Aplosvs
QuickBooks


QuickBooks: Cheaper and far more widely supported by accountants, if you can live with tracking funds by class

Fund accounting for nonprofits and churches, with donor management and online giving attached
As of 31 August 2026, Aplos's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Accounting software built around fund and restricted gift tracking rather than general bookkeeping, sold with a donor database and giving pages. Softwr lists it under Nonprofits. Aplos is made by Aplos Software, available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
Aplos is a cloud accounting platform for nonprofits and churches, based in Fresno, California. Its core is fund accounting: separate tracking of unrestricted, temporarily restricted and permanently restricted funds, with reporting shaped to the statements a nonprofit board and auditor expect rather than the profit and loss a business needs. Around that it sells donor management, online donation pages, contribution statements and event registration. The distinction that matters is the direction of travel. Most nonprofit systems are donor databases that later added bookkeeping exports, and they treat restricted funds as a tag on a gift. Aplos treats the fund as a dimension of the ledger, so a grant with spending restrictions is enforced in the accounts rather than tracked in a parallel spreadsheet. For an organisation whose auditor keeps raising restricted fund reporting, that is the entire argument, and it is why Aplos wins against a general ledger like QuickBooks plus a donor CRM even though that pairing is cheaper on paper. Aplos acquired the Canadian nonprofit CRM Keela in 2023, which tells you where the product is heading: an accounting spine with a fundraising front end joined to it. A buyer evaluating Aplos and Keela separately should know they are evaluating one company. The trade off is depth on the fundraising side. Aplos donor management is competent record keeping, not the segmentation and automation a serious fundraising programme runs on, so larger development teams keep a dedicated CRM and use Aplos purely for the books.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Aplos.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


QuickBooks: Cheaper and far more widely supported by accountants, if you can live with tracking funds by class


Bloomerang: Better choice when the real problem is donor retention and fundraising rather than the books


Blackbaud Raiser's Edge: Enterprise option when fundraising complexity, not accounting, is the constraint
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Aplos
On request
Capabilities
Fund accounting ledger
Tracks restricted and unrestricted funds as a dimension of the general ledger
Nonprofit financial statements
Statement of financial position and activities in the format boards and auditors expect
Donor management
Contact records, giving history and annual contribution statements
Online giving pages
Hosted donation and recurring gift forms feeding directly into the ledger
Budgeting by fund
Sets and reports budgets per fund or programme rather than only organisation wide
Church tools
Contribution tracking, people management and giving statements for congregations
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Primarily fund accounting. The donor management is included but shallow compared with a dedicated nonprofit CRM.
Aplos acquired Keela in 2023. The two are being integrated, so a buyer comparing them is comparing products from one company.
For a single entity nonprofit, usually yes, and it handles restricted funds far better. For multi entity consolidation, no.
Through a partner integration rather than natively, so payroll is an extra subscription and an extra reconciliation.
Keep looking
Nonprofit CRM with its own in-house payment processing rather than a third-party gateway
Modular nonprofit CRM that pairs donor management with client case management
Affordable donor management for small nonprofits
Open source constituent relationship management for nonprofits, with no per contact or per donation fee
Donation checkout layer that replaces the giving form on an existing nonprofit website
Fundraising software given free to nonprofits, funded by its founders rather than by fees
Mobile bidding and event fundraising for charity auctions and galas
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Aplos, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Offline-first case management and mobile data collection for frontline health and development programmes
Per month by mobile user countThe rolled-up parent of EveryAction, Apricot, CyberGrants and Network for Good, sold as three product lines
quoteGrants management for foundations and corporate givers inside the Blackbaud ecosystem
quoteOpen-source association management system for nonprofits
Open source, with paid hosting availableNonprofit CRM with its own in-house payment processing rather than a third-party gateway
quoteFunder and nonprofit data subscriptions from the organisation formed by Foundation Center and GuideStar
Per user per month by tier