Softwr
Condens logo

Condens

UX research repository for storing, tagging and sharing qualitative study findings

As of 31 August 2026, Condens starts at €15/month. Condens is a bootstrapped, profitable German research repository whose 15 euro solo tier is the cheapest credible way for one researcher to stop losing findings in Google Drive. Softwr lists it under Research. Condens is made by Condens Insights GmbH, available on Web.

Overview

What Condens does

Condens is a repository for qualitative user research. Researchers upload interviews, usability sessions, notes and recordings, get automatic transcription across a wide range of languages, then highlight and tag passages, cluster them into themes and publish insights that link back to the underlying evidence. Anyone reading a finding can click through to the moment in the recording where a participant actually said it, which is the difference between an insight a product manager trusts and one they argue with. What distinguishes it commercially is that it is bootstrapped and profitable with a team of around fifteen people, based in Munich, and it competes against venture-funded repositories with far larger product organisations. That shows up as GDPR posture and European data handling that enterprise procurement in Germany and the Netherlands finds straightforward, and as a tagging interface that researchers consistently pick up faster than the alternatives. It also shows up as a slower pace of new AI feature launches than the funded competition. Buyers are UX research teams and solo researchers, with a customer list weighted towards European enterprises. The trade-off is the pricing cliff: Lite is 15 euros per contributor per month with no viewer seats and a 25-participant limit, and Business is 500 euros a month for five contributors with unlimited viewers. There is nothing in between, so a team growing from two researchers to four faces a thirty-fold increase in bill.

What people use it for

  • A solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month
  • A European enterprise research team that needs GDPR-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement
  • A team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports it
  • A researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one place

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Condens.

  • The gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.
  • Lite includes no viewer seats at all, which defeats the main purpose of a repository: anyone outside the research team who wants to read a finding has to be paid for as a contributor or sent a static export.
  • Cross-project participant profiles are capped at 25 on Lite, so a solo researcher doing longitudinal work with a recurring panel outgrows the entry tier on that limit rather than on seats.
  • As a bootstrapped fifteen-person company it ships AI synthesis, automatic theme extraction and moderated-interview features more slowly than venture-funded rivals, so teams that want the repository to do the analysis rather than organise it will find it behind.
  • It is a repository, not a research platform: recruitment, panel management, unmoderated testing and survey fielding all live elsewhere, so it adds a subscription rather than consolidating one.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Condens

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • Condens logo
    Condens
    vs
    Dovetail logo
    Dovetail

    Dovetail: If you want a larger product organisation shipping AI analysis features faster and can absorb the higher price

  • Condens logo
    Condens
    vs
    Maze logo
    Maze

    Maze: If your need is running unmoderated tests and gathering the data rather than storing and synthesising it

  • Condens logo
    Condens
    vs
    Notion logo
    Notion

    Notion: If your research volume is low enough that a well-structured wiki genuinely covers it

Pricing

What Condens costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Lite

€15 /mo

  • 1 contributor included, additional contributors 15 euros each
  • No viewer seats
  • Unlimited projects, transcription hours and storage
  • 25 cross-project participant profiles
  • 1 folder
  • 165 euros a year on annual billing

Business

€500 /mo

  • 5 contributors included, additional contributors 85 euros each
  • Unlimited viewers
  • Unlimited participant profiles and folders
  • Advanced sharing and permissions
  • 6,000 euros a year on annual billing

Enterprise

On request

  • Minimum 5 contributors
  • Custom contributor rates
  • Unlimited viewers
  • Security review, SSO and procurement support

Capabilities

Features

  • Automatic transcription

    Transcribes uploaded sessions across a wide set of languages with speaker separation

  • Highlight and tag

    Marks passages in transcripts and video and applies a shared tag taxonomy

  • Theme clustering

    Groups tagged evidence into affinity clusters for synthesis

  • Insight pages

    Publishes findings that link directly back to source clips

  • Participant profiles

    Tracks participants across studies, capped at 25 on the entry plan

  • Search across studies

    Finds evidence by tag, participant attribute or transcript text across the whole repository

  • Viewer seats

    Gives stakeholders read access without a contributor licence on the Business tier

  • Video clip reels

    Assembles supporting clips into a shareable highlight sequence

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Is there a free plan?

No, only a 15-day trial on any tier with no card required.

Can stakeholders read findings without a licence?

Only on Business and above, where viewer seats are unlimited. Lite has none.

Is transcription metered?

No. Transcription hours, storage and project count are unlimited on every plan; participant profiles and folders are what the tiers restrict.

Where is data hosted?

Condens is a German company with an explicitly GDPR-oriented setup, which is a common reason European enterprises shortlist it.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from Condens

Best Research software for

Compare Condens with

Other Research software

  • AI-powered customer intelligence and research repository.

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • UX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later

    From $49/mo13 researched notes
  • Qualitative research repository with AI notetaking, and an MCP server you can query from Claude

    Free plan13 researched notes
  • Edit video by editing its transcript, built for researchers rather than video editors

    From $12/mo12 researched notes
  • Easy-to-use, collaborative qualitative analysis software

    Pricing on request11 researched notes
  • Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Regulated cloud platform for genomic and multiomic data, with GxP and FedRAMP coverage

    Pricing on request10 researched notes
  • Electronic data capture for regulated clinical trials, sold only through a sales process

    Pricing on request9 researched notes
  • Reference management essentials

    From $4.15/mo12 researched notes
  • Live AI-moderated conversations with hundreds of participants at once, analysed in real time

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • No-code lab operating system combining LIMS, ELN and inventory for biotech teams

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Enterprise consumer insights on an owned US panel, resold elsewhere through Cint

    Pricing on request14 researched notes
  • Requirements and systems engineering for hardware teams, with published per-seat pricing

    From $999/yr12 researched notes
  • Symbolic and numeric computation environment built on the Wolfram Language and a curated knowledge base

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Automated consumer insights platform for testing advertising, product concepts and brand health

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Collect, organize, annotate, cite and share your research

    Free, then $20/yr9 researched notes
  • The AI research assistant

    Free, then $49/mo9 researched notes
  • The free all-in-one reference manager

    Free, then $4.99/mo10 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Condens, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on Condens

Best Research software alternatives

Science-aware laboratory platform combining LIMS, ELN and scientific data management

quote

R&D cloud for biotechnology research and molecular biology

Free for academics, quoted for organisations

UX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later

Flat monthly fee, unlimited users

Cheminformatics toolkits and structure handling, now a Certara subsidiary

quote

Laboratory information management from Abbott for regulated and public health labs

quote

Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors

quote

Enterprise LIMS with integrated ELN and biobanking capability

quote

Enterprise laboratory information management system for regulated labs

quote

Compare Condens with alternatives