inside the Blackbaud ecosystem
quoteOpen-source association management system for nonprofits
Open source, with paid hosting availableNonprofit CRM with its own in-house payment processing rather than a third-party gateway
quoteFunder and nonprofit data subscriptions from the organisation formed by Foundation Center and GuideStar
Per user per month by tier